Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: copyright act 1957 chapter 14 · Page 1 of about 346 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 2011

The Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of IndiA. Vs. Uni ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-07-2011

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2(ff), 13, 33(3), 34(3), 34, 78, 2(dd), 1 (2), 35 - Chapter 14 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 14, 19(1)(g), 12 ;

of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ striking down Sections 2(ff), 13, 33(3), 34(3) of the Copyright Act, 1957 as these provisions are perceived by the Petitioners as being violative of Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the … the Copyright Act empowers the Central Government to make Rules for carrying out the purposes of the statute. Chapter V of the Copyright Rules, 1958 framed pursuant thereto, concerns the registration and functioning of Copyright and Performing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2005

Eurokids International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. India Book Distributors Egmont Bo ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-05-2005

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 51, 54, 61 and 61(1)

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR198

created in favour of plaintiffs.9. In support of his submissions Mr. Saraf invites my attention to definitions in Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for the sake of brevity) and more particularly term 'Exclusive Licence' (Section … sections 14, 18 and 19 as well as Section 51 of the Act. He also takes me through Chapter-XII and more particularly Section 54. Mr. Saraf also relies upon a Division Bench decision reported in : AIR1985Delhi29

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2008

Espn Star Sports Vs. Global Broadcast News Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-26-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 18, 19, 30, 37, 37(3), 39, 39A, 51, 52, 52B, 53, 55, 58, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 64, 65 and 66; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 9; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : LC2008(3)257; 2008(38)PTC477(Del)

learned Single Judge had dismissed the entire suit of the appellant/plaintiff for non-compliance of Section 61 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). 2. After the arguments were heard in this appeal, both the parties … relief. 7. The learned Single Judge in his judgment dated 18th February, 2008 held as follows:40. No doubt, Chapter VIII deals with a species of rights known as broadcast reproduction rights. The content and extent of that … in 1994. Recognizing the need to protect the rights in broadcasts, Article 14(3) was incorporated into the TRIPS Agreement. It reads as under: Article Protection

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 31 2016

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. and Another Vs. Entertainment ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-2016

Subject : Arbitration

of copyright could not be referred to arbitration and the exclusive remedy for such infringement is available in Chapter XII of the Copyright Act, 1957. He submits that Chapter XII of the Copyright Act, 1957 specifically prescribed … India from time to time. The original respondent is a Copyright Society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and is a non-profit making body established on 23rd August 1969 to monitor, protect and enforce the rights, … paid by the claimant to the original respondent under the license agreement. 14. M/s.Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd. had filed a Suit before the Calcutta High

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2008

Phonographic Performance Ltd. Vs. Hotel Gold Regency and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 30, 33, 33(1), 33(3), 34, 34(1), 34(3), 35, 35(2), 51, 53A, 54, 55, 61, 61(1) and 62; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 188; Companies Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR2009Delhi11; 151(2008)DLT210; LC2008(2)451; 2008(37)PTC587(Del)

power to adopt any legal process to recover the same. In this context it was also submitted that chapter VII of the Copyright Act, 1957 not only authorises the doing of business by a copyright society of … the maintainability of the suit:1. Whether, in view of the provisions of sections 33 and 34 of the Copyright Act, 1957, a suit for infringement of copyright would be maintainable at the instance of a registered copyright society in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2002

Eastern Book Company and ors. Vs. D.B. Modak and ors. and Mr. NavIn J. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-27-2002

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act - Sections 2, 13, 14, 16, 17, 51, 52, 52(1) and 52(4); Evidence Act - Sections 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT205

the aforesaid judgments clearly show that a matter in public domain cannot be a private property. Under the Copyright Act, 1957 except under the provisions of the Act, there cannot be copyright under the common law. Under Section 16 … on earlier occasions;28. Section 16 specifies that no copyright can be claimed except as provided in the Act. Chapter 10 provides for registration of the copyright but it is well settled that copyright need not be registered.Chapter … judgments which is within the public domain and is covered by Section 14 of the Copyright Act, but in relation to the other matters as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1992

Brooke Bond India Limited Vs. Balaji Tea (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-25-1992

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : (1993)2MLJ132

such infringement is made in the plaint. Hence, the suit is one falling under Chapter XII of the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 62(1) of the Act provides that every suit arising under the said Chapter in respect of the … passing off its goods as that of the plaintiff/appellant using the impugned label; and its application under Clause 14 of the Letters Patent for leave to combine the causes of action for infringement of trade mark and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2026

Star India Private Limited vs Kannada Film Producers Association

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-20-2026

and 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957 which reads as under:-“ 54. Definition.- For the purposes of this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, the expression “owner of copyright” shall include-(a) an exclusive licensee;(b) in the case … the suit which was not maintainable in view of Sections 54 and 55 r/w Section 61(1) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short ‘the said Act of 1957’) and the plaint was liable to be rejected. It was contended … ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE - 14 - APPLICATIONS FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 OF CPC FOR REJECTION

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2026

Terix Computer Service India Pvt Ltd vs M/S Tpm Guru Private Ltd & ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-28-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

(1990) SCC Online Del 269, wherein the Delhi High Court observed as under: “If reference is made to Chapter XII of the Copyright Act, 1957 relating to civil remedies in case of infringement of copyright, every suit … the Defendants after cessation of all alleged contractual relationships. The Suit is founded on statutory rights under the Copyright Act, 1957 (“Copyright Act”) and not on any contractual covenant. 13.3. Section 8 of the Act mandates reference to arbitration … and exploit the proprietary software systems namely ‘Ticketmaster’, ‘Apollo’, ‘Parser’ under Sections 14 and 55 of the Copyright Act to the exclusion of others. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2023

Sri. Jairam Ramesh Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-28-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

COMPLAINT DATED0407.2022 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION34 120B, 403, 465 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE1860 SECTION63OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957 AND SECTION66OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, REGISTERED BY THE R1 3 YASHWANTHAPURA POLICE STATION, PENDING ON THE FILE … against the petitioners, on 04-11-2022. The allegation in the complaint is that popular songs from the film KGF Chapter-2 were played in the backdrop of the Yatra by violating the copyright, as it was without any agreement/permission … handling pages have been created: i. https:// twitter.com INCIndia: ii. https:// www.youtube.com/c/BharatJodoYatra 14 featured: iii. https://www.instagram.com/bharatjodo;/ iv. https://t.me/bharatjodovatra; v. https://www.facebook.com/Bharajodo/, and so on. Under the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial