Advanced Search Results
The Secretary of State for India Vs. Bhaskar Krishnaji Samant
Mumbai
Apr-07-1925
Civil
AIR1925Bom485; (1925)27BOMLR973
in case of a breach of the conditions thereof may, notwithstanding anything in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, be recovered from him in case of such breach as if it were an arrear of land-revenue.16. It … Rules framed by Bombay Government-Intra vires-prohibition to tenderer from withdrawing a tender once made-Indian Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 5 and 25.;The rule framed by the Government of Bombay, under Section 75 (d) of the Indian Forest
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala and ors. Vs. United Shippers and Dredgers Ltd.
Kerala
Jul-15-1982
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 74
AIR1982Ker281
the breach of the contract, claim for compensation will lie in the light of Section 74 of the Contract Act, 1872 (for short the 'Act'). 5. The main part of Section 74 of the Act reads thus : '74. … 6. It is necessary to understand the scheme of Chapter VI of the Act which consists of three sections, viz., Sections 73, 74 and 75. The main part of Section 73 reads thus : '73. Compensation for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.K. Sundaram Vs. the Cooperative Sugars Ltd.
Chennai
Mar-11-1987
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 74; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1904 - Sections 9 and 34
AIR1988Mad167
Act, 1961.5. Before considering the questions raised we will do well by examining the relevant provisions of the Contract Act, 1872, relating to the award of compensation for breach of contract. Sec. 74 of the Contract Act reads as … to costs.10. Order accordingly. Contract - compensation for loss - Section 74 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Sections 9 and 34 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - compensation in breach of contract - party claiming
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Excel Cardamom Company Vs. the Spices Trading Corporation Ltd. and anr ...
Delhi
Jul-18-2007
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 74
IV(2007)BC419; 2007BusLR131(Del); 2007(97)DRJ257; (2008)149PLR44
is stated to be not one which could be reasonable within the provisions of Section 74 of the Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Contract Act') It has also been pointed out that part of the goods … not justified. The compensation is stated to be not one which could be reasonable within the provisions of Section 74 of the Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Contract Act') It has also been pointed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.P. Financial Corporation Vs. Parveen Kumar and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
May-07-1993
CommercialBanking
State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Section 29; ;Constitution of India - Article 14; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 74
AIR1994HP120
this way is entitled to charge compound interest. It is true that Explanation to Section 74 of the Contract Act, 1872, entitles the creditor to enter into a stipulation for the increased interest from the date of default, it … conditions of the hypothecated deed and other documents referred to above, resulted into the issuance of notice under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (hereinafter shortly called the Act), asking defendant No. 1 to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Travencore Rubber and Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. C.i.T., Trivandrum
Supreme Court of India
Mar-14-2000
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 51, 256(1) and 263; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 74
AIR2000SC1980; (2000)160CTR(SC)1; [2000]243ITR158(SC); JT2000(3)SC458; 2000(2)SCALE409; (2000)3SCC715; [2000]2SCR290; [2000]109TAXMAN250(SC)
clause has been construed as providing for compensation for breach of contract under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. (See Maula Bux v. Union of India : [1970]1SCR928 and Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills v. Tata Air Craft … assessee in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Direct Taxation - capital gains - Sections 51, 256 (1) and 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Section 74 of Indian Contract Act, 1872
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPasalapudi Brahmayya and anr. Vs. Teegala Gangaraju
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-13-1962
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 74
AIR1963AP310
shall bear their own costs here and in the lower Cour Contract - damage - Section 74 of Contract Act, 1872 - suit for recovery of damage for breach of contract - even though sum to be paid for … of this Court by Narasimham, J., as it raises an important question as to the true interpretation of Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act and accordingly it has now come before us for decision.2. The petitioners
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi Development Authority Vs. Polo Singh and Co.
Delhi
Nov-22-2002
ContractArbitration
Arbitration Act - Sections 14, 17, 29, 30 and 33; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 74
2003(1)ARBLR270(Delhi); 101(2002)DLT401; 2003(66)DRJ132
was a claim of remote nature, which was not permissible under Section 73 & 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. It was contended that after undertaking the construction work respondent/claimant would not have necessarily earned profits. The learned … arbitrator alleged--Award of damages for loss of profit with interest @10% rightly made rule of the court--Objection unsustainable--Contract Act, 1872, Sections 73 & 74.; While allowing claim No. 1 and disallowing counter-claims of appellant on three counts, the arbitrator
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChairman, Board of Trustees, c.p.t. Vs. M/S Arebee Star Maritime agen. ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-05-2020
Education
reading of the provisions of the MPT Act, and on a reading of section 158 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the bailor must repay to the bailee “necessary expenses” incurred by it for the purposes of the bailment. … held liable, to what extent he is liable and whether it absolves the respondent from acting promptly under Sections 61 or 62 of the Act?.6. Since this reference had not yet been answered by the larger Bench
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiva Jute Baling Limited Vs. Hindley and Company Limited
Supreme Court of India
Aug-21-1959
ContractArbitration
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 74; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 33 and 35; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 - Sections 7
AIR1959SC1357; [1960]1SCR569
arbitrators had purported to award such damages as could not be done under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Both these contentions were negatived by the learned Single Judge and he ordered the award to be filed … 7 of the Protocol Act in the light of Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act and their bearing on the damages awarded … In the special leave petition also the appellant raised the same to points, namely, (i) the construction of Sections 33 and 35 of the Arbitration Act and the application of these provisions to the facts of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »