Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 66 · Page 1 of about 991 results (0.072 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 10 2002

Thyssen Stahlunion Gmbh Vs. the Steel Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-10-2002

Subject : Contract

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 30; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73

Reported in : 2002IIAD(Delhi)149; AIR2002Delhi255; 2002(1)ARBLR610(Delhi); 96(2002)DLT515

the issue of damages. The Arbitrator has adopted the principle by referring to Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which is as follows:- '73. When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach … in 1923 in Champsey Bhara and Co. v. Jivraj Balloo Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd. AIR 1923 PC 66 took a view which holds the field till date that the award will stand unless on the face

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2016

Bharat Hari Singhania and Others Vs. Sushila Singhania and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-06-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court, Bombay. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Order 21, Rule 1 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Contract Act, 1872 Section 52 Vacant possession Execution of award Applicant sought to execute Arbitrator award, wherein Applicant Group receive vacant and … can be commenced against some debtors only and in part. In Sardar Madhavrao vs. Narayan Damodar (AIR 1960 66), the court held that the decree holder can execute for his share only, else, he would be obligated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2018

Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited vs.malvinder Mohan Singh and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

pleaded that elements of active concealment are not made out in terms of section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as The Contract Act). Further, the respondent has suffered no loss direct or indirect as … the plaintiff and the remedy of the plaintiff is to rescind the contract of employment in accordance with Section 66 of the Contract Act or to insist that the contract be performed and that the plaintiff be put

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 25 2026

M/S St. Thomas School vs M/S Megalogix

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-25-2026

Subject : Arbitration

statutes, rules, notification, etc. since long, and is also a part of common law. Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 uses the expression by stating that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, inter alia,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1995

Mrs. Aliakutty Paul Vs. the State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-22-1995

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Kerala Forest Act, 1962 - Sections 22 and 66; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 299; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1995Ker291

it is dismissed with costs. Advocate's fee fixed at Rs. 1500/-. Contract - execution - Section 62 of Contract Act, 1872, Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Sections 22 and 66 of Kerala Forest Act, 1962, Articles 226

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1962

Official Receiver, Jhansi Vs. Jugal Kishore Lachhi Ram Jaina, Hyderaba ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-20-1962

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 19, 66 and 229; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 30 and 30(2); Trusts Act - Sections 86; Provincial Insolvency Act - Sections 28 and 28(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1963All459

41. The appeal is hereby dismissed with costs. (i) Contract - fraud - Sections 19 and 66 of Contract Act, 1872, Section 30 of Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Section 86 of Trust Act and Section 28(2) of Provincial Insolvency

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1954

P. Krishna Bhatta and ors. Vs. Mundila Ganapathi Bhatta (Died) and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-15-1954

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 66; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182

Reported in : AIR1955Mad648

Court. Civil - benami transaction - Section 66 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872 - benami transaction not intended to be operative - when transaction once made out to be benami then

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1963

M. Mohammed Sherif and Vs. Official Liquidator, the Seetharam Spinning ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-14-1963

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 23, 25 and 30(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 528 and 529; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 63, 66 and 94

Reported in : AIR1964Ker135

(2) of Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Sections 528 and 529 of Companies Act, 1956, Section 73 of Contract Act, 1872 and Sections 63, 66 and 94 of Trusts Act, 1882 - respondent-mills went into liquidation - claim preferred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1957

M. Ramiah Pillai Vs. P.A. Sankaranarayana Iyer and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-11-1957

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 54 and 66; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1958Ker246

- time limit - Articles 54 and 66 of Schedule to Limitation Act, 1908 and Section 2 of Contract Act, 1872 - suit filed for recovery of money - suit contended as time barred by defendant - signed acknowledgment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2004

Shri S.K. Khosla Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-26-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1971 - Regulations 19(1), 32A, 52, 59, 60 and 66; Food Corporation of India Act, 1964; Termination of Employment for Act; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Service, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1979 - Rules 9, 9(1), 36, 37 and 38; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 110(2004)DLT239; 2004(73)DRJ425; (2004)IILLJ515Del

Appeal Rule 1979'' of the Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited is void under S. 23 of the Contract Act, 1872, as being opposed to public policy and is also ultra virus Art. 14 of the Constitution to the … in view of the decision of the Supreme Court, the impugned Regulation 19(1) is void in terms of Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 as being opposed to public policy and is ultra virus Article 14 … for imposing minor penalties. Special procedure is prescribed in certain cases. Regulation 66 provides for suspension Thus, the provision is not only arbitrary, but is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial