Advanced Search Results
S.A. Zahir Hussain and Another Vs. T. Somasundaram
Chennai
Dec-02-2016
Education
petition if any is closed. Civil Procedure Code- Section 100 - Transfer of Property Act Section 53(A) Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 2(b),(e),(h) Specific Relief Act Section 5, Section 6, Section 22 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Order 39 Rule … the document under Ex.B1 during the pendency of the suit. Therefore, he is bound by the provisions of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. As he had purchased the property with full knowledge of pendency of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioners for the Port of Calcutta Vs. General Trading Corporation ...
Kolkata
Sep-19-1963
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 74E and 80; ;Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Section 142; ;Limitation Act - Section 15(2); ;Sale of Goods Act - Section 23; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 103 and 178; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 137; ;Bills of Lading Act, 1856; ;English Bills of Lading Act, 1855
AIR1964Cal290,68CWN410
toe receipt was an instrument of title to goods within the meaning of Section 103 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The appellants in that case were a firm of commission agents who had been instructed by one Chhaganlal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Salam S/O Sheikh Rahim (Died) Through Lrs. Salma Begum W/O Abdul ...
Mumbai
Nov-18-2005
ContractProperty
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act
2006(2)ALLMR549; 2006(3)BomCR700; 2006(2)MhLj277
defendant No. 1 with the plaintiff is void in view of Sections 10 and 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short, the Contract Act). He contended that defendant No. 3 is a bona fide purchaser of the … 2 on 29-4-1982 and they are bona fide purchaser for value without notice, and therefore, the provisions of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 would not be attracted.(C) The learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited vs.malvinder Mohan Singh and Ors
Delhi
Jan-31-2018
Land Acquisition
pleaded that elements of active concealment are not made out in terms of section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as The Contract Act). Further, the respondent has suffered no loss direct or indirect as … in which he would have been, if the representation made had been true." OMP (EFA) (COMM) 6/2016 Page 52 of 115 xxx"23. The field of pre-contract misrepresentation having been covered by Section 19 of the Contract Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJakson Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Delhi
Sep-12-2003
Property
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 38; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 51 and 52; Delhi Development Authority (Disposal of Developed Nazul Land) Rules, 1981; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 54
2003VIIIAD(Delhi)461; 2004(1)CTLJ185(Del); 107(2003)DLT272
. 24. In this behalf, learned counsel has referred to the provisions of Section 51 of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 ( hereinafter to be referred to as, `the said Act' ), which is as under :-' 51. Promisor … that the order for performance of a contract where reciprocal promises have been provided for is contained in Section 52 of the said Act, which is reads thus :-' 52. Order of performance of reciprocal promises. - Where
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.A. Radha and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-29-2000
ContractLimitation
Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 - Sections 52-A; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 18; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 25(3) and 59; Constitution of India - Articles 62, 137 and 226; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19
2000(2)ALD560; 2000(2)ALT484
18-10-1988 constitutes an agreement in terms of Section 25(3) of the Contract Act.13. Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short 'the Contract Act') is in the following terms:'Section 25. Agreement without consideration void, unless it is … The petitioners, partners of the erstwhile M/s. Vikram Industries, Kakinada, in these proceedings sought a declaration that Section 52-A of A.P. Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 (for short 'the Act') is unconstitutional and that the action of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVilla Moda General Trading Co. W.L.L. and anr. Vs. Chordia Fashions Pv ...
Mumbai
Feb-01-2005
Commercial
Companies Act, 1956; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 51 and 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
2005(3)BomCR41
were to be performed, the rights would be governed by section 51 and section 52 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short 'the Contract Act') which read as follows:- 51. Promisor not bound to perform, Promisor not bound
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Official Assignee of Madras Vs. the Mercantile Bank of India Ltd.
Mumbai
Oct-15-1934
Contract
(1935)37BOMLR130
the documents. The solution of the question depends on the true effect of Section 178 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as then in force; that section which has since been repealed by the Indian Contract (Amendment) Act, 1930, … of the case the consignments of nuts in question constitute property divisible among the creditors in virtue of Section 52 (2) (c), of the Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909, which corresponds with the similar clause in the English Bankruptcy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendrakumar Chandulal Vs. Central Bank of India
Gujarat
Mar-30-1983
Contract
(1984)1GLR237
the bill of lading from liability for the negligence of its servants notwithstanding Section 151 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This is also a Division Bench judgment wherein on the point under consideration, it has been observed as … laid down in Section 151. This Court in Bombay Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. v. Vasudev Babunv (1927) ILR 52 Bom 37 following the case of Sheik Mohamad Ravuther v. The British India Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. (1908)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPushpa Rani Jaggi and ors. Vs. Dwarka Dass (Deceased) Through Lrs.
Delhi
Jan-04-2007
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1), 11, 14(1) and 39; Delhi Shops and Establishment Act; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 3; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 14 and 29; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Shops and Establishment Act
136(2007)DLT346
Development Act, 1957 then the agreement being against the statute is void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. In Dr. K. Madan v. Smt. Krishnawati and Anr. : AIR1997SC579 , while discussing the scope and ambit … Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1976 (18 of 1976);(B) any person to whom a license, as defined by Section 52 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 (5 of 1882), has been granted..Explanation II.- If the person, who acquires,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »