Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 49 · Page 1 of about 1,483 results (0.113 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 24 1967

Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Central Zonal Offi ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-24-1967

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 49(2); Staff Regulations - Regulation 39; Indian Contract Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR1968All270; (1969)IILLJ607All

a person has no common law right to appoint a counsel as his agent. 8. Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 in person who is sui juris has a right to appoint an agent for any purpose whatsoever, but … to produce documents or even to compel the parties before him to do so. Under Clause (b) of Section 49 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956. the Corporation has been authorised to make regulations to provide for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 2007

Toepfer International Asia Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Priyanka Overseas Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-15-2007

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 44, 48, 48(1), 48(2) and 49; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 39 and 63; Arbitration Rules

Reported in : 2007(4)ARBLR499(Delhi)

18.03.200421. Learned Counsel for the decree holder did seek to contend that as per the provisions of Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred as the Contract Act), it was open to the judgment debtor to have either changed the … on the application of the party claiming enforcement of the Award, order the other party to give suitable security.Section 49: Enforcement of foreign Awards. Where the Court is satisfied that the foreign Award is enforceable under this Chapter,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2008

Radhabai Vs. Arunagiri,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-2008

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Union Territories Act - Sections 55; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3, 54 and 105; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91, 92, 101 to 104, 111 and 114; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 11, 16, 17 to 19, 23 and 70; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 31; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3 and 27; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 331; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 49; Revenue Recovery Act; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 30(2), 51, 55 and 61; Notaries Act, 1952; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Muhammadan Law

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ880

also relied on the decision AIR 1993 SC 956 (Mst. Sethani v. Bhana) wherein it is observed as follows:Contract Act (1872), Section 23 - Undue influence - Onus to prove - Sale deed by tribal woman, who was old, illiterate … (Smt. Dularia Devi v. Janardan Singh and Ors.) wherein it is held thus:U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (1953), Section 49 - Bar to Civil suit - Suit to set aside sale deed - Executant illiterate woman - Thumb

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 28 1979

Fatima Fauzia and anr. Vs. Syed Ui-mulk and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-1979

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 15, 46, 47, 48 and 49; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22)

Reported in : AIR1979AP229

breach of trust - Sections 15, 46, 47, 48 and 49 of Trusts Act, 1882, Section 2 of Contract Act, 1872 and Section 3 (22) of General Clauses Act, 1897 - jewellery of 'Nizam' given in trust created in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1967

H.S. Shobasingh and Sons Vs. Saurashtra Iron Foundary and Steel Works ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-14-1967

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1968Guj276; (1968)9GLR932; MANU/GJ/0060/1968

and it is dismissed with costs. Rule discharged.(7) Revision dismissed. Contract - jurisdiction - Section 49 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Section 20 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - opponent firm at Bhavanagar placed order for iron

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1942

Jivatlal Purtapshi Vs. Lalbhai Fulchand Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-1942

Subject : ContractCivil

Reported in : AIR1942Bom251; (1942)44BOMLR495

us, though it is of interest in one respect, because the effect of Section 49 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, was discussed in relation to the common law rule that a debtor must seek out his creditor anywhere

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 1986

Damordardass Agarwal and ors. Vs. R. Badrilal and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-08-1986

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 170, 171 and 217; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 49(1)

Reported in : AIR1987AP254

- Order 3 Rule 4 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sections 170, 171 and 217 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Sections 49 (1) of Advocates Act, 1961 - enquiry under Order 3 Rule 4 is summary nature … to mean : 'an advocate, vakil or attorney of any High Court, a pleader, mukhtar or revenue agent'. Section 4 of the Act recognises the right of the legal practitioners to practise law in the High Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1998

Punjab Breweries Limited Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-18-1998

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : (1998)120PLR423

implied contract for the sale of bottles has no substance. Further, according to section 148 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 bailment is delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they … the bottles. He relied on Oswal Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. v. State of Punjab [1996] 103 STC 491 (P&H) State of Rajasthan v. Jaipur Udyog Limited : AIR1973SC843a Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat v. Chandravilas Hotel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2011

Jitendra S/O Manindranath Bose Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-11-2011

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Section 49, 11, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 139 and 149; Contract Act, 1872 - Section 56(1)(2), 65

contract. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted by relying on the provisions of Section 56 of the Contract Act, 1872 that the contract to deal with liquor became impossible in view of the prohibitory order of the High … that the petitioner cannot be asked to pay the license fee for that period. The Court observed that Section 49 of The Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 did not empower the authorities to demand license fee for the period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 1963

Maria Munnisa Begum Vs. Noore Mohammad Saheb

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-28-1963

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 49; Muhammadan Law

Reported in : AIR1965AP231

Appeals allowed. Family - jurisdiction - Section 20 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 49 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Muhammadan Law - talaq between parties - parties last resided in Pondicherry - whether Pondicherry Court empowered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial