Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 48 · Page 1 of about 1,314 results (0.062 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 11 1996

Mohar Singh Vs. Deen Dayal Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-1996

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)704; 65(1997)DLT1; 2003(39)DRJ760

the of Section '14, he shall be punishable with fine which may extend to one thousands rupees. xxxxxxxxxxxxx Contract Act, 1872 23. What consideration and objects are lawful, and what not The consideration or object of an agreement is … owner of the premises was one Smt.Patashi Bai from whom late Prabhu Dayal was holding shops No.457,458 and 481 as a tenant @ Rs.l37.00 p.m. as rent. Shops No.457 and 458 are located in Khari Baoli; Shop

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2000

Commissioner of Gift-tax Vs. Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust Overruled

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-24-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gift-tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 16(1), 26(1), 45 and 48; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 45 and 48

Reported in : [2001]248ITR275(Ker)

the Act and, therefore, it must carry the meaning assigned to it in Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. . , The above provision is no doubt subject to such qualifications or limitations as contained in the … his personal asset to the firm as his contribution to its capital cannot fall within the terms of Section 48. And as that provision is fundamental to the computation machinery incorporated in the scheme relating to the determination

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1988

Oswal Spinning and Weaving Mills Vs. Collector of Customs and Calcutta

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-15-1988

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1989)(21)LC125Tri(Delhi)

of Port Trust Authority is that of a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, omitting the words "in the absence of any special contract" in Section 152 of that Act, But in … of the same, the proper officer may make an order permitting clearance of the goods for home consumption. Section 48 lays down the procedure in case of goods not cleared, warehoused or transhipped within 45 days after unloading.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 18 2014

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Bhupen Champaklal Dalal and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-18-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

contract had been entered into and acts done by him as the principal in person under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The legal effect of the acts of his business as the broker of the 5th to the 17th … off criminal responsibility by executing a document in favour of a stooge. 48. Despite the admission of the execution of the power of attorney it … Nos.5, 10 or 14. 3. The prosecution has charged each of the accused with having committed offences under Sections 120B, 409, 411, 420, 463, 465, 467 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. There are separate charges

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1979

Fatima Fauzia and anr. Vs. Syed Ui-mulk and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-1979

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 15, 46, 47, 48 and 49; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22)

Reported in : AIR1979AP229

breach of trust - Sections 15, 46, 47, 48 and 49 of Trusts Act, 1882, Section 2 of Contract Act, 1872 and Section 3 (22) of General Clauses Act, 1897 - jewellery of 'Nizam' given in trust created in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1983

Mahendrakumar Chandulal Vs. Central Bank of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-30-1983

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1984)1GLR237

the bill of lading from liability for the negligence of its servants notwithstanding Section 151 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This is also a Division Bench judgment wherein on the point under consideration, it has been observed as … The next case referred to in this connection is that of The Official Assignee, Bombay v. Madholal Sindhu 48 BLR 828. The dispute in this case centred round 26,000 shares on the security of which loan was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2006

Panchanan Dhara and ors. Vs. Monmatha Nath Maity (Dead) Thr. L.Rs. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-12-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 46 and 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100(4); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 54; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 29, 31 and 63

Reported in : AIR2006SC2281; 2006(4)ALD18(SC); [2006]131CompCas577(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ403(SC); [2007(1)JCR226(SC)]; 2006(5)MhLj209; (2006)3MLJ81(SC); 2006MPLJ468(SC); 2006(6)SCALE34; (2006)5SCC340

time for performance being extended, even though originally the agreement had a fixed date. Section 63 of the Contract Act, 1872 provides that every promise may extend time for the performance of the contract. Such an agreement to extend … ext. - 3 there was not necessity of giving any special authorization either Under Section 46 or Under Section 48 of the Companies Act for entering into or for execution of the contract. It is true that at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1986

Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited and anr. Vs. Brojo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-06-1986

Subject : Service

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19(1), 23, 32, 36, 37, 38, 38(1), 39, 40, 41, 42, 47, 51, 51-A, 53(1), 68, 73, 131, 141, 152, 154, 154(1), 162, 226, 298, 308, 311, 311(2), 366, 367(1), 370 and 372; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16(1), 16(2), 19, 19-A, 23 and 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 19\7; Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. (Service, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 - Rules 9 and 11; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1908 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1986SC1571; (1986)3CompLJ1(SC); 1986LabIC1312; (1986)IILLJ171SC; 1986(1)SCALE799; (1986)3SCC156; [1986]2SCR278; 1986(2)SLJ320(SC); [1986] 2 SCR 178; AIR 1986 SC 157; MANU/SC/0439/1986

2) Whether an unconscionable term in a contract of employment is void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as being opposed to public policy and, when such a term is contained in a contract of employment … of Article 370 of the Constitution read with the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954 (CO. 48), set up a Constituent Assembly for the internal Constitution of the State and it had framed the Constitution

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2002

Maharao Brijraj Singh and anr. Vs. Saraswati Devi Sharma

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-05-2002

Subject : CivilContract

Reported in : 2003(3)WLN16

otherwise also, as it was against public policy, being violative of provisions contained in Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872, and such an exemption could have been withdrawn under Section 20(2) of the ULCAR Act which provides as … Ladpura District Kota renowned as Ummaid Vilas Enclave, bearing Khasra Nos. 433, 434, 436 to 439, 440 to 489, 491, 492/684 and 546/691. In the plaint, it was admitted case that the suit land stood acquired by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 2011

Leela Hotels Ltd. Vs. Housing and Urban Dev.Corp.Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-15-2011

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34; Contract Act. - Sections59, 60; Indian Contract Act, 1872.

Reported in : AIR2012SC903; 2012(1)AWC(Supp)39SC; (2012)1MLJ641(SC); 2011(12)SCALE573; (2012)1SCC302

& Ors. [(1999) 3 SCC 80], wherein, this Court had held that Sections 59 and 60 of the Contract Act, 1872, would only be applicable at the pre-decretal stage and not thereafter and that post-decretal payments would have to … initially by Leela Hotels to HUDCO till the date of the Award.5. The Appellant filed its objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter referred to as the "1996 Act", before the High

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial