Advanced Search Results
Wipro Limited Vs. Beckman Coulter International S.A.
Delhi
Jul-11-2006
Arbitration
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27 and 28; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 41 and 42
2006(3)ARBLR118(Delhi); 2006(2)CTLJ57(Del); 131(2006)DLT681
clause. Fourthly, he mentioned that any restraint on employment would be vocative of Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and that the ratio of the decision in the case of Pepsi Foods Ltd and Ors. v. Bharat
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishan Murgai Vs. Superintendence Company of India (P) Ltd.
Delhi
Jul-20-1979
Service
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27
AIR1979Delhi232
it to sustain the temporary injunction.7. Our reasons for this conclusion are as below: Section 27 of the Contract Act, 1872, reads as under:'Every agreement by which any one is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuperintendence Company of India (P) Ltd. Vs. Sh. Krishan Murgai
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-1980
Service
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 28 and 56
AIR1980SC1717; [1980(41)FLR137]; (1981)ILLJ121SC; (1981)2SCC246; [1980]3SCR1278
illustrations (c) and (d) to Section 57 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, despite Section 27 of the Contract Act, 1872 3. Whether, and to what extent, the provisions of Section 27 of the Contract Act are subject to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Percept D'Markr (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-22-2006
ArbitrationContract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Companies Act, 1956; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 36; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(1), 41 and 42; Arbitration and Conciliation Rules
AIR2006SC3426; 2006(2)ARBLR34(SC); 2006(2)AWC1869(SC); 2006(5)BomCR322; (2006)5CompLJ224(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ100(SC); (2006)4MLJ1695; 2006(3)SCALE324; (2006)4SCC227
Pvt. Ltd. and the respondent No. 1 - Zaheer Khan is void under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 has been in restraint of trade. It was submitted by learned senior counsel for the appellant - Mr.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmerican Express Bank Ltd. Vs. Ms. Priya Puri
Delhi
May-24-2006
CivilBanking
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Specific Relief Act - Sections 14 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4
[2006(110)FLR1061]; (2006)IIILLJ540Del
in the contract of her appointment is restraint of trade specially after her resignation and is prohibitive under Section 27 of the Contract Act and such restraint or restriction violates and seriously impinge upon the defendant's fundamental right … other country, it may not be permissible to import the principles enunciated in different environments and laws. The Contract Act,1872 is quite exhaustive even if it may not be a complete code dealing with all the eventualities pertaining
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHukmi Chand Vs. Jaipur Ice and Oil Mills Co. and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-27-1980
Commercial
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 36, 54, 55 and 55(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 40
AIR1980Raj155; 1980()WLN200
reasonable or not, we will like to deal with the law codified in Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as the Contract Act) and Sections 36, 54 and 55 of the Indian Partnership Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskZaheer Khan Vs. Percept D' Mark (India) Private Limited and Anr.
Mumbai
Dec-19-2003
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 42
AIR2004Bom362; 2004(2)ALLMR369; IV(2004)BC181; (2006)3CompLJ253(Bom)
completion of the contract, is in the restraint of trade and, therefore, void under Section 27 of the Contract Act, 1872. Clause 31 of the agreement provides thus : '31. NEGOTIATION AND RIGHTS OF FIRST REFUSAL:(a) NEGOTIATION :-- During
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMundipharma Ag Vs. Wockhardt Ltd.
Delhi
Sep-11-1990
Intellectual Property RightsArbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961; Copyright Act, 1957; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27
ILR1991Delhi606
of its various preparations as envisaged under the agreement would be hit by section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which says every agreement by which any one is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPercept D'Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.
Mumbai
Dec-10-2003
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27
2004(1)ALLMR384; 2004(2)BomCR47; (2006)5CompLJ271(Bom)
common law principle applicable in England while it has a statutory recognition under section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. While construing the provisions of section 27 of the Contract Act, the High Courts in India have held
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford, Tradi ...
Delhi
Dec-19-2002
Intellectual Property RightsContract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Copyright Act - Sections 22
103(2003)DLT139; 2003(67)DRJ184; 2003(26)PTC186(Del)
dated 24th August 1994 is in restraint of trade and, thus, void ab-initio under Section 27 of the Contract Act, 1872. It is claimed that act of authoring Volumes 2 and 3 in question by defendant No. 3 for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »