Advanced Search Results

National Bank of Lahore Ltd. Vs. Sohan Lal Saigal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Banking

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 235 and 238; Indian Limitation Act - Articles 36, 49, 95 and 120; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Law; Roman Civil Law

Reported in : AIR1962P& H534

in those lockers, could not be said to fall within the ambit of Section 238 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, nor were they of such a nature as could be regarded to have been done in the course

Bappu Rawther Abdul Kassim Rawther Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17, 65, 75 and 238; Revenue Recovery Act;

Reported in : AIR1964Ker109

I make no order as to costs. Contract - title - Sections 17, 65, 75 and 238 of Contract Act, 1872 and Revenue Recovery Act - respondent auctioned property of assessee for recovery of taxes - appellant purchased property … not vitiated by fraud, the only extent, to which the purchaser can claim relief, is that indicated by section 315........'But in order to make out a case of fraud against the State it must be proved that

Firm Rupram Kailash Nath Vs. Co-operative Union and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 237 and 238

Reported in : AIR1967All382

of the decree passed by thetrial court. Contract - liability of principal - Sections 237 and 238 of Contract Act, 1872 - principal liable to third party for torts and negligence of his agent in the course of agency … such third persons to believe that such acts and obligations were within the scope of the agent's authority. Section 238. Misrepresentations made, or frauds committed, by agents acting in the course of their business for their principals, have

Rhodia Ltd. and ors. Vs. Neon Laboratories Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 9A and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Maharashtra Amendment) Act; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 46; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR2002Bom502; 2003(1)BomCR140; 2003(1)MhLj373

tribunals in India to be ousted. For this purpose, reliance is placed on Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as well as on the decision of the Delhi High Court in : AIR1991Delhi285 in Rajendra Sethia v.

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Amit Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Resolution Plan cannot contravene any provision of law which is in force. The provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (―Contract Act‖), require mutual agreement of the parties for such a modification; (vi) The submission of the respondents … CIRP under the IBC is 330 days; and (ii) The PPA is an ‗instrument‘ within the meaning of Section 238 of the IBC. The clauses of the PPA are inconsistent with the provisions of the IBC, and stand

Way2 Wealth Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Amar Walmiki

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Respondent of the agreement with the Appellant. In view of the explanation to Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the Tribunal was justified in considering, while estimating the loss or damages from a breach of contract, the … of the tribunal exercising jurisdiction to apply the principle of mitigation of damages; (ii) The provisions of Bye-law 238(a) confer a discretion on a member of the Stock Exchange to close out the account of the constituent

Uv Asset Reconstruction Company Limited versus Electrosteel Castings L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 130

of Undertaking; and whether Clause 2.2 constitutes a contract of guarantee within the meaning of s.126 of the Contract Act, 1872 thereby rendering ECL as a guarantor to SREI in respect of financial facilities availed by ESL from SREI.Headnotes†Insolvency … Kartik Pandey, Ms. Nitika Grover, Nishant Anshul.Judgment / Order of the Supreme CourtJudgmentAlok Aradhe, J.INTRODUCTION1. This appeal under Section 62 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,2016 (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘Code’) calls in question the legality and

M/S Shakti Residency Pvt. Ltd. Vs.sanjiv Anand & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

per express terms of the Agreement to Sell dated 16.02.2012 as well as per Section 74 of the Contract Act, 1872.” (emphasis supplied).23. The plaintiff avers that even if, for the sake of arguments, it were to be accepted … fact………” 29. Mr. Malhotra has also placed reliance on Dau Alakhram Vs. Mt. Kulwantin Bai & Another, AIR1950Nagpur 238. The Division Bench of the High Court in this decision observed as follows: FAO(OS) 9/2017 Page 14 of

Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons Private Limited Vs. Edelweiss Asset Reconst ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of such person goes as far the liability of the principal debtor. As per Section 128 of the Contract Act, 1872, the liability of the surety is co­ex­ tensive with that of the principal debtor and the creditor may … case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd.10, in view of provisions of Section 238 of I&B Code, the provisions thereof will have an overriding effect, if there is any inconsistency with any

Ritika Awasty Vs. Hassad Netherlands Bv and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

husband who made the false representations. In paragraph 100 of the award the Arbitral Tribunal has referred to Section 238 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which fastens liability upon the principle for frauds committed by the agent. … Arbitral Tribunal declared the share purchase agreement dated March 09, 2013 void under Section 19(1) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and awarded damages to respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the sum of US$ 284,943.83 and US$ 2,171,951.86, with