Advanced Search Results

S. Ananda and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Pension Rules - Rule 44; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 14(5), 20 and 22; Madras State Subordinate Service General Rules - Rule 9; Punjab Municipal Act - Sections 236

Reported in : (1983)IILLJ277Mad

20 and 22 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, Rule 9 of Madras State Subordinate Service General Rules and Section 236 of Punjab Municipal Act - whether Government by passing subsequent Order entitled to withdraw terminal benefits offered by … in G.O.Ms. No. 731, Industries, dated 21.5.1974 is void and unenforceable as per Section 20 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 because it has been passed by a mistake and is not based on free consent, as per section

Sheo Nath Prasad Vs. Sarjoo Nonia and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilBanking

Reported in : AIR1943All220

91 absolutely nugatory. Sir Wazir Hasan C. J. has based his conclusions on the provisions of Section 70, Contract Act, 1872, which runs as follows:Where a person lawfully does anything for another person, or delivers anything to him not … since Sir Richard Garth enunciated the two following propositions in Sheikh Akbar v. Sheikh, Khan ('81) 7 Cal. 236:1. When a cause of action for money is once complete in itself, whether for goods sold, or for

Narsingdas Takhatmal Vs. Radhakisan Rambakas and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 9

Reported in : (1952)54BOMLR492

then dealt with the argument that the representation found proved amounted to fraud as defined in Section 17(3), Contract Act, 1872.That contention was also overruled, because there was no finding that the defendant at the time of making the … and the judgment of their Lordships is reported in Maung Kyin v. Ma Shwe La, 44 Ind. App. 236 (P. C.). Their Lordships were of the opinion that as between the parties to an absolute conveyance Section

Ramchandra Lalbhai Vs. Chinubhai Lalbhai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR1075

No. 1 by defendant is revocable as it is not coupled with interest; Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.13. V.F. Taraporevala. Chinubhai Lalbhai & Bros., Ltd., was formed as a device to get capital and deposits for … Ch. D. 462 De Bussche v. Alt (1877-78) 8 Ch. D. 286 Story on Agency, 9th edn., p. 236, 207; and Nensukhdas v. Birdichand (1917) 19 Bom. L.R. 948. There is no difference whatever in the legal

Kerala Electrical and Allied Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Canara Bank and ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : BankingCommercial

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Limitation Act

Reported in : AIR1980Ker151

6 months from the date of expiry of the guarantee is hit by Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.3. Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads:'28. Every agreement, by which any party thereto is restricted … Section 28, Contract Act, nor Article 86, Limitation Act.'In Pearl Insurance Co. v. Atma Ram, (AIR 1960 Punj 236 (FB)) a clause in an insurance policy which said that in no case whatever shall the company be

Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd Vs. Union of India

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

the respondent, which has already been extracted ` supra, satisfies the requirements of Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act 1872. Section 4 reads as under:  “4. Communication when complete- The communication of an acceptance is complete...as against the acceptor, … in Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Gandhi Industrial Corporation, reported in (2007) 13 SCC 236. 114. Therein a concluded contract was inferred having regard to factual matrix involved therein that the respondent despite

National Highways Authority of India vs.emas Expressway Pvtltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

failure to give notice and whether for that purpose, the 3rd proviso to Section 55 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 (ICA) would apply. The AT concluded that time was not the essence of the contract. Therefore, it was

M/S.Ganesh Cotton Traders., Rep. by Its Proprietor Vs. the General Man ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

The learned counsel, in support of his contention, relies on the provision under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. In this case, it is not in dispute that a cheque for an amount of Rs.24,15,365/- was issued … learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent-bank in the case of S.KotrabasappaV. The Indian Bank (AIR 1987 KARNATAKA 236), would support the case of 3rd respondent. In the aforesaid judgment, while interpreting the scope of Section 72

Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd vs.rentworks India Pvt. Ltd. & O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

is unable to immediately state.11. The counsel for the defendant no.1 refers to Section 20 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 to contend that the Closure Agreement dated 4th September, 2018 is void, since both the plaintiff as well

Sewdutt Roy Maskara Vs. Nahapiet

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1907)ILR34Cal628

costs on scale No. 2. Principal and Agent--Contract--Contract with Broker acting as Principal Specific Performance--Contract Act (IX of 1872) Section 236. -