Advanced Search Results

Bhagwan Dei Vs. Murari Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1917)ILR39All51

question of the validity or otherwise of this contract depends upon the terms of Section 23 of the Contract Act, The words 'opposed to public policy' add nothing to, and detract nothing from, the common law, and must … to a patwari is void under Section 23 of Act IX of 1872 as opposed to public policy. The point is not a new one. … son, the patwari, and have dismissed the suit on the ground that the assignment was against public policy. Section 234 of the Laud Revenue Act provides that the Board of Revenue may, from lime to time, subject to

Musammat Bhagwan Dei Vs. Pandit Murari Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1917All462; 36Ind.Cas.259

in the lower Appellate Court. All other costs will be costs in the cause. Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 23 - Contract opposed to public policy, when--U.P. Land Revenue Act (III of 1901), Section 234--Rules framed by … question of the validity or otherwise of this contract depends upon the terms of Section 23 of the Contract Act. The words 'opposed to public policy add nothing to, and detract nothing from, the common law, and must,

Bharat Hari Singhania and Others Vs. Sushila Singhania and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court, Bombay. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Order 21, Rule 1 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Contract Act, 1872 Section 52 Vacant possession Execution of award Applicant sought to execute Arbitrator award, wherein Applicant Group receive vacant and … get their due simultaneously. Mr. Tulzapurkar also relied upon Shiv Chander Kapoor vs. Amar Bose (1990 (1) SCC 234). Relying on this judgment, Mr. Tulzapurkar submitted that where there is an exception, it must be strictly construed

The Club, Mahabaleshwar Vs. the Municipality of Mahableshwar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other taxes

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR52

price there is.... A sale involves the element of a bargain. There was no bargain here, nor any contract with Graff (the Manager of the club) with respect to the goods. Foster was acting upon his rights … rule, and;that, therefore, the club was not liable to pay any tax under the rule. - INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 Section 24: [V.S. Sirpurkar & Deepak Verma,JJ] Dying declaration - Multiple murders by accused - Dying declaration not implicating … Lords in Railway Assessment Authority v. Great 'Western Railway Co. [1948] A.C. 234. The question that arose for consideration in that case was whether a

Shyam Sunder Lal Vs. Lakshmi NaraIn Mathur

Court : Allahabad

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 7, 7A and 17; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Rules - Rule 4; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 65; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1961All347

Section 7 (2) of U. P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 and Section 65 of Contract Act, 1872 - agreement to let accommodation - entered in contravention of Section 7 (2) - agreement is void - … whether the power to make rules relating to the appointment, dismissal and so forth of a patwari, under Section 234 confers any right to qualify the general law with regard to contracts or anything else, and I think

Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited vs Anand Engineering Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

statutes, rules, notification, etc. since long, and is also a part of common law. Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 uses the expression by stating that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, inter alia,

Tilokchand and Motichand and ors. Vs. H.B. Munshi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Secrtion 80; Indian Contract Act - Sections 72; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 12-A(4); Limitation Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1970SC898; (1969)1SCC110; [1969]2SCR824; [1970]25STC289(SC)

under Art. 32 of the Constitution claiming refund of Rs. 26,563.50 P under s. 72 of the Indian Contract Act 1872. They alleged that they paid this sum to the Collector under coercion and/or mistake of law, and that … Tax Officer v. Kanhaiyalal(3) that money paid under a mistake of law comes within the word 'mistake' in section 72 of the Contract Act and there is no question of estopped when the mistake of law is … 261. 273-74. (2) [1963] Supp. 1 S.C.R. 99, 111. [1851-52] 5 M.I.A., 234. 251. (4) [1962] 1 S.C.R. 574. firm contended that its sales of

Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited versus Santosh Cordeiro and A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 1

Bom 4176 - referred to.List of Acts Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; Contract Act, 1872. List of Keywords Section 11(6A), Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996; Section 41, Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; … view was adopted by this Court in Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Aksh Optifibre Ltd., (2005) 7 SCC 234].169. When the Referral Court renders a prima facie opinion,neither the Arbitral Tribunal, nor the Court enforcing the arbitral

Henderson Bridge Co. Vs. Henderson City

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the company, and that, under an ordinance of the city, accepted by the company, the city acquired a contract right to tax the bridge to low water mark on the Indiana shore, it being within the city … under an Act of the General Assembly of Kentucky approved February 9, 1872, the bridge company was incorporated and authorized to build a bridge across … 127 U. S. 216 , 127 U. S. 234 ; Hale v. Akers, 132 U. S. 554 … case is stated in the opinion. MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an action, brought in the Henderson Circuit Court of Kentucky by the City of Henderson, Kentucky, against Page 141 U. … water mark on the Indiana shore, the provision of that ordinance in section 4 being as follows: "SEC. 4. That nothing herein shall be construed

Jayaraj R. vs Kavya G Nair

Court : Kerala

agreement. There were reciprocal promises agreed by the parties, falling within the ambit of Section 51 of the Contract Act, which was duly performed by the appellant. The respondent on getting the custody of the children and receiving … to the respondent, who also received an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation. As per Section 2(e) of theContract Act, 1872 every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other, is an agreement. There were … discussed above.” (underline supplied)21. In Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar [(2011)5 SCC 234], a Two-Judge Bench of the Apex Court was dealing with a case