Advanced Search Results

State of Gondal Vs. Govindram Seksaria

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyContract

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR822

having regard to Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to which I will presently refer.12. The whole of the purchase price being paid, plaintiff No. 1 was … See Brickies v. Snell [1916] 2 A.C. 599 and Hailes and Hutchinson's Contract, In re [1920] 1 Ch. 233. Although the Maharaja,, no doubt, was to procure the concurrence of the trustees as conveying parties, on the

Ghanta Infrastructures Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1941 - Sections 22 and 22(3); Assam Control Order, 1961; Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939; Company Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 79; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19(1), 32, 226 and 300A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of the Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 78(2) and 81; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4A, 81, 91, 100, 190, 224 to 233, 235 to 351, 391-394, 433, 617, 619 and 643; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Industrial Courts Act, 1919; Industries (Development and Regulation Act, 1951; International Finance Corporation (Status, Immunities and Privileges) Act, 1958; Madras Agriculturalists' Relief Act; Recovery of

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT611

of the Act specifies:Words and expression used and not defined in this Act but defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872) or the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882) or the Companies Act, 1956 … 619 of the said Act dealing with Application of Sections 224 - 233 to Government Companies, reads as hereunder:(1) In the case of a Government … Reserve Bank of India. The learned senior Counsel while further elaborating his submissions had specifically pointed out to Sections 9 and 13 of the Act and also placed strong reliance on several decisions to substantiate his stand

Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited vs Anand Engineering Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

statutes, rules, notification, etc. since long, and is also a part of common law. Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 uses the expression by stating that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, inter alia,

Jyotsna K. Valia Vs. T.S. Parekh and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 2(1), 7, 9, 10, 25, 25(3) and 70; Limitation Act - Sections 18 and 19; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 33, 34 and 37; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 35; Central Sales Tax Act; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2; Sale of Goods Act; Marine Insurance Act; Specific Relief Act; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Article 64; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rules 1, 2 and 2(2)

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR718; 2007(3)BomCR772; 2007(4)CTC257; 2007(4)MhLj517; 2007(5)AIRKarR180; AIR2007NOC2237(FB)(Bom)

need to be considered. Let us first understand the expression 'Contract in Writing' Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as reproduced below sets out, what agreements are contracts:10. What agreements are contracts. All agreements are contracts if … of creditor to receive and enforce payment'. (State v. Ducey) 25 Dhio App. 2d 50, 266 N.E. 2d. 233, 235....A fixed and certain obligation to pay money or some other valuable thing or things, either in the

Laxmibai and anr. Vs. Keshav Annaji Pokharkar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1916Bom239; 33Ind.Cas.396

substitute real for merely nominal contracting party, if admissible--Fraud--Benami transaction, nature of--Parol evidence, admissibility of--Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 233. - Section 3: [S.B. Mhase, D.S. Bhosale & A.S. Oka, JJ] Offences of atrocities - Complaint under Held,

V. Krishnamurthy Vs. M/s. Kasthuri and Sons Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

liable to be rejected. 9. In support of the contention put forth on the side of the appellant/defendant, Section 233 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 is relied upon and the same reads as follows: 233. Right of … Bench of this Court is relied upon wherein this Court has dealt with Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads as follows: 230. Agent cannot personally enforce, nor be bound

Bhupender Sharma Vs. M/S.National Panasonic India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

significance..40. Now, a comment upon the impugned decision..41. With reference to Section 186, Section 188, Section 197 and Section 233 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, the learned Single Judge has held there was an implied authority from … Contract Act in respect of the decreed amount. Decree sheet be drawn accordingly.".2. Section 223 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 reads as under:- "Where one person employs another to do an act, and the agent does the act

Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. Vs. Umbehr

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT No. 94-1654. Argued November 28, 1995-Decided June 28,1996 During the term of his at-will contract with Wabaunsee County, Kansas (County), to haul trash, respondent Umbehr was an outspoken critic of petitioner Board of … atmosphere uninhibited by the usual challenges of representative government," Tolchin, supra, at 233, and that in many cases they were illegal, see Heard, supra, at … (c) Because the courts below assumed that Umbehr's termination (or nonrenewal) was in retaliation for his protected speech activities, and did not pass on the balance between the government's interests and his free speech interests, the conclusion … specificity, how the entire contracting process will be conducted." ABA General Practice Section, Federal Procurement Regulations: Policy, Practice and Procedures 1 (1987). That is why

Kalundaivelu Pillai Vs. Ramasami Naicker and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 72Ind.Cas.770

regards 2nd defendant by the dismissal of the suit against him with costs throughout. Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 233 - Payment by debtor to agent of creditor--Misappropriation by agent--Debtor, whether entitled to recover amount from agent. -

Miss Moselle Solomon Vs. MartIn and Co.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 163Ind.Cas.331

tanto of the decree in the former suit. Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 70, 233, 43 - Scope of Act--Rules of justice, equity and … it is an authority on which we can base a decision in India. The present case comes under Section 233 of the Contract Act which states that incases where an agent is personally liable, a person dealing with … entitled to recover half the cost of the work from Miss Moselle Solomon under Section 70 of the Contract Act inasmuch as the circumstances show that she, as owner of the half share in the premises, took delivery