Advanced Search Results

Raj and Associates and anr. Vs. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 230, 231 and 232; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 8, 8(1) and 8(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 8, Rule 6A

Reported in : 2004(2)ARBLR614(Delhi); I(2005)BC509; 113(2004)DLT318; 2004(76)DRJ60

improperly joined, whether as Plaintiff or Defendant, be struck off.6. A reading of Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 will clarify that RITES is not a necessary party in these proceedings as it enunciates that in the … into by him on behalf of his principal, nor is he personally bound by them. Sections 231 and 232 carves out a pragmatic and mercantile exception in that if the agent has not disclosed his principal, or

Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited vs Anand Engineering Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

statutes, rules, notification, etc. since long, and is also a part of common law. Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 uses the expression by stating that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, inter alia,

Oracle International Corporation vs Cis IT Solutions Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

statutes, rules, notification, etc. since long, and is also a part of common law. Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 uses the expression by stating that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, inter alia, … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 07.05.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026+ O.M.P. (COMM) 232/2024 ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through: Ms Swathi Sukumar, Sr. Adv. with Ms Priyanka Gupta, Mr Aasheesh Gupta, Mr

independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mr. Anuraag Muskaan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the agreement dated 16 th January, 2012 amounts to a restraint of trade under Section 27 of the Contract Act, 1872 apart from being against the public policy as he tendered his resignation on 8th February, 2013 strictly as … discussed in detail in the case of Krishan Murgai Vs. Superintendence Company of India (P) Ltd., AIR 197.Delhi 232. Para 9 reads as under:9. The Courts in India have approached the construction of S. 27 in the

Malabar Carpet Export vs Tiger Logistics (India) Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was not acting on the instructions of the Plaintiff Firm.31. In terms of Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an agentcannot personally enforce, nor be bound by, contracts on behalf of the principal. Section 232 of the

Alka Ceramics Vs. Gujarat State Financial Corporation and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 3, 4, 29, 29(1), 31, 31(1) and 44; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 300A and 311; Gujarat Public Money (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 - Sections 3(4); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 58 and 69; Banker's Books Evidence Act, 1891 - Sections 46B; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172 and 176; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14B; Punjab Municipalities Act - Sections 14 and 16(1); Army Act - Sections 125; Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act - Sections 3; Gujarat Public Money Recovery of Dues Act - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : AIR1990Guj105; [1992]73CompCas209(Guj); (1985)1GLR57; (1990)1GLR628; (1990)1GLR628

of sale without intervention of the Court under section 69. Similarly, sections 172 and 176 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, provide for bailments or pledges. Section 176 gives a right to sell the property pledged after giving a … court is sought, either by putting in force any attachment, distress or execution within the meaning of section 232(1) or proceeding with or commencing a suit or other legal proceedings against the company within the meaning of

Toepfer International Asia Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Thapar Ispat Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 47, 49 and 82; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Grain and Feed Trade Association (Singapore) Rules - Rules 2.2, 4 and 82

Reported in : 1999(4)BomCR415; (1999)2BOMLR890

deliver goods as per the requirement of the petitioner. Negotiations took place with regard to terms of a contract for supply of 1000 Metric Tons of Indian Toasted Soyabeen Extraction FAQ yellow Flacks of certain specification. The … principle sum from the date of award till payment or realisation of the same sum. - INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 Section 24: [V.S. Sirpurkar & Deepak Verma,JJ] Dying declaration - Multiple murders by accused - Dying declaration not implicating … the default price on the date of selling (25-6-1996) of US $ 232 per metric tone and the contractual price of US $ 192 per

Sree Raja Datla Venkata Suryanaraina Jagapatiraju Bahadur Garu and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : 7Ind.Cas.60

person acquires no rights and incurs no liability under the contract (see Sections 231 and 232 of the Contract Act). It may be that though such a person is really an agent in the matter of the contract, … purchaser benamidar for another--Right to sue for cancellation of sale on the ground of fraud--Trustee--Benamidar--Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 231, 232--Agent--Undisclosed principal--Limitation Act (XV of 1877), Schedule II. Articles 12, 95, 120--Limitation. - … recover the property from the latter and that to such a case Section 95 of the Limitation Act did not apply. The other cases cited

Sheo NaraIn Vs. Bhallar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 30, 182, 231, 232 and 233

Reported in : AIR1950All352

Bom. 715 : (A. I. R. (2) 1916 Bom. 115), the defendant had taken the plea that the contracts sued upon were not entered into and in the alternative if the contracts were proved to have been … the case made by the plaintiff. It only becomes possible on the assumption that the alleged cause of action is unfounded.'In spite of these observations, however, his Lordship went on to consider the issue whether the hibanama

Smt. Sujatha and ors. Vs. H.M. Mallappa Naik and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 165(1), 166, 168 and 212; Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 232; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 74

Reported in : I(2003)ACC56; 2003ACJ791; ILR2002KAR675; 2002(2)KarLJ358

victim or victims as the case may be. The basic principle for damagesin tort as well as in contract is that there should be restitution in integrum. The object of award of damages is to give the … the award to the sum claimed in the claim petition, which is against the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act, as the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act has given wide powers to the Tribunal to make just … remedy. The question which needs an answer is:Whether the claim arising under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act is an action for unliquidated damages'?A