Advanced Search Results

United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman, Chennai and Ot ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

acts of the agent, when the agent exceeds his authority. 21. Section 227 and 228 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads as follows : "227. Principal how far bound, when agent exceeds authority - When an agent does

Gulam HussaIn Ahmedali and Co. Vs. Trustees of the Port of Trust, Bomb ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19(1) and 228; Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 4, 61A(1), 61A(2), 61B, 73 and 87; Indian Ports Act, 1875; Port Trusts and Port (Amendment) Act, 1951; Indian Railways Act, 1890; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Sections 112 and 135; Madras-Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 40 and 111; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 36

Reported in : AIR1963Bom45; (1962)64BOMLR670; ILR1963Bom35

1890 (9 of 1890) be that of a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), omitting the words 'in the absence of any special contract' in section 152 of the … view of this defence, the plaintiffs applied to this Court for a transfer of the suit under Article 228 of the Constitution on the ground that, in the plaintiffs' submission, Section 87 of the Bombay Port Trust

Jwala Prasad Vs. Jwala Bank Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 32, 56 and 63; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Article 116; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 456, 457 and 528; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 83A, 178, 179 and 228

Reported in : AIR1957All143

laid before the Bench concernedalong with this judgment. Contract - service - Sections 63 and 19 of the Contract Act, 1872 and Article 116 of Limitation Act, 1908 - whether a director of a company in liquidation can claim … 6 page654). The appellant's debt therefore will have to be evaluated as at the date of winding-up under Section 228 of the Companies Act after making a deduction for the fact that he is now free to do

Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Sourabh Market ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CommercialIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; Copy Right Act, 1957 - Sections 1 to 6, 9 to 12, 13 to 21, 13(1 and 7), 19-A, 19-A(2), 22 to 29, 30 to 32-B, 33 to 36-A, 37 to 39-A, 44 to 50-A, 51 to 53-A, 53-A(3), 54 to 62, 71 to 73, 72(2) and 74 to 79; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 10, 14 to 16 and 30; Indian Copyright Act, 1914; Copyright Act, 1911; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 345 and 346; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Indian Contract Act, 1872

Reported in : ILR2000KAR5057; 2001(4)KarLJ78

words, these agreements are nothing but the lawful contracts within the meaning of Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and, therefore, in essence, the plaintiffs suit against defendant is instituted for enforcement of the contractual rights and … all proceedings before it shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code. Since the Board is declared to be a Civil Court for this limited

M/S National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Itd-Sdb(jv)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

also advert to a contention advanced, based on the provisions of Section 2278 and 2289 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (in short „Contract Act‟). Based on the said provisions, it is argued that NHAI cannot be called upon … the principal is not bound by the acts done by an agent beyond the authority conferred on him. Section 228 adverts to a situation that where an agent acts outside the scope of his authority and the unauthorized

Prudential Capital Markets Ltd., Calcutta Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConsumerConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 3, 12 and 27(1); Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10-E and 58-A; Reserve Bank of India Act - Sections 45-Q and 45-QA; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; CLB Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections - 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections - 193, 195, 196 and 228; Banking Laws (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1963; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections - 34; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections - 9;

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD418; 2000(5)ALT468; [2002]108CompCas441(AP)

the contention is not well founded. Parliament is aware of the provisions of the Arbitration Act and the Contract Act, 1872 and the consequential remedy available under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure i.e., to avail of … proceeding before the Forum shall be deemed to be judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of Indian Penal Code. Apart from this, the Act in Section 27 lays down the procedure for Inking

Nutan Kumar and Others Vs. Iind Additional District Judge, Banda and O ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : TenancyContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 3, 10, 12 and 23 to 30; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6, 105 and 108; Constitution of India - Article 13, 13(3) and 141; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 7(2); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 15, 15(1), 16, 16(1), 17, 17(1) and 31; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 15; Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949; Specific Relief Act; Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929; Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1969 - Sections 5(8); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 166; Uttar P

Reported in : AIR1994All298

relating to all agreements constituting subsratum Of a valid contract are subject to and governting by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, hereinafter called the Contract Act.3. Clauses (h) and (g) of Section 2 of the Contract Act declare that … of an 'agreement' - (See Pollack and Mulla on 'Indian Contract and Specific Relief Acts', 10th Edition, page 228).59. A 'lease' of a building involves two promises: (1) by the lessor to transfer his rightto enjoy his

The Union of India Vs. K.H. Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 73 and 74

Reported in : AIR1976SC626; (1977)1SCC583; 1976(8)LC203(SC)

operate as a penalty. But the court cannot in view of the Exception to Section 74 of the Contract Act 1872, directly relieve the plaintiff of the hardship on that score. Nevertheless, there is another feature of this case … refused to accept substitutes for onions as per the terms of the contract. The set off Rs. 18 228-11-5 made by the defendants for the alleged recovery of damages was also challenged as unwarranted, illegal and unauthorised

M/S C & C Constructions Ltd. versus Ircon International Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.1413

several decisions of this Court, he urged that the parties to the contract cannot contract against the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short, ‘the Contract Act’). He submitted that the finding recorded by the Arbitral Tribunal that clause 49.5 … granted an extension of time as follows: LC No. Extension Upto Penalty 228 20th March, 2014 With Penalty 89 28th February, 2014 With Penalty 108 … of the High Court of Delhi dated 1 st March, 2021, which is passed in an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the Arbitration Act’). 2. We refer to a

Rajender Kumar vs.rama Bala Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a breach of contract gives right to remedy and relief of damages under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Specific performance is the alternative to the relief of damages and Courts have in view of Section 20 … also refer to the judgment titled as “Shree Aadhiya Build Well Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kartar Singh & Ors, 228 (2016) Delhi Law Times 10, wherein the Hon'ble Court has observed as under:(cid:173) “9. Onus of this issue