Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 225 · Page 1 of about 178 results (0.065 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 20 1931

Poona Bank Ltd. Vs. Kachhi Dasa Oswal JaIn Temple

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-1931

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1932Bom31

attention.' The definition in the General Clauses Act 10 of 1897, cannot apply to the Contract Act of 1872. Even assuming that the words 'done in good faith 'be understood in the sense of 'done honestly whether … a lawful pawnee and having acted in good faith was entitled to the protection afforded by Section 178, Contract Act, and therefore the pledge was valid and passed a decree in favour of the plaintiff for recovery of … been held in the case of Shankar v. Lakshmibai A.I.R. 1928 Bom. 225 following the previous decisions on this point that the word 'possession' in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1966

Superintendent and Legal Remembrancer, State of West Bengal Vs. Corpor ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-07-1966

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections Sections 115, 167(2), 218, 218(1), 512, 537, 541, 541(1), 541(2) and 547A; ;Constitution of India - Articles 25, 32, 136, 226, 298, 300, 372 and 544; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 385(1), 386(1), 421 and 488; Common Law; Constitutional Law; Interpretation Act; Crown Proceedings Act; City of Bombay Municipal Act, 1888 - Sections 212, 222(1), 265, 305, 489 and 491; Indian Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 26 - Schedule - Articles 167 and 178; City of Madras Municipal Act, 1884 - Sections 341; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 110, 208(1) and 225(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections - 74; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(2) and 90; Indian Easements Act - Sections 2; The Crown Grant

Reported in : AIR1967SC997; 1967CriLJ950; [1967]2SCR170

bound unless the contrary is stated. Many Acts like the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Indian Contract Act 1872 make special provisions for the Government in respect of particular matters on the assumption that in respect of … for the year 1960-61, the Government of West Bengal did not take out a licence under the said section but carried on the said trade. The main contention of the Government was that the State was not … to the Government from payment of tax on carriages and animals. Section 225(1) (c) proviso exempts carts which are the property of the Government from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1998

Supreme Paper Mills Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Owners and other persons Intere ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-06-1998

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1980 -- Sections 20; Admiralty Court Act, 1861; Letters Patent Act, 1865; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891 -- Sections 2; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890; The Government of India Act, 1915; The Government of India Act, 1935 -- Sections 220 and 223; Indian Contract Act, 1872 -- Sections 23 and 28; Consititution of India -- Articles 225 and 226

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC85

Contract - breach - Section 20 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sections 23 and 28 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Articles 225 and 226 of Constitution of India - plaintiff placed orders for import of goods -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 2009

Ch. Krishnaiah S/O. Balaramaiah Vs. Ch. Prasada Rao S/O. Jwala Ramaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-14-2009

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 97 and 97(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 32 and 32(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 16(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 25, 29(1), 29(2) and 29(3); Constitution of India - Articles 225, 227 and 227(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 97, 121, 122 and 128 - Order 20, Rule 11(2) - Order 21, Rules 23, 23(1), 37, 38, 105, 106, 106(1) and 106(3)

Reported in : AIR2010AP19; 2009(6)ALT82

An analysis of the save would show that (i) Limitation Act shall not affect Section 25 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, (ii) If a special law or local law prescribed period of limitation different from the period prescribed as … courts and Tribunals subordinate to it. This power has been recognized by Constitution of India by enacting Articles 225 and 227. Under Article 227(2)(b) power is conferred on High Court to make and issue general rules and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2019

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs.noble Chartering Inc.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-28-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

same without any liability, would render the Clause void under Section 23, 28 and 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.13. As far as the quantification of damages is concerned, the Arbitrator found that the damages calculated on the … * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 225/2018 & IA71362018 Reserved on:20. 12.2018 Date of decision :28. 02.2019 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through:

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2012

Landmark Developers and Others Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-06-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

agree upon the terms, upon the subject matter, the consideration and the promise. Section 20 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that where both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of … from the fifth respondent i.e. application dated 2.3.2007 in respect of 1.00 hectare of land in survey nos. 225/120 and 264/1; application dated 28.4.2007 in respect of 1.00 hectate of land in survey no.225/120, and application dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 1959

Sorabji Hormusha Joshi and Co. Vs. V.M. Ismail and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-18-1959

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 13(1), 15, 16, 16(2), 41 and 471; English Sale of Goods Act, 1893; Uniform Sales Act; Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1953; Sale of Goods and Partnership Act, 1950; Sale of Goods Act (India and Pakistan), 1957;

Reported in : AIR1960Mad520

these points is the same in England, U. S. A. and India.(7) Before the passing of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the rules of English law, including those in the Statute of Frauds were applied within the limits of … Mc. Kenzie and Co. (1919) Ltd. v. Nagendranath ILR (1946) 1 Cal 225 : 50 Cal WN 213. This condition exists in regard to patent … English Sales of Goods Act was given by Mellor, K., in Jones v. Just, (1868) 3 QB 197.(12) Section 15 of the Act III of 1930 covers sale by description as in the case here where the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2016

S. Palani and Others Vs. S. Bharathi Dasan (Deceased) and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-12-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

in a case of sale deed. In this context, we may refer to Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which provides that contract which need not be performed. By that provision, any novation, rescission and alteration of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2016

M/s. S.K. Metal and Co. and Another Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Ot ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-06-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

the petition was not maintainable since its relationship with the Petitioner was purely contractual. In terms of the Contract Act, 1872 and the clauses in the Bill of Lading and Carrier s Applicable Tariff, APL was entitled to be … the disputed quantity should be mutilated. 7. On 16th April 2001, the consignment was re-examined and confiscated under Section 111 of the Customs Act 1962 ( Act ). A panchnama of the same date was drawn up.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1996

Mahesh Chandra Vs. the Zila Panchayat, Mainpuri

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-08-1996

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 258; Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Samitis and Zilla Parishads Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 147, 148 to 150, 151 to 157, 158, 158(1) and (2), 159 and 160; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 10 and 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Northern India Ferries Act, 1878; Revenue Recovery Act, 1819; Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 222 to 227; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 8(8); Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act - Sections 4(7) and 58; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 225, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 287 and 289; Uttar Pradesh Town Areas Act - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1997All248; (1996)3UPLBEC1586

of auction sale, a binding contract came into existence. He placed reliance on Section 2 of the Indian Contract Act and contended that the agreement is enforceable at law. He placed reliance on Ludko Devi v. U. P. … in the Ultar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act for realisation of dues under the said Act. Section 225 thereof provides that arrears of rent, sayar or other dues in respect of properly vesting in the Central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial