Advanced Search Results

Dattatraya Shankarrao Kharde and ors. Vs. Executive Engineer, Chief Ga ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment Of Bonus Act - Sections 31A and 34; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 19, 19(2), 19(6), 25(O), 25(O)(1), 25B, 25F, 25G, 25-O, 25FFA and 25FFF; Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 28 and 30

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ395Bom; 1994(1)MhLj776

Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. 19. The expression 'agreement' as it is defined in Section 2(c) of the Contract Act, 1872, means every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other. Section 2(4) of the … in the case of Pratibha Sambaji Kubal v. Ravindra Hindustan Platinum (Pvt.) Ltd. & Ors. 1987 I LLN 224 has held that the non-compliance with the provisions of sections 25-F and 25-G and 25-H of the Industrial

Ghanta Infrastructures Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1941 - Sections 22 and 22(3); Assam Control Order, 1961; Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939; Company Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 79; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19(1), 32, 226 and 300A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of the Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 78(2) and 81; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4A, 81, 91, 100, 190, 224 to 233, 235 to 351, 391-394, 433, 617, 619 and 643; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Industrial Courts Act, 1919; Industries (Development and Regulation Act, 1951; International Finance Corporation (Status, Immunities and Privileges) Act, 1958; Madras Agriculturalists' Relief Act; Recovery of

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT611

of the Act specifies:Words and expression used and not defined in this Act but defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872) or the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882) or the Companies Act, 1956 … reappointed by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India:Provided that the limits specified in Sub-sections (1B) and (1C) of Section 224 shall apply in relation to the appointment or re-appointment of an auditor under this sub-section.(3) The Comptroller and

Parisons Roller Flours Mills Pvt.Ltd vs Cochin Port Trust Ltd

Court : Kerala

goods stored in the sheds and warehouse as stipulated by Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short 'Contract Act'). It is also contended that though the damage caused to the wheat as a … Marine Insurance R.F.A Nos.224 & 292/2005 -:7:-Company sought to subrogate to the rights of the first plaintiff invoking Section 79 of Marine Insurance Act, 1963(for short 'M.I. Act').7. During the pendency of the suit, the company was

Cochin Port Trust vs Parisons Roller Flour Mills Private Ltd

Court : Kerala

goods stored in the sheds and warehouse as stipulated by Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short 'Contract Act'). It is also contended that though the damage caused to the wheat as a … Marine Insurance R.F.A Nos.224 & 292/2005 -:7:-Company sought to subrogate to the rights of the first plaintiff invoking Section 79 of Marine Insurance Act, 1963(for short 'M.I. Act').7. During the pendency of the suit, the company was

Harmesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Maya Bai and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 60; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17, 18 and 19; Uttar Pradesh Zamidari Abolition and Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 331; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2006P& H1; (2005)141PLR853

It is further appropriate to mention that these principles flow from Sections 17 and 18 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Therefore, the appeal is absolutely ill advised and is liable to be dismissed.25. Mr. Chhabbra learned counsel has … are the Queen's Bench decisions in Lewis v. Clay, (1897)67 LJ QB 224 and Muskham Finance Ltd. v. Howard, (1963)1 OB 904.14. The principle that … M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is defendant's appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, 'the Code') challenging concurrent findings of fact recorded

Mumbai Mazdoor Sabha and anr. Vs. S.A. Patil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 19(2); Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR265; [1994(68)FLR171]; (1994)IILLJ891Bom

constitutes restraint on right of employer to pursue his trade within the contemplation of Section 27 of Indian Contract Act? I shall first summarise the relevant facts concerning Writ Petition No. 321 of 1988.(a) By this petition filed … also on the ground that the said Clause 2 offended Sections 23 and 27 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.The learned Counsel for the petitioner Union has submitted that the Industrial Court ought to have granted the above … the said order, the petitioner filed Letters Patent Appeal being Appeal No. 224 of 1985. By its order dated April 19, 1985, the Honourable Division

Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. V. Hotels Limited and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

in default could not and did not arise. It is submitted that under Section 39 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, there must be not only categorical refusal to perform by the promisor of his promise in entering but

industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. the Cannanore Spinnin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 20, 21, 29, 56, 128 and 130 to 141; Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Development and Regulations Act; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 20; Nationalisation (Sick Textile Undertakings Taking Over of Management) Act, 1972 - Sections 5, 5(1) and 5(2); Constitution of India - Article 136; Sick Industrial Companies (Industrial Provisions) Act, 1995 - Sections 22

Reported in : AIR2002SC1841; 2002(3)ALD113(SC); 2002(2)ARBLR676(SC); II(2002)BC430(SC); [2002]110CompCas685(SC); (2002)4CompLJ337(SC); JT2002(4)SC318; (2002)3MLJ144(SC); 2002(3)SCALE574;

it would also be convenient to note the true effect of Sections 139 and 140 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as well, which read as under : '139. Discharge of surety by creditor's act or omission impairing surety's … creditor has against the principal debtor, including the enforcement of every security stands statutorily recognised and incorporated in Section 141 of the Indian Contract Act as regards the discharge of a surety from liability, when the creditor

Devas Multimedia Private Limited Vs. Antrix Corporation Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

has to be addressed from the broad parameters laid down, not only in Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, but also in Section 447 read with Section 7 of the Companies Act, 2013 and keeping in mind … was with the central Government, while it is with the Tribunal under Section 213 of the 2013 Act. Section 224 (2) of the 2013 Act is 26 similar to Section 243 of the 1956 Act as it enables

Official Assignee, Madras Vs. Mercantile Bank of India, Ltd.

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

the ipsa corpora of the documents. The solution of the question depends on the true effect of S.178, Contract Act, 1872, as then in force; that section which has since been repealed by the Indian Contract (Amendment) Act, 1930, … v. Smith, 2 HLC 309. (4) Inglis v. Robertson, (1898) AC 616=67 LJ PC 108=14 TLR 517=79 LT 224. (5) Dublin City Distillery v. Doherty, (1914) AC 823=83 LJ PC 265=58 SJ 413=111 L 81. (6) North