Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 222 · Page 1 of about 187 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 01 1995

Dalmia Dairy Industries Ltd. Vs. State Trading Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-01-1995

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 222; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113

Reported in : 58(1995)DLT73; 1995(33)DRJ211

of 15% per annum on the decretal amount from the date of institution of the suit till realisation. Contract Act 1872 - Section 222 r/w 223--Indemnification of agent--for the litigation expenses incurred by him in respect of litigation arising

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 27 2006

Shri J. Ramaraj S/O Sri Jyothi Raj Vs. Iliyaz Khan S/O Janab Mohammed ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-27-2006

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 28, 118, 138, 139 and 141; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 222; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200; Karnataka Agriculture Produce Market Regulation Act

Reported in : ILR2006KAR4672

concerned, might be the principal is liable for the act of the agent. Section 222 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides that the agent can be indemnified against consequences of all lawful acts and for which the principal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 2006

J. Ramaraj Vs. Iliyaz Khan

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-27-2006

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 28, 118, 138, 139 and 141; Karnataka Agriculture Produce Market Regulation Act; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 222; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200

Reported in : IV(2007)BC175; 2007(4)KarLJ489; 2007(1)AIRKarR91; 2007CriLJ902.

concerned, might be the principal is liable for the act of the agent. Section 222 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides that the agent can be indemnified against consequences of all lawful acts and for which the principal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 17 2006

Shree Digvijay Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. the State Trading Corporation of In ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182, 185, 186, 187, 188 and 222; Import Trade Control Rules; Import Trade Control Regulations; Export Control Orders

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi276; III(2006)BC405; 2006(2)CTLJ34(Del); 128(2006)DLT319; 2006(89)DRJ207

subject to certain terms and conditions.31. Learned counsel for the plaintiff referred to Chapter 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), which deals with agency. Learned counsel referred to the provisions of … circumstances of the case. Thus if the plaintiff is the agent of the defendant then in terms of Section 222 of the said Act, the defendant is liable to indemnify the plaintiff as a consequence of all the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2004

Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and India Steamship Co. Ltd. Vs. the Union o ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-20-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(4); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 186 to 189, 222, 223 and 230

Reported in : 2005(1)CTLJ420(Mad); (2004)4MLJ599

the plaintiff.21. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants by taking us through Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 ( in short 'the Act') and various decisions would contend that in any event the first defendant, being … bound by contracts on behalf of principal, as rightly pointed out, the said provision is subject to Sections 222 and 223 of the Act. On going through those statutory provisions and the materials placed, we are satisfied

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1965

Loon Karan Sohan Lal Vs. Firm John and Co. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-12-1965

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4, 23 and 32; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182 and 222

Reported in : AIR1967All308

appropriated to contract by buyer. (iii) Contract - principal and agent relationship - Sections 182 and 222 of Contract Act, 1872 - omission or use of word 'agent' not conclusive proof of relationship of agent and principal - crucial … in the second, he merely acts at the request of another. Then again in the first case, under Section 222 the person is entitled to be indemnified against the consequences of all lawful acts done by him in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1961

K. Muneyya and Co. Represented by the Partner A.R. Subramanyam Iyyar V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-26-1961

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 18 and 101 to 104; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 221 and 222

Reported in : AIR1964AP17

of agent - Sections 18 and 101 to 104 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 221and 222 of Contract Act, 1872 - appellant booked goods and paid freight to railway on behalf of defendant - goods lost in transit … the price of goods. Indeed they had an agent's lien on the principal's property within the meaning of Section 221 of the Contract Act. If the goods are lost in transit under the circumstances beyond control while

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 1975

C.V. George and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-27-1975

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(7), 2(31) and 222(2)

Reported in : [1976]102ITR724(Ker)

this Sub-rule shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the provisions of Section 247 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. (2) Where the decree-holder claims to be entitled to cause the decree to be executed against any person … that falls for decision in this writ petition is whether the term 'assessee' occurring in Sub-section (1) of Section 222 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act 43 of 1961), hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', in the context

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1966

Superintendent and Legal Remembrancer, State of West Bengal Vs. Corpor ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-07-1966

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections Sections 115, 167(2), 218, 218(1), 512, 537, 541, 541(1), 541(2) and 547A; ;Constitution of India - Articles 25, 32, 136, 226, 298, 300, 372 and 544; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 385(1), 386(1), 421 and 488; Common Law; Constitutional Law; Interpretation Act; Crown Proceedings Act; City of Bombay Municipal Act, 1888 - Sections 212, 222(1), 265, 305, 489 and 491; Indian Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 26 - Schedule - Articles 167 and 178; City of Madras Municipal Act, 1884 - Sections 341; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 110, 208(1) and 225(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections - 74; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(2) and 90; Indian Easements Act - Sections 2; The Crown Grant

Reported in : AIR1967SC997; 1967CriLJ950; [1967]2SCR170

bound unless the contrary is stated. Many Acts like the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Indian Contract Act 1872 make special provisions for the Government in respect of particular matters on the assumption that in respect of … for the year 1960-61, the Government of West Bengal did not take out a licence under the said section but carried on the said trade. The main contention of the Government was that the State was not … case the question was whether the Crown was not bound by s. 222(1) and s. 265 of the City of Bombay Municipal Act, 1888 which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1990

O.M. Agency (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-18-1990

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 186, 187, 188 and 222

Reported in : ILR1991KAR2543

till the date of realisation. The plaintiff is also entitled to the cost throughout from the fourth defendant. CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (Central Act No. 9 of 1872) - Chapter X: Sections 186, 187, 188 & 222 - Liability under … against the principal which flows from the relationship of principal and agent, to seek reimbursement from the principal. Section 222 of the Contract Act embodies the aforesaid principle inasmuch as it specifically states that the 'employer of an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial