Advanced Search Results
Lajya Ram Vs. Jalil-ur Rehman and ors.
Delhi
Feb-01-1967
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 219
3(1967)DLT672
agree. The case questioned as to when the remuneration of agent was due under Section 219 of the Contract Act, 1872 - There was a presumption that subject to contract to the contrary became payable only after the performance
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaja Ram Jaiswal Vs. Ganesh Prasad and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-19-1957
PropertyContract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 43, 182, 219, 230 and 235; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 2; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 252; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91
AIR1959All29
costs. (i) Contract - capacity and liability of director - Sections 43, 182, 219, 230 and 235 of Contract Act, 1872 and Section 252 of Companies Act, 1956 - director of company is not necessarily his agent - director
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKotharaju Narayana Rao Vs. Tekumalla Ramachandra Rao
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-19-1958
Contract
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4, 5 and 118; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 23 and 219; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 8
AIR1959AP370
- Sections 4, 5 and 118 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Sections 10, 23 and 219 of Contract Act, 1872 - defendant agreed to sell his land to company - sale price was in excess of market value … all conditions imposed by the contract must have been fulfilled.'These principles govern the truth of the consideration here. Section 219 of the Indian Contract Act merely lays down that 'in the absence of any special contract, payment for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S. Industrial Credit and Development Syndicate Now Called I.C.D.S. L ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-10-1999
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Crpc), 1908 - Sections 28, 34, 37 and 53 - Order 21, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 219, Rule 1; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 59, 60 and 61;
AIR1999SC1036; 1999(2)ALLMR(SC)434; [1999]96CompCas1(SC); JT1999(1)SC430; (1999)IIMLJ114(SC); 1999(1)SCALE393; (1999)3SCC80; [1999]1SCR555
to make payment - Sections 28, 34, and 53 and Order 21 Rules 1 and 2 and Order 219 Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 and Sections 59, 60 and 61 of Contract Act, 1872 - whether judgment … judgment debtors have sought refuge under the cloak of alleged protection provided , by Section 60 of the Contract Act, 1872. It is further submitted that in view of the later judgments of this Court in Mathunni Mathai v.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Stellar Information Technology Private Ltd Vs. Rakesh Kumar and O ...
Delhi
Aug-29-2016
Right to Information
view of the aforesaid, the application is dismissed and the interim order passed on 08.06.2016 is vacated. Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 27 Ad interim Injunction Plaintiff prayed to pass ex-parte ad interim injunction Order thereby restraining Defendant, from using
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gondal Vs. Govindram Seksaria
Mumbai
Nov-08-1943
PropertyContract
(1944)46BOMLR822
having regard to Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to which I will presently refer.12. The whole of the purchase price being paid, plaintiff No. 1 was … the City of Bombay Municipal Act, 1888, in that group of sections commencing with Section 139 ending with Section 219. The plaintiff-company would have had to establish, in the first instance, that under Section 146 the trustees were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoshanlal S. JaIn and ors. (Aop) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ...
Gujarat
Sep-23-2008
Direct Taxation
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 300; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 20(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 4, 139, 140A, 142, 143, 144, 190, 207, 208 to 219, 234A, 234B and 234C; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 59 to 61
(2008)220CTR(Guj)38; [2009]309ITR174(Guj); [2009]176TAXMAN95(Guj)
Constitution.7.5 An incidental contention was also raised based on provisions of Sections 59 - 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 to submit that the respondent authority had erred in law in not treating the amount of tax paid … during any financial year in accordance with provisions of Sections 208 - 219 in respect of total income of the assessee which would be chargeable … three assessment years under consideration as bad in law to the extent there is an overcharging of interest;(ii) Section 234A of the IT Act, 1961 (the Act) is ultra vires to the extent the said section provides
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamarbai and ors. Vs. Badrinarayan and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-27-1976
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 23; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 27(2), 28, 31 and 34; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 84; Criminal Law
AIR1977Bom228; (1976)78BOMLR579; 1977MhLJ115
the sale-deed is for an unlawful object or consideration within the meaning of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the sale would be void.79. The effect of these sections on transfers tainted by sexual immorality was considered … binding if made under seal, unenforceable if by parol.' 76. In P.S. Atiyah's Law of Contract, at page 219, we find the following observations:--'It must not be thought that illegality in the law of contract is conterminous
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.R. Herman and Mohatta (India) Ltd. Vs. Pran Ballav Majumdar
Kolkata
Feb-29-1960
Contract
Sale of Goods Act - Sections 31 and 35; ;Contract Act - Sections 73 and 74
AIR1960Cal524,64CWN798
shows that it draws its descent from its old and forgotten parent in Section 93 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which read as follows -'In the absence of any special promise the seller of goods is not bound … for payment on arrival of the ship. That isillustrated by Fragano v. Long, (1825) 4 B and C 219. In spite of the express stipulation that three months' credit was to be given from the time of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaipur Development Authority and ors. Vs. Chokhamal Contractors and or ...
Supreme Court of India
May-04-1989
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 16(1)(c); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 28; Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 119
AIR1990SC1426; 1989(1)ArbLR430; JT1989(2)SC285; 1989(1)SCALE1279; 1989(2)SCC721; 1989(3)SCR144
under a contract have to be settled by courts established by the State. Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides that every agreement by which any party thereto is restricted absolutely from enforcing his rights under or … (vide University of New South Wales v. Max Cooper & Sons Pty. Ltd. (35 Austriralian Law Reports, p. 219))7. An instructive survey of the Indian Law of Arbitration is to be found in the learned lecture delivered
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »