Advanced Search Results

Kaluram Bholaram Vs. Chimniram Motilal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1934Bom86; (1934)36BOMLR68; 150Ind.Cas.467

to principal-Measure of damages-Civil Procedure Code (Act V of 1908), Section 34-Compound interest.;Under Section 216 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, where an agent employed to purchase goods sells his own goods to his principal, that is to say,

Jaiswal Coal Co. Vs. Fatehganj Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 89, 90, 91, and 92; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 75 - Order 26, Rules 11, 12 and 18; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 216 and 217

Reported in : AIR1975Cal303

Law and the Indian Law. (As to Indian Law see Sections 211, 213 and 216 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872) 65. But can the Court issue commission and ask the Commissioner or Special Referee to enquire into secret … for it. An agent is bound to conduct the business of his agency with skill and diligence. Under Section 216 of the Contract Act if an agent, without the knowledge of his principal, deals in the business of

Bishal Chand JaIn Vs. Chattur Sen and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionContract

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 216, 217, 219 and 223; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73, 128 and 134

Reported in : AIR1967All506; (1968)IILLJ708All

on fresh appointment - held, Court properly constituted. (ii) Contract - breach of contract - Section 73 of Contract Act, 1872 - act of bank employee contrary to special instruction - resultant loss to bank - lower Court held … Chief Justice, is also not acceptable to us. The learned counsel for the appellant has referred to Article 216 of the Constitution which is in the following terms:'216. Constitution of High Courts ;--Every High Court shall consist

Damodar Das Vs. Sheoram Das and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1907)ILR29All730

is dismissed. The parties will have their proportionate costs in all Courts. Act No. IX of 1872 (Indian Contract Act), Sections 198, 211 and 216 - Principal and agent--Ratification--Suit for adjustment of accounts--Two appellate decrees in similar terms--Appeal … agent is not entitled to make a secret profit by dealing in the agency on his own account. Section 216 of Act No. IX of 1872 expressly provides that where an agent without the knowledge of his principal

Sh. Sudesh Kakkar vs.sh. Satish Mittal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

an agreement to sell then that act of forfeiture is one falling under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and that Section 74 of the Contract Act would only apply if the contract is of such a

Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta Vs. General Trading Corporation ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 74E and 80; ;Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Section 142; ;Limitation Act - Section 15(2); ;Sale of Goods Act - Section 23; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 103 and 178; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 137; ;Bills of Lading Act, 1856; ;English Bills of Lading Act, 1855

Reported in : AIR1964Cal290,68CWN410

toe receipt was an instrument of title to goods within the meaning of Section 103 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The appellants in that case were a firm of commission agents who had been instructed by one Chhaganlal … Halsbury 3rd Edition, Volume 35, Article 498 page 348, Scrutton on Charter Parties, 15th Edition, Article 757 page 216, (1808) 1 Camp 369, (1803) 4 E 211. Referring to the finding, in Lickbarrow v. Mason (1794) 5

Mr.Jigar Mahendra Sheth, vs Sucram Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd.,

Court : Chennai

the Limitation Act, 1963 (the Limitation Act) and a promise to pay under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (the Contract Act). If the aknowledgement is made beyond the period of limitation, learned counsel submits that the

Henderson Bridge Co. Vs. Henderson City

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the company, and that, under an ordinance of the city, accepted by the company, the city acquired a contract right to tax the bridge to low water mark on the Indiana shore, it being within the city … under an Act of the General Assembly of Kentucky approved February 9, 1872, the bridge company was incorporated and authorized to build a bridge across … ; De Saussure v. Gaillard, 127 U. S. 216 , 127 U. S. 234 ; Hale v. … case is stated in the opinion. MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an action, brought in the Henderson Circuit Court of Kentucky by the City of Henderson, Kentucky, against Page 141 U. … water mark on the Indiana shore, the provision of that ordinance in section 4 being as follows: "SEC. 4. That nothing herein shall be construed

Navinchandra Jethabhai and anr. Vs. Moolchand Sadaram Gindodiya

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 216; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 10, 16 and 18; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 106 and 115

Reported in : AIR1966Bom111; (1965)67BOMLR357; ILR1965Bom641

dispute, terminate the contract and sue for damages for breach of the contract. Section 3 of the India Contract Act enables the plaintiff to terminate the contract or to continue it by this acquiescence. In the present case

Bhabagrahi Nayak Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 217

Reported in : 84(1997)CLT388; 1997(I)OLR198

State Financial Corporation and the loanee is a pure and simple contract governed by the provisions of the Contract Act, 1872 read with the provisions in the Act, 1951 and its Rules. On the other hand, a confiscation proceeding … hand, the said observation had been made to obviate the question of ade novo trial, as envisaged in Section 216(4) of the Code. The provisions of Section 216 (3) and (4) as well as the provisions of Section