Advanced Search Results

Ranganayakamma Vs. K.S. Prakash

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Karnataka Court-fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1958 - Sections 35 and 35(2); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 25(1), 25(3) and 215; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 85 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rules 2, 4 and 17 - Order 33, Rule 41

Reported in : AIR2005Kant426; 2006(3)KarLJ177

for the 2nd appellant contends that the document Exhibit D-6 is void, hit by Section 25 of the Contract Act, 1872, for short Contract Act, since the consideration of Re. 1/- to each of the daughters (sisters) for release … perverse or suffers from any legal infirmity.83. Sri Narayan, learned Counsel for the 1st appellant points out to Section 215 of the Contract Act to contend that the power of attorney EX. D.8 executed by the 2nd plaintiff,

Durga Prasad Agarwalla and Another Vs. Sri Binoyendranath Banerjee (De ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Education

the Power of Attorney Act as well as Sections 182, 186, 226, 231 and 233 of the Indian Contract Act in support of his contention that contract executed by an agent can be enforced by other contracting party … Chandreshwar Singh and others vs. Ramchandra Singh and others: AIR 1973 Patna 215, if the signature of one of the executants of a document is … to execute any agreement or sale deed and to take all necessary steps to get such documents registered. Section 2 of the Power of Attorney Act makes it clear that donee of a power 12 of attorney

Pingle Venkat Rama Reddy Vs. Padampat Singhania

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 33 and 105C; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 214 and 215; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40 - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1950Bom76

- registration of shares - Sections 33 and 105C of Companies Act, 1913, Sections 214 and 215 of Contract Act, 1872 and Order 40 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - appellant (director of company) transferred shares … are when there is a new issue of shares is to be determined by a true interpretation of Section 105-C, Companies Act. This is a new section which has been introduced into our Act, and there is

M/s. Stellar Information Technology Private Ltd Vs. Rakesh Kumar and O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

view of the aforesaid, the application is dismissed and the interim order passed on 08.06.2016 is vacated. Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 27 Ad interim Injunction Plaintiff prayed to pass ex-parte ad interim injunction Order thereby restraining Defendant, from using … (i) The decision of the Madras High Court in Lister Technologies Private Limited v Mukundhan Dakshinamurthi and Ors.: 215(5) CTC 830. (ii) The decision of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Ambiance India Pvt. Ltd. V.

Penchalapati Anakampali Hanumantha Reddy and ors. Vs. P. Sanjeeva Redd ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Contract Act, 1872; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96(3), 148 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 9 - Order 23 Rules 1, 3 and 3A - Order 43, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 215

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD539; 2008(2)ALT109

Explanation to proviso of Rule 3 Order XXIII CPC compromise which is void, or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, shall not be deemed to be lawful, the order passed in AS No. 2594/2003 is liable to be … while concluding that High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 215 of the Constitution of India has the power to undo a decision … v. R. Rambilas AIR 2003 A.P. 32. Whereas appellants in the main appeal filed ASMP No. 1000/2006 under Section 148 r/w 151 CPC for enlarging the time to comply with the terms of the compromise decree passed

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. Hongo India (P) Ltd. an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35, 35(1), 35B, 35B(5), 35C, 35C(1), 35EE, 35EE(1), 35EE(2), 35G, 35G(2), 35H and 35H(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29, 29(2) and 29(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 25; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16 and 30; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 26 and 54; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 110 - Orders 21 and 45; Constitution of India - Articles 214 and 215; ;

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(SC)225; 2009(236)ELT417(SC); [2009]315ITR449(SC); JT2009(7)SC83; 2009(4)SCALE374; [2009]21STT90; 2009(3)LC1555(SC); (2009)24VST298(SC); 2009(5)SCC791;

the application within such period.29. Savings.- (1) Nothing in this Act shall affect Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872).(2) Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period … have all the powers including the power to punish for contempt of itself. Though we have adverted to Section 215 in the earlier part of our order, it is better to extract Sub-section (1) which is relevant and

Food Corporation of India and ors. Vs. Vikas Majdoor Kamdar Sahkari Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC495(SC); 2008BusLR16(SC); 2007(2)CTLJ249(SC); JT2007(12)SC517; (2008)2MLJ857(SC); 2007(13)SCALE126

of the contract. Finally, it is submitted that principles of quantum meruit under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (in short the 'Contract Act') has no application in view of the specific contractual provisions. Alternatively, it was … the rate of 18% per annum from the due date. Towards stevedoring charges the respondents herein claimed Rs. 215/- per MT instead of agreed rate of Rs. 108/- per MT. A sum of Rs. 51,20,263.70 was claimed

Kamarbai and ors. Vs. Badrinarayan and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 23; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 27(2), 28, 31 and 34; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 84; Criminal Law

Reported in : AIR1977Bom228; (1976)78BOMLR579; 1977MhLJ115

the sale-deed is for an unlawful object or consideration within the meaning of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the sale would be void.79. The effect of these sections on transfers tainted by sexual immorality was considered … Patkar J. gave the following reasons for hisconclusions at page 355 (of Bom LR) t (at pp. 214, 215 of AIR):'Past cohabitation would foe consideration for an agreement under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act but

N. Joachimson and Co. Vs. Meghji Valji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 3Ind.Cas.801

Agent dealing on his own account--Principal's rights and liabilities--Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 215, 216, 236. - - But the circumstances under which that … is argued that upon the facts found the respondent can claim according to Section 216 of the Indian Contract Act no more than that the appellants should, as agents, account for the profits they may have made from … one of whom falsely professed as agent of a third party to deal with the other. It is Section 215 of the Act which has a bearing on the case. It provides that-If an agent deals on his

Brojendro Kissore Roy Chowdhury Vs. the Hindusthan Co-operative Insura ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : 39Ind.Cas.705

not disputed that, in its interpretation, regard must be had to the terms of Section 126 of the Contract Act of 1872.6. The learned Counsel for the respondent admitted that a demand upon the surety was not necessary … recent case of Dwarkadoss v. Chivokala Krishnaiya 9 Ind. Cas. 204 ; 21 M.L.J. 457 ; 9 M.L.T. 215 ; (1911) 1 M.W.N. 41 is an authority Tor the proposition that Article 65 governs a suit of