Advanced Search Results
Chaubey Sushil Chandra Vs. Raj Bahadur
Allahabad
Sep-20-1976
Limitation
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 213; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 85; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 34
AIR1977All259
was placed on Narandas Morardas Gajiwala v. S. P. A. M. Papamal : AIR1967SC333 . While dealing with Section 213 of the Indian Contract Act the Supreme Court held:'The principal's right to sue an agent for rendition of … held:'There is no provision for a suit for accounts by the agent against his principal either in the Contract Act or in the Limitation Act. Therefore, normally such a suit will not lie. But the existence of special
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.G. Sarma and Co. Firm and ors. Vs. Friends and Co. and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-30-1959
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 213; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 2
AIR1960AP13
put in for therespondents, I make no order as to costs. Contract - agent - Section 213 of Contract Act, 1872 and Order 7 Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - suit by agent for rendition of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Tamil Nadu Vs. S. Alagirisubramanian Chettiar
Chennai
Dec-02-1987
ContractLimitation
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 213; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2(3)
AIR1988Mad248
will be however no order as to costs. 12. Appeal allowed. .Limitation - maintainability - Section 213 of Contract Act, 1872, Article 113 Schedule to Limitation Act, 1963 and Order 11 Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S. Imam Peer Khadri Nooredaria Vs. S. Khadija Bi and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-21-1963
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rule 6; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 213
AIR1965AP18
counter claim - Order 8 Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 213 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 - plaintiff filed suit for an account on basis of contract of agency - defendant made counter claim
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamakrishna Agencies (Private) Ltd. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation, Ma ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-24-1965
InsuranceContract
Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 36; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 213
AIR1967AP109; [1967]37CompCas94(AP)
(i) Insurance - commission - Section 36 of Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 and Section 213 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 - whether plaintiff entitled to commission on life insurance proposals submitted prior to appointed day - Section 36
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Sia Dulari and ors. Vs. Smt. Bhagwati and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-22-1972
Commercial
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 213
AIR1973All260
light of the observations made above. Costs will abide the result. Contract - liability - Section 213 of Contract Act, 1872 - a suit by the principal against deceased agent's legal representative for rendition of accounts and for recovery
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Raja Kakarlapudi Venkata Sudarsana Sundara Narasayyamma Garu (Died ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-17-1959
PropertyContract
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58 and 137; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172, 176 and 177; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211 and 213; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42
AIR1960AP273
interpretation - Sections 58 and 137 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Sections 172 and 176 of Contract Act, 1872 - delivery of blank share transfer form along with instrument of security - whether mortgage or pledge - … the will had been executed at Madras, it is necessary to obtain the probate before filing the suit. Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act inter alia provides as follows :Section 213(1) :'No right as executor or legatee
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Vs. Simhadripuram Co-operat ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-11-2004
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 213; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 33; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65
2004(4)ALD220; 2004(4)ALT587; 2004(3)ARBLR34(AP)
There shall be no order as to costs throughout. Contract - misappropriation - Sections 74 and 213 of Contract Act, 1872, Order 41 Rule 33 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1940 and Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModi Nathubhai Motilal and ors. Vs. Chhotubhai Manibhai Desai
Gujarat
Jul-27-1961
FamilyProperty
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 5, 33, 60, 165 and 213; Hindu Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 6 and 14
AIR1962Guj68; (1962)0GLR418
the appeal is dismissed with costs. Family - partition - Sections 5, 33, 60, 165 and 213 of Contract Act, 1872, Hindu Law and Sections 4, 6 and 14 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - respondent filed suit for … must be deemed to have b en abrogated by the Hindu Succession Act of 1956. in particular, by Sections 4 and 6 because under the new Law of Succession, the daughter also gets a share in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhila Dhish and ors. Vs. Mool Chand and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-21-1969
Family
Limitation Act - Article 89
(1969)3SCC411
observations, we dismiss this appeal with costs. - [ A.N. Grover,; J.C. Shah and; V. Ramaswami, JJ.] -- Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), Section 201, read with Section 213-Termination of Agency - When arises - A question of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »