Advanced Search Results

State of Gondal Vs. Govindram Seksaria

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyContract

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR822

having regard to Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to which I will presently refer.12. The whole of the purchase price being paid, plaintiff No. 1 was … to Rs. 1,24,092. This letter stated that the property taxes were a first charge on the properties under Section 212 of the City of Bombay Municipal Act, 1888. As a result of that startling disclosure, a triangular correspondence

K.M. Abbu Chettiar Vs. Hyderabad State Bank

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 10 and 82; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 212

Reported in : AIR1954Mad1001; [1954]24CompCas221(Mad); (1954)IMLJ566

Rao. Banking - forgery - Sections 10 and 82 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Section 212 of Contract Act, 1872 - in case banker having paid cheque not drawn on banker at all plaintiff entitled to relief asked

Sinclair Freight and Chartering Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Fiel Traders

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 211, 212 and 214; ;Air Act, 1972

Reported in : AIR1987Cal201,1988(15)ECC207

of suit on ground of consignor having suffered on account of negligence of agent--Justified--Indian Contract Act (9 of 1872), Sections 211, 212, 214.--Carriage by Air Act (69 of 1972), Section 3(1); Schedule I, Rules 6(5), 8(k), (1), … that the air way-bill was not approved by the respondent. An agent is, under Section 211 of the Contract Act, bound to conduct the business of his principal according to directions given by the principal, or, in the

Framji Besanji Dustur Vs. Jaitha Devji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1878)ILR2Bom258

moveable property - Sheriff--Execution-creditor--Warranty---Title--Act VIII of 1859, Sections 212, 249, 252, 256 to 258--Indian Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 109. - - 5,792, with costs and interest, unsatisfied. 281 see 291 observed, the exceptions 'well nigh eat … considered to have a very precarious, or, at least, limited, existence. Under Act IX of 1872 (the Indian Contract Act), however, the application of the English legal maxim of caveat emptor to a sale of goods seems, so

Superintendent and Legal Remembrancer, State of West Bengal Vs. Corpor ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections Sections 115, 167(2), 218, 218(1), 512, 537, 541, 541(1), 541(2) and 547A; ;Constitution of India - Articles 25, 32, 136, 226, 298, 300, 372 and 544; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 385(1), 386(1), 421 and 488; Common Law; Constitutional Law; Interpretation Act; Crown Proceedings Act; City of Bombay Municipal Act, 1888 - Sections 212, 222(1), 265, 305, 489 and 491; Indian Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 26 - Schedule - Articles 167 and 178; City of Madras Municipal Act, 1884 - Sections 341; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 110, 208(1) and 225(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections - 74; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(2) and 90; Indian Easements Act - Sections 2; The Crown Grant

Reported in : AIR1967SC997; 1967CriLJ950; [1967]2SCR170

bound unless the contrary is stated. Many Acts like the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Indian Contract Act 1872 make special provisions for the Government in respect of particular matters on the assumption that in respect of … (No. 1)(7) that the Crown was subject to a charge under s. 212 of the Bombay City Municipal Act. A careful study of these decisions … for the year 1960-61, the Government of West Bengal did not take out a licence under the said section but carried on the said trade. The main contention of the Government was that the State was not

Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta Vs. General Trading Corporation ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 74E and 80; ;Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Section 142; ;Limitation Act - Section 15(2); ;Sale of Goods Act - Section 23; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 103 and 178; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 137; ;Bills of Lading Act, 1856; ;English Bills of Lading Act, 1855

Reported in : AIR1964Cal290,68CWN410

toe receipt was an instrument of title to goods within the meaning of Section 103 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The appellants in that case were a firm of commission agents who had been instructed by one Chhaganlal … well as the decision of Rao, J.99. In Bajranglal Agarwalla v. Dominion of India, ILR (1958) 2 Cal 212, G.K. Mitter, J. of this Court had to deal with the question as to who has a right

M/s Jade Garden Plot Owner's Association Vs. Smt. Bhagyalakshmi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

favour of Defendant No.2, which could be said to be coupled with interest under Section 202 of the Contract Act, 1872, thereby making the sale deed of the year 1995 valid?. ........................................ 62 H. Whether a suit for partition … vitality to adopt the contrary view mainly to defeat the ends of justice. 12 1916 SCC Oline Cal 212 - 71 - NC:2024. KHC:43493 CRP No.88 of 2024 12.13. Applying the said principle to the present case,

M/S Jade Garden Plot Owner'S Association vs Smt. Bhagyalakshmi

Court : Karnataka

favour of Defendant No.2, which could be said to be coupled with interest under Section 202 of the Contract Act, 1872, thereby making the sale deed of the year 1995 valid? ........................................ 62 H. Whether a suit for partition … its vitality to adopt the contrary view mainly to defeat the ends of justice. 1916 SCC Oline Cal 212 - 71 - 12.13. Applying the said principle to the present case, the Power of Attorney having been

S.M.Mariyam Aysha Umma Vs Ashok Kumar

Court : Chennai

the plaintiffs that the sale deed is void on the ground of fraud.35. Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 defines fraud, which is as follows:-“17. 'Fraud' defined.- 'Fraud' means and includes any of the following acts committed … Egmore, Chennai. The plaintiff took along with him the original documents relating to the property at Door no. 212, New No. 218, Linghi Chetty Street, Chennai and met the first defendant. The second plaintiff requested a loan

Karsandas Kalidas Ghia Vs. Chhotalal Motichand

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1924Bom119; (1923)25BOMLR1037

taken that no time for the performance was specified within the meaning of Section 46 of the Indian Contract Act: that is, the plaintiff's engagement bad to be performed within a reasonable time. A subsidiary question arises as … in Wet End Watch Company v. Berna Watch Company I.L.R. (1910) 35 Bom. 425 : 13 Bom. L.R. 212. The point is not therefore discussed as a particular issue in the lower Court's judgment. However at p.