Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 210 · Page 1 of about 181 results (0.060 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 16 1907

Poma Dongra Vs. William Gillespie

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-16-1907

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR143

plaintiffs were in a position to dominate his will.;(1) That reading Sub-section 16 and 19A of the Indian Contract Act 1872 together the Court had the power to interfere and relieve a defendant against what might appear to the … of the plaintiffs by instalment and applied to pay by instalments I would have considered the application. Under Section 210 of the Civil Procedure Code this Court has the power to make its money decrees payable by instalment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2007

K.R. Steelunion Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Ac ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-05-2007

Subject : CompanyTenancy

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446; Presidency Small Causes Court Act, 1882 - Sections 41; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1), 13(1), 13(2) and 28; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1) and 33; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Companies Act - Sections 210, 211, 446, 455 and 458; Super Profits Tax Act, 1963; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 117, 298 and 299

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR821; 2007(4)MhLj280; [2007]76SCL108(Bom)

licensees or tenants are not governed by Rent Act but they are subjected to the provisions of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and/or the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 or by other Laws other than Rent Law. 17. Learned Counsel … post facto leave can be granted. 25. Mr. Thakkar further submits that in view of the provisions of Section 210 and 211 of the Companies Act read with Rule 298 and 299 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 1959

Pamulapati Bhushayya Vs. Kommareddy Chinnapareddi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-13-1959

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Central Excies Rules, 1944 - Rules 175(2), 178(4) and 210

Reported in : AIR1960AP39

view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Civil - illegal partnership - Section 23 of Contract Act, 1872, Section 6 of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and Rules 175 (2), 178 (4) and 210 of Central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 05 2007

Erach Boman Khavar Vs. Tukaram Sridhar Bhat

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-05-2007

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 69, 69(3), 210, 211, 446, 455 and 458; Presidency Small Causes Court Act, 1882 - Sections 41; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1937 - Sections 13(1), 13(2) and 28; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1) and 33; Contract Act, 1872; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Super Profits Tax Act, 1963; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 117, 298 and 299

Reported in : (2008)1CompLJ111(Bom); [2008]81SCL416(Bom)

or tenants are not governed by Rent Act but they are subjected to the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and/or the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, or by other laws other than Rent Law.Learned Counsel further submits … granted.Mr. Thakkar further submits that in view of the provisions of Sections 210 and 211 of the Companies Act, read with Rules 298 and 299 … V.C. Daga, J.1. The applicant has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Companies Act' for short), to seek leave to file and proceed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2015

The Inspector General of Registration, Pattinapakkam, Chennai and Anot ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-30-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

section 35(1)(c), section 35(3)(c), Section 69(2), Section 68(2) €“ General Clauses Act, 1894 - Section 23 - Indian Contract Act, 1872 -Section 201, Section 202, Section 209, Section 203 to Section 210, Section 203, Section 204, Section 205, Section 206

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2007

Federal Bank Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2007

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 5; Kerala Finance Act, 1998; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210(3); Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 176; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 6(1), 8 and 29; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2

Reported in : [2007]137CompCas44(SC); 2007(2)CTC848; JT2007(5)SC91; 2007(3)KLT106(SC); 2007(4)SCALE613; (2007)4SCC188; (2007)6VST736(SC); 2007AIRSCW2411

the borrower. In the present case, we are not concerned with the provisions of Section 176 of the Contract Act, 1872. We are concerned with the definition of the word 'sale' under the 1963 Act. When a bank sells … the case may be, of a banking company.(3-A) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Sub-section (3) of Section 210 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), the period to which the profit and loss account relates

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Board of Trustees of Chennai Port Trust Rep. by its Chairman Rajaji Sa ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-30-2016

Subject : Arbitration

been altered by deletion and addition of certain work items and it falls under Section 62 of the Contract Act, 1872. The deleted work items as per variation order are (i) Mobilisation of equipment and vessels required for compaction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1970

R.R.N. Ramalinga Nadar Vs. V. Narayana Reddiar

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-10-1970

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 1 and 2; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(23)

Reported in : AIR1971Ker197

States in the continent.The extent of liability of a bailee under Sections 151 and 152 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is different from the extent of liability of a common carrier. A bailee is only bound to take … reward for so doing.'In Belfast Rope work Co. v. Bushell. 1918-1 KB 210, Bailhache J. said:'...to make a man a common carrier he must carry … necessary for the purposes of his business, not being a business of Providing transport, is a private carrier. Section 2(23) defines a 'public carrier as under:'2 (23) 'Public carrier, means an owner of a transport vehicle who

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 1985

Cheran Engineering Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Oct-30-1985

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1986)LC465Tri(Chennai)

the words 'fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement and wilful contravention'. "Fraud" as defined in Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, brings in intent to deceive. There is always an element of intention in collusion. Wilful mis-statement again involves … with Section 11A of the Act and why a penalty should not be imposed under Rules 9(2), 52A, 210 and 1'73Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Eventually the Collector dropped the question of imposition of penalty

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2009

Md. Ibrahim and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-04-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 25, 206, 207, 208, 210, 239, 240, 242, 243, 246 to 253, 261, 264 to 266, 323, 341, 415 to 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 463 to 471, 496 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3) and 482

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR3087; JT2009(11)SC533; 2009(12)SCALE250; (2009)8SCC751; 2009(9)LC4349(SC); [2009] 13 SCR 1254

dictionary definition of `fraud' is 'deliberate deception, treachery or cheating intended to gain advantage'. Section 17 of the Contract Act, 1872 defines `fraud' with reference to a party to a contract. In Dr. Vimla v. Delhi Administration : AIR … Fraudulent claim to property to prevent seizure (Section 207).(iii) Fraudulent suffering or obtaining a decree (Section 208 and 210)(iv) Fraudulent possession/delivery of counterfeit coin (Section 239, 240, 242 and 243).(v) Fraudulent alteration/diminishing weight of coin (Section 246

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial