Advanced Search Results

The Inspector General of Registration, Pattinapakkam, Chennai and Anot ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

section 35(1)(c), section 35(3)(c), Section 69(2), Section 68(2) €“ General Clauses Act, 1894 - Section 23 - Indian Contract Act, 1872 -Section 201, Section 202, Section 209, Section 203 to Section 210, Section 203, Section 204, Section 205, Section 206

Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 3, 4, 10, 10(1), 10E, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 16, 32, 34, 36, 71, 88, 91B, 172(1), 173, 173(2), 176(3), 176(5), 189(2), 203, 204, 204(4), 205, 207, 208, 209(4), 277, 283(1), 294, 294(2), 294(2A), 294(5), 294A, 294A(1), 295(5), 299, 299(1), 299(4), 300, 300(1), 300(3), 300(4), 314, 314(1), 314(2), 314(3), 397 and 398; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1965

Reported in : [1971]41CompCas377(Bom); [1971]41ITR377(Bom)

merely an agent of a shareholder to vote at a particular meeting. Under section 203 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, except where an agent has an interest in the subject-matter of the agency, the principal may revoke the … required inspection in his capacity as director, were those of which he was entitled to inspection under section 209(4)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. Nonetheless inspection was denied to him. It was said at the hearing that

Rani Sundar Koer Vs. Rai Sham Krishen

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR304

bonds were obtained from the mortgagor by undue influence within the meaning of Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as amended by Act VI of 1899, Section 2; (2) that a sum of Rs. 8,700 retained by … to inquire into the source of the power in the Court to allow such interest. The words of Section 209 of the Civil Procedure Code are largo enough to include the case of a sum of money payable

Standard Chartered Bank Vs. Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd. and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilCompany

Acts : Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 3(3), 5, 10 and 13; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(12), 108, 108(1), 111, 111(1), 111(2), 111(7), 155, 620, 620(1) and 620(2); Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 9, 130 to 136 and 137; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35, 110, 114 and 165; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 3(3) and 4(2); Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 27; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 - Order 12, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2006SC3626; 2006(5)SCALE384; (2006)6SCC94; [2006]68SCL109(SC); MANU/SC/2534/2006

inference is a presumption which the court is entitled to draw under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 read with illustration (g) thereto. Mr. Jethmanlani contended that the weight of the authorities would show that unless … this connection Chow Yoong Hong v. Choong Fah Rubber Manufactory (1962) AC 209 It was nobody's case that in any of the transactions under the … opposed to public policy, the Special Court had made the following findings:The object and consideration of the suit contracts are purchase/sale of the securities and payment of price. Such securities contracts are normally entered into by banks.

Dr. Anil K. Khandelwal and 14 ors. Vs. Shri Maksud Saiyed and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 195, 197, 199, 340 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107, 120A, 120B, 175, 177, 181, 191, 196, 199, 192, 200, 209, 405, 409, 415, 420, 425, 463, 464, 468, 470, 471, 499 and 500; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 - Sections 3(2B); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(2) and 13(4); RDB Act, 1993; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 63 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Documentary Credit Rules; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) (Amendment) Act, 20003; Criminal Law

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3180; (2006)3GLR2043

and the accused persons, it also amounts to fraud of the Bank under Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. He has, therefore, submitted that the criminal complaint has been lodged by the complainant and the investigation is … filing the said so called original application in violation of the natural justice for making false claim under Section 209 by giving false and fabricated statements, information and evidences under Sections 177, 181, 191, 192, 196, 199, 200,

Kamarbai and ors. Vs. Badrinarayan and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 23; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 27(2), 28, 31 and 34; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 84; Criminal Law

Reported in : AIR1977Bom228; (1976)78BOMLR579; 1977MhLJ115

the sale-deed is for an unlawful object or consideration within the meaning of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the sale would be void.79. The effect of these sections on transfers tainted by sexual immorality was considered … Division Bench of this Court in Sabava Yellappa v. Yamanappa Sabu 35 Bom LR 345: AIR 1933 Bom 209, lays down that a suit for the recovery of possession of property transferred under a sale deed, the

Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Ltd. Vs. Jignesh Shah and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the Defendants are entitled to raise defences based upon the Contract Act, 1872. He submitted that in the present case, the Plaintiffs have refused to perform their part of the contract … this contention, Mr. Kapadia has relied on the decision in VipinBhimani vs. Smt. Sundara Das (AIR 2006 Cal. 209)and the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in M/s. Shah and Jhaveri Developers vs. M/s.

Castron Technologies Limited and Vs. Castron Mining Limited

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

the act agreed to be done and, hence, comes within the purview of Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. However, the provisions of the said Section cannot apply to a case of "self-inducted frustration". In other words, … HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original SidePresent:The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee. C.A. No. 209 of 2006 C.A. No. 667 of 2006 C.A. No. 96 of 2007 C.A. No. 689 of 2009 C.P.

New Orleans Vs. Warner

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

intention of the amendment of 1874 to the Constitution of Louisiana, limiting the power of New Orleans to contract debts thereafter, to validate the issues of drainage warrants, some of which are questioned in this suit, not … for property which Van Norden bought from the Ship Canal Company in 1872 six times as much as he then paid for it is one … 259. In McLean County v. Bloomington, 106 Ill. 209, it was also claimed that public property, being … delivery, are not included within the terms of Article 3540 of the Civil Code of Louisiana, prescribing certain actions therein named, and are not prescribed by the statutes of that state. The City of New Orleans, having … property of the state, counties, and other municipal corporations from the former, section 3 makes no provision in regard to the latter, but, on the

Mahomed Mehdi HosseIn Khan and ors. Vs. Rameswar Koer and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyContract

Reported in : (1899)ILR26Cal39

interest.4. The Gaya bond is dated 26th March 1881 and is made payable six months later. The Indian Contract Act, 1872, follows the ordinary rules of law in providing that when the debtor has omitted to intimate, and when … humbly advise Her Majesty to dismiss it, and the appellants must pay the costs. Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 60 - Creditor's appropriation of payments to one or other of debts--Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), … date of suit from 4 to 12 percent. The Subordinate Judge evidently considered that the case fell within Section 209 of the Civil Procedure Code, which gives a discretion to the Court in such matters. The High Court