Advanced Search Results

J.K. Sayani Vs. Bright Brothers Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 205 and 206; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1980Mad162; (1980)1MLJ130

to the extent indicated above. No costs.12. Appeal allowed. Contract - compensation - Sections 205 and 206 of Contract Act, 1872 and Article 226 of Constitution of India - Order of Judge challenged - by impugned Order Section 206

The Inspector General of Registration, Pattinapakkam, Chennai and Anot ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

section 35(1)(c), section 35(3)(c), Section 69(2), Section 68(2) €“ General Clauses Act, 1894 - Section 23 - Indian Contract Act, 1872 -Section 201, Section 202, Section 209, Section 203 to Section 210, Section 203, Section 204, Section 205, Section 206

international Oil Co., by Its Proprietor, Selvaraj, Madras Vs. Indian ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 201 and 206

Reported in : AIR1969Mad423; (1969)1MLJ605

the plaintiff'sclaim will stand decreed as prayed for.Leave granted. Contract - termination - Sections 201 and 206 of Contract Act, 1872 - whether Indian Oil Corporation (respondent) can terminate agency with plaintiff without any notice - respondent had reserved … appeal isallowed with costs, and the plaintiff'sclaim will stand decreed as prayed for.Leave granted. Contract - termination - Sections 201 and 206 of Contract Act, 1872 - whether Indian Oil Corporation (respondent) can terminate agency with plaintiff

Md. Ibrahim and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 25, 206, 207, 208, 210, 239, 240, 242, 243, 246 to 253, 261, 264 to 266, 323, 341, 415 to 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 463 to 471, 496 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3) and 482

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR3087; JT2009(11)SC533; 2009(12)SCALE250; (2009)8SCC751; 2009(9)LC4349(SC); [2009] 13 SCR 1254

dictionary definition of `fraud' is 'deliberate deception, treachery or cheating intended to gain advantage'. Section 17 of the Contract Act, 1872 defines `fraud' with reference to a party to a contract. In Dr. Vimla v. Delhi Administration : AIR … when done fraudulently (or fraudulently and dishonestly) are made offences. These include:(i) Fraudulent removal or concealment of property (Section 206, 421, 424)(ii) Fraudulent claim to property to prevent seizure (Section 207).(iii) Fraudulent suffering or obtaining a decree (Section

City Municipal Council Vs. C. Ramu

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 40; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Karnataka Civil Court Act, 1964

Reported in : ILR1989KAR2138

to operate against the defendant. As such the defendant cannot also be estopped from contending to the contra.;(C) CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (Central Act No. 9 of 1872) - Section 28 - Clause absolving contracting party from liability of any … the agreement. Code are not satisfied, it is not possible to hold that the decree passed in O. 206). The alleged title of Basavanagouda to the suit lands was not necessarily inconsistent with the possessory relief of

Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd vs.rentworks India Pvt. Ltd. & O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

is unable to immediately state.11. The counsel for the defendant no.1 refers to Section 20 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 to contend that the Closure Agreement dated 4th September, 2018 is void, since both the plaintiff as well

Bright Brothers (Private) Limited Vs. J.K. Sayani

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1976Mad55; (1975)2MLJ257

pleaded by the appellants herein. Finally he came to the conclusion that under Section 206 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the respondent was entitled to a reasonable notice, that that reasonable notice, having regard to the circumstances of

Sohrabji Dhunjibhoy Medora Vs. the Oriental Government Security Life A ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : InsuranceCivil

Reported in : AIR1944Bom166; (1944)46BOMLR279

defined toy Section 2(10) of the Act;;(4) That the plaintiffs were entitled, under Section 206 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to a reasonable notice of the revocation of their agency, which in this case was a period of

Smt.S.Savithramma vs Smt.S.Padmavathamma

Court : Karnataka

Powerof Attorney (GPA) by the Appellant (Plaintiff) was valid and legally effective under Section 208 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and whether proper notice of termination was given to the concerned parties, thereby affecting the validity of subsequent … of defendant No.5 (Nagarathnamma), the respondents assert that the appellant did not comply with the legal requirements under Section 206 of the Indian Contract Act. The appellant issued a notice of cancellation on October 11, 2002, but failed

GOPAMMA Vs Murugesan

Court : Chennai

of attorney dated 21.02.2008 is fatal under Section 206 of Indian Contract Act. Section 206 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, requires that reasonable notice must be given when an agency is revoked or renounced. If this notice is