Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 205 · Page 1 of about 203 results (0.062 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 1979

J.K. Sayani Vs. Bright Brothers Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-26-1979

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 205 and 206; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1980Mad162; (1980)1MLJ130

to the extent indicated above. No costs.12. Appeal allowed. Contract - compensation - Sections 205 and 206 of Contract Act, 1872 and Article 226 of Constitution of India - Order of Judge challenged - by impugned Order Section 206

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2008

Smt. Nirmalabai D. Kale and ors. Vs. Shri Madan S/O Shri Balaji Ratan, ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2008

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 416 and 416(2); Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 6 - Schedule - Articles 7 and 23; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 201, 202, 203, 204 and 205; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 21, Rule 90 - Order 29, Rule 1

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR747; 2009(1)BomCR309

It speaks of plaintiff as an individual i.e. not in his official capacity. Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is applicable to cases where the agent himself has interest in the property which forms subject matter of … exercised so as to bind the principal. Section 204 contemplates revocation when authority has been partly exercised and Section 205 contemplates compensation for revocation by principal or renunciation by agent. No arguments are advanced touching these provisions &

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1986

Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited and anr. Vs. Brojo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-06-1986

Subject : Service

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19(1), 23, 32, 36, 37, 38, 38(1), 39, 40, 41, 42, 47, 51, 51-A, 53(1), 68, 73, 131, 141, 152, 154, 154(1), 162, 226, 298, 308, 311, 311(2), 366, 367(1), 370 and 372; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16(1), 16(2), 19, 19-A, 23 and 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 19\7; Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. (Service, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 - Rules 9 and 11; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1908 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1986SC1571; (1986)3CompLJ1(SC); 1986LabIC1312; (1986)IILLJ171SC; 1986(1)SCALE799; (1986)3SCC156; [1986]2SCR278; 1986(2)SLJ320(SC); [1986] 2 SCR 178; AIR 1986 SC 157; MANU/SC/0439/1986

2) Whether an unconscionable term in a contract of employment is void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as being opposed to public policy and, when such a term is contained in a contract of employment … that section it is stated at page 107: Like the obligation of good faith and fair dealing (S 205), the policy against unconscionable contracts or terms applies to a wide variety of types of conduct. The determination

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 30 2015

The Inspector General of Registration, Pattinapakkam, Chennai and Anot ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-30-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

section 35(1)(c), section 35(3)(c), Section 69(2), Section 68(2) €“ General Clauses Act, 1894 - Section 23 - Indian Contract Act, 1872 -Section 201, Section 202, Section 209, Section 203 to Section 210, Section 203, Section 204, Section 205, Section 206

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2009

H.B. Basavaraj (Dead) by Lrs. and anr. Vs. Canara Bank and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-28-2009

Subject : Contract

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950; Lokashikshana Trust (Taking Over of Management) Act - Sections 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56, 62, 70, 129 and 130; Evidence Act - Sections 115; Lokashikshana Trust (Taking over of management) Ordinance

Reported in : 2010(1)KarLJ588; 2009(13)SCALE474; 2009AIRSCW7567

the Bank would clearly show it to be one of a continuing guarantee. Section 129 of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') defines a continuing guarantee as 'A guarantee which extends to a series … final order dated 29th of September, 2000 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in R.F.A No. 205/1995 whereby, the High Court had dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants herein.2. The relevant facts, which would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1969

Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-07-1969

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 3, 4, 10, 10(1), 10E, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 16, 32, 34, 36, 71, 88, 91B, 172(1), 173, 173(2), 176(3), 176(5), 189(2), 203, 204, 204(4), 205, 207, 208, 209(4), 277, 283(1), 294, 294(2), 294(2A), 294(5), 294A, 294A(1), 295(5), 299, 299(1), 299(4), 300, 300(1), 300(3), 300(4), 314, 314(1), 314(2), 314(3), 397 and 398; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1965

Reported in : [1971]41CompCas377(Bom); [1971]41ITR377(Bom)

merely an agent of a shareholder to vote at a particular meeting. Under section 203 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, except where an agent has an interest in the subject-matter of the agency, the principal may revoke the … and godown and on building other than the portion used for business which aggregated to Rs. 87,827, under section 205 of the Companies Act, 1956. Further, on the assets side is shown a sum of Rs. 39,76,604 for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 2014

M/s. Flemingo (Duty Free Shop) Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. The Commissio ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

with defect of jurisdiction. 29. Savings (1) Nothing in this Act shall affect section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. (2) Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period of limitation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1998

The Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Limited, Bom ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-28-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 39(2),53, 113(2), 205, 207, 219(4) and 630; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 201, 245 and 482; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72; Constitution of India - Article 226;

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD(Cri)154; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)348; ILR2000KAR344; 1998(5)KarLJ693

1 in the negative and I proceed to pass the following order - INDIAN CONTRACT ACT (9 of 1872) Section 20: [Arali Nagaraj, J] Void agreement - Defendant, under belief that virtue of allotment order itself he had … be performed, the promisor can perform the promise in the manner so prescribed. (See Section 50 of the Contract Act) Once a mode of payment of dividend is agreed to, namely, by posting a cheque or a warrant, … posted to the registered address of the shareholder, dividend is deemed to have been paid within meaning of Section 205. The section makes the failure to post within the prescribed period and not the non-receipt of the warrant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2013

A.Chandrasekaran Vs. Yoha Securities Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-2013

Subject : MRTP

5.3. On a consideration of all aspects of the matter, we recommend that Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, should be suitably amended so as to render invalid contractual clauses which purport to extinguish, on the expiry … in accordance with substantive law of India.17. In Pandit Construction Company vs. Delhi Development Authority {2007 (3) Arb.L.R. 205}, the Delhi High Court was concerned with an award where a claim was rejected on the ground that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2006

Mmtc Limited Vs. Sineximco Pte Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-03-2006

Subject : Contract

Acts : Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 34(2); Contract Act - Sections 73 and 74

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR12(Delhi); 2006(90)DRJ638

advance was by way of liquidated damages and in view of provisions of Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the same would imply that the petitioner is entitled to recover reasonable compensation but subject to a ceiling … The two grades of Chrome were 50/48 per cent and 46/44 per cent at a price of USD 205 and USD 155 respectively per dry metric tone. 2. In pursuance of the contract, an advance of USD

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial