Advanced Search Results

Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 3, 4, 10, 10(1), 10E, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 16, 32, 34, 36, 71, 88, 91B, 172(1), 173, 173(2), 176(3), 176(5), 189(2), 203, 204, 204(4), 205, 207, 208, 209(4), 277, 283(1), 294, 294(2), 294(2A), 294(5), 294A, 294A(1), 295(5), 299, 299(1), 299(4), 300, 300(1), 300(3), 300(4), 314, 314(1), 314(2), 314(3), 397 and 398; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1965

Reported in : [1971]41CompCas377(Bom); [1971]41ITR377(Bom)

merely an agent of a shareholder to vote at a particular meeting. Under section 203 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, except where an agent has an interest in the subject-matter of the agency, the principal may revoke the

Smt. Nirmalabai D. Kale and ors. Vs. Shri Madan S/O Shri Balaji Ratan, ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 416 and 416(2); Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 6 - Schedule - Articles 7 and 23; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 201, 202, 203, 204 and 205; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 21, Rule 90 - Order 29, Rule 1

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR747; 2009(1)BomCR309

It speaks of plaintiff as an individual i.e. not in his official capacity. Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is applicable to cases where the agent himself has interest in the property which forms subject matter of … between the parties to prejudice such interest. Section 201 envisages termination of agency in all other cases and Section 203 permits Principal to revoke the authority given to his agent at any time before such authority has been

The Inspector General of Registration, Pattinapakkam, Chennai and Anot ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

section 35(1)(c), section 35(3)(c), Section 69(2), Section 68(2) €“ General Clauses Act, 1894 - Section 23 - Indian Contract Act, 1872 -Section 201, Section 202, Section 209, Section 203 to Section 210, Section 203, Section 204, Section 205, Section 206

Kishan Das Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 203; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT461

made, the case has to be decided keeping in view the provisions of Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 to compensate the supplier for the supply of coal to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. There is no … legal contract with the Municipal Corporation of Delhi there has to be a formal contract, as required by Section 203 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 read witht he rules and since in this case without execution

Raj Kumar Vs. Shri Chander Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 202, 203 and 204

Reported in : 2003(3)ARBLR609(P& H); (2003)135PLR445

rights assigned. Leaned counsel has referred to the provisions of Sections 202, 203 and 204 of the Indian Contract Act., 1872 and has also placed reliance on various judgments of this Court as well as of the Supreme Court … M.M. Kumar, J. 1. This petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is directed against the order dated 22.4.1995 passed by Sub

M/s. Stellar Information Technology Private Ltd Vs. Rakesh Kumar and O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

view of the aforesaid, the application is dismissed and the interim order passed on 08.06.2016 is vacated. Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 27 Ad interim Injunction Plaintiff prayed to pass ex-parte ad interim injunction Order thereby restraining Defendant, from using … Adebare and Others: 2006 (32) PTC 609 (Delhi) and Vogueserv International Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajesh Gosain and Ors.: 203 (2013) DLT 613, in support of its contention that the Defendants are liable to be restrained from approaching

K P Ramachandran S/O N Sankaran Nair vs Kalappa S/O Byrappa

Court : Karnataka

interest in praesenti.12. In this backdrop, the agency squarely fallswithin the ambit of Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which postulates that “where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of … of the agent. The provision constitutes a clear exception to the general rule embodied in Sections 201 and 203 of the Act relating to revocation of agency.13. In the present case, the covenants in theagreement and the

State Bank of Patiala Vs. Northland Sugar Complex Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529, 529A and 530; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 154; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 171; Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1985

Reported in : [2004]55SCL92(Punj& Har)

the applicant-Bank has relied upon the terms of the agreement as well as Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is in two parts. The first part is in the absence … with that of the liquidator, as was acknowledged in Karamelli and Barnett Ltd., In re [1917] 1 Ch. 203. We feel no difficulty in stating that in ease of such conflict, the interest of liquidator has to

M/S Silktex Limited vs State Bank of India

Court : Karnataka

to protect its own interest. I am unable to accept the said submission. Section 2 of the Indian Contract Act. 1872, being the interpretation clause of the Contract Act, is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:2. Interpretation-clause.-In this Act the

Delhi Tourism & Transportation vs.gammon India Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

before the prescribed period of limitation under the Limitation Act, is void as per Section 28 of the Contract Act, 1872, as amended. This issue being no longer res integra. OMP No.510/2015 Page 17 of 23 36. In Hindustan