Advanced Search Results

Ramchandra Lalbhai Vs. Chinubhai Lalbhai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR1075

No. 1 by defendant is revocable as it is not coupled with interest; Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.13. V.F. Taraporevala. Chinubhai Lalbhai & Bros., Ltd., was formed as a device to get capital and deposits for … to property is involved : Greenwell v. Porter [1902] 1 Ch. 530 Puddephatt v. Leith [1916] 1 Ch. 200 and Wise v. Lansdell [1921] 1 Ch. 420.12. The nomination (exhibit H) of plaintiff No. 1 by defendant

Elof Hansson (i) Pvt. Ltd. and anr Vs. Shree Acids and Chemicals Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

qua defendant No.2 is that it is the holding company of defendant No.1..5. Section 230 of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads as under:-.230. Agent cannot personally enforce, nor be bound by, contracts on behalf of principal.- In the … letter dated 15.1.1997, the defendant No.1 required the plaintiff company to amend the letter of Credit to cover 200 MT of mixed waste i.e. for US$ 15000 (Fifteen thousand only) as the goods had already been containerized.

Manohar S/O Rambhau Galghate Vs. Saraswati Co-operative Housing Societ ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesContract

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 91; Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 97; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 5 to 7 and 200; Urban Land Ceiling Act; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR711; 2005(5)BomCR470; 2005(3)MhLj297

was allotted to the petitioner. He further states that provisions of Sections 5 to 7 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 also show that there was no notice of revocation to the petitioner if said letter dated 27-3-1989 is … 125-B, there was no question of allotting said plot to anybody else. He also relies upon provision of Section 200 of Indian Contract Act to contend that the ratification of Secretary's act of execution of sale deed on

Kal Airways Private Limited Vs. Spicejet Limited and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

submissions of SEBI/BSE, issuance and allotment of warrants is impossible under law, therefore, Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 read with Clause 17.6 of the SPA is triggered and now it is to be decided at this … Ltd. and Ors." (hereinafter "Complaints") have been filed on 02.03.2015 by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter "Cr.PC") for alleged contravention under Sections 276B read with Sections

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. and an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72, 72(3), 73, 77, 77C, 77C(4), 78 and 78B; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 200; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 78B and 80; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 200; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Carriers Act, 1865; Explosive Rules; Tariff Rules

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD85

provisions of this Act, be that of a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (IX of 1872).(2) Omitted(3) Nothing in the common law of England or in the Carriers Act, 1865, regarding … had been canvassed in elaboration and the same had been dealt with in detail by the Trial Court. Section 200 of the Railways Act, 1989 (Act No. 24 of 1989) had repealed the Indian Railways Act, 1890. However,

Brojendro Kissore Roy Chowdhury Vs. the Hindusthan Co-operative Insura ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : 39Ind.Cas.705

not disputed that, in its interpretation, regard must be had to the terms of Section 126 of the Contract Act of 1872.6. The learned Counsel for the respondent admitted that a demand upon the surety was not necessary … the privity and knowledge of defendant No. 2 and at his request, paid to the plaintiff Corporation Rs. 200 on account of interest on the said note. Defendant No. 1 has not appeared, but defendant No. 2

Bhavani Shankar Joshi Vs. Gordhandas Jamnadas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR228

construed, and must in India be examined in the light of Sections 196 to 200 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which contain the general law of India upon the point. On these sections their Lordships hold that it … been certified or recorded by the Court under Rule 2 of that Order.-Eds.] Indian Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 196-200--Contract-Ratification-Assignment of decree by unauthorised agent purporting to act on principal's behalf- Whether principal can ratify such act-Civil

Chopra Hospital (P) Ltd. Through Its Directors and ors. Vs. Usha Chopr ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F and 397-398; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66 and 66(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 196 to 200; Evidence Act - Sections 111; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100, 101 and 102

Reported in : (2007)3CompLJ86(Del); [2007]79SCL299(Delhi)

had authorized Mr. Kamal Kapoor to file the petition. This was done. Sections 196 to 200 of the Contract Act, 1872 permit and allow retrospective authorisations. Moreover, the first question to the extent whether the respondent had executed the … Sanjiv Khanna, J.1. The present Appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, for short) has been filed by

United Breweries (Holdings) Limited and Another Vs. Bangalore Internat ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

14. He would also draw the attention of the Court to Sections 59, 60 and 61 of the Contract Act, 1872 to contend that Creditor - Kingfisher Airlines had not intimated the plaintiff that partial amount paid by it … Of The Suit As A Condition Precedent For Grant Of Leave To Defend. This Petition Is Filed Under Section 115 Of CPC, Against The Order Dated 30.03.2013 Passed In O.S.No. 8306/2012 On The File Of The Xxvii- … AIR 1990 SC 2218 Mrs.RAJ DUGGAL vs RAMESH KUMAR BANSAL (6) AIR 2004 BOMBAY 99 SMT.SHEEL ARORA vs SANJAY FETAH BAHADUR SRIVASTAVA 13. Per contra,

K. Ramachandra Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecuto ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 7, 9, 138, 139, 142 and 143 to 147; Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 183; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 5, 39, 142, 190, 190(1) 190(2) 192, 195 to 199, 200, 313 and 313(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60; Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002; General Clauses Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 202, 497 and 498

Reported in : 2005(2)ALT607; III(2005)BC111; 2005(2)CTC417; [2005(3)JCR390(AP)]

hearing before one of us (C.Y. Somayajulu, J.), since Powers of Attorney Act, 1882, and Section 183 of Contract Act, 1872, recognizing the principle QUI FACIT PER ALIUM FACIT PER SE were not considered while rendering the said decision, … file a complaint on their behalf cannot be resorted to. It is his contention that since as per Section 200 Cr.P.C. examination of the complainant in a private complaint is mandatory, and since 'complainant' does not mean the