Advanced Search Results
Manubhai Chhaganbhai Thakore Vs. Union Bank of India and 2 ors.
Gujarat
Apr-03-2007
Service
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19A, 20, 21 and 22; Constitution of India - Article 226
(2007)3GLR2629; (2008)IILLJ226Guj
appellant was not based on free consent. The word 'consent' is defined under Section 13 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short 'the Act') which says that two or more persons are said to consent when they agree … consent on the part of the appellant. As he was under undue influence, the appellant was entitled under Section 19A of the Indian Contract Act to have the agreement/contract set aside. Thus, his resignation was voidable at his
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskY.K. Sethi Vs. Basf India Limited and ors.
Delhi
Aug-11-2009
Service
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 14, 19, 19A and 23; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 58; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Service, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1979 - Rule 9(1)
(2010)ILLJ493Del
Clause 8 of the appointment letter dated 11th July 1997 is void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 3. After completion of pleadings, this Court by an order … that such a contract contained thereof by undue influence is also voidable in terms of Section 19 and 19A of the same Act. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff that with the plaintiff
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh B. Chokshi and Others Vs. Rahul Vasudeo Bhatt and Others
Mumbai
Oct-19-2012
MRTP
to a written promise to pay the said debt within the meaning of Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872? (ii) If it amounts to such a promise, does such a promise, by itself, create any legally enforceable … the Contract Act. Section 20 of the Contract Act incorporates a category of void agreements. Sections 19 and 19A provide for categories of agreements which are voidable. Section 23 provides that if the consideration or the object
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Centre Point Welfare Association Vs. Nita International
Gujarat
Mar-08-2001
ContractCommercial
Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act - Sections 10A, 159, 161, 253, 254, 254(1), 260, 260(1), 260(2), 263, 263(1) and 268; Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 5, 7, 7(2) and 11; Registration Act, 1908; Urban Development Act, 1976; Gujarat Town Planning and Development Act; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19A and 65; Bombay Land Revenue Code - Sections 4, 4(5) and 57; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 32 and 226;Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Rules - Rule 10; Assam Land and Revenue and Local Rates Regulation
(2001)4GLR2777
were shown. The learned counsel for the builder submitted that in view of section 19A of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, if there is undue influence, then, the agreement which is a contract, is voidable at the option of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSushil Singh a/O Uday Nath Singh Vs. Shree Parbhu NaraIn Yadav Son of ...
Allahabad
Dec-23-2005
Election
Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 - Sections 57, 58A, 80, 81, 82, 83, 86, 100(1), 100(2), 123, 123(1) to 123(8) and 135A; Goondas Act - Sections 3; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act - Sections 7; Arms Act - Sections 26 and 27; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rules 11 and 16 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 8, Rule 1 - Sections 151; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 341, 364, 504, 506 and 507
AIR2006All187
over the other capable of being unfairly used is known as undue influence. Under Section 19A of the Contract Act 1872, in order to prove undue influence the party alleging undue influence is bound to establish, any of two
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMhow Hosiery Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jitendra
Madhya Pradesh
May-11-2005
ServiceLabour and Industrial
Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1916 - Sections 31(3), 61, 62 and 86; Industrial Dispute Act; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16, 16(2), 13(3) and 19A; Constitution of India - Article 14
[2005(106)FLR889]; 2005(3)MPHT279
law the employment of service is a contract between employer and employee and the Section 19A of the Contract Act, 1872 gives power to set aside contract induced by undue influence which has been defined under Section 16 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Latabai Narcinha Telang, Widow of Narcinha Telang Vs. Shri Suresh ...
Mumbai
May-06-2005
Civil
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19A; Specific Relief Act - Sections 26; Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 152; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 3
2005(6)BomCR389; 2006(1)MhLj440
lift to grant such adjournment.]:[Explanation. - An agreement or compromise which is void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of this rule ]'The question, … account of divergent views taken by different High Courts as to whether the agreements which are voidable under Section 19A of the Contract Act are excluded or not. In the present case, having regard to the facts, in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnant Mahadeo Godbole Vs. Achut Ganesh Godbole and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-23-1981
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96(3) and 151 - Order 23, Rule 3 and 3A - Order 33, Rule 3 - Order 43, Rule 1, 1A, 1A(1) and 1A(2); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19A
AIR1981Bom357; 1981MhLJ640
to Rule 3, provides that an agreement or a compromise which is void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of this Rule. In other words, agreements or … adds a clarification again because of the earlier conflict as to whether voidable agreements within the meaning of Section 19A of the Indian Contract Act were or were not excluded from the operation of Rule 3 itself. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. Government Through Collector, Allahabad Vs. J.R. Bhatta
Allahabad
May-06-1955
ServiceCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 107 and 151 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 41, Rule 33; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16, 19A and 25; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 241(3); Constitution of India - Article 311; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1946 - Rule 17; Allahabad High Court Orders, 1946
AIR1956All439
17 and Order 41 Rule 33 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Sections 16, 19A, 25 of Contract Act, 1872, Section 241(3) (b) (iii) of Government of India Act, 1935, Rule 17 of High Court Rules and Orders (Allahabad)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPoma Dongra Vs. William Gillespie
Mumbai
Jan-16-1907
Contract
(1907)9BOMLR143
plaintiffs were in a position to dominate his will.;(1) That reading Sub-section 16 and 19A of the Indian Contract Act 1872 together the Court had the power to interfere and relieve a defendant against what might appear to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »