Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 199 · Page 1 of about 183 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 24 2001

Vasantha Viswanthan and ors. Vs. V.K. Elayalwar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-2001

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 31; Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 48A; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 24; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52; Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 199; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 19 and 58; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 19; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 91

Reported in : AIR2001SC3367; 2001(3)ARBLR110(SC); 2001(49)BLJR2289; JT2001(6)SC622; 2001(5)SCALE483; (2001)8SCC133

permits at a price to be ascertained was unlawful within the meaning of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and accordingly it would be void in view of the provisions of Section 24 of the Indian Contract … dismissing plaintiff's suit have been set aside and suit has been decreed. While Civil Appeal No. 599 of 1997 has been preferred against the main judgment whereby the High Court has decreed the suit, Civil Appeal No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 2008

Chendur Forgings (P) Ltd. Vs. Bhandari Interstate Carriers

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-23-2008

Subject : Contract

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2); Carriers Act - Sections 9; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16, 196 and 199; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 111; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77; Property Act - Sections 108 and 111; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80, 99 and 432 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 30 - Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2008Mad218; 2008(44)CTC75; 2008(2)CTLJ169(Mad)

extract Section 69(2) of The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 and Sections 16, 196 and 199 of The Indian Contract Act, 1872.12. Section 69(2) of The Indian Partnership Act, 1932, reads as under:69. Effect of non-registration. (1) ...(2) No suit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2006

Dr. Anil K. Khandelwal and 14 ors. Vs. Shri Maksud Saiyed and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 195, 197, 199, 340 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107, 120A, 120B, 175, 177, 181, 191, 196, 199, 192, 200, 209, 405, 409, 415, 420, 425, 463, 464, 468, 470, 471, 499 and 500; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 - Sections 3(2B); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(2) and 13(4); RDB Act, 1993; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 63 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Documentary Credit Rules; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) (Amendment) Act, 20003; Criminal Law

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3180; (2006)3GLR2043

and the accused persons, it also amounts to fraud of the Bank under Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. He has, therefore, submitted that the criminal complaint has been lodged by the complainant and the investigation is … to be investigated by the police under Section 156(3) of Criminal Procedure Code. He has further submitted that Section 199 of the Criminal Procedure Code makes it very clear that no Court shall take cognizance of an offence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 07 1975

The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd., Bombay and anr. Vs. the Union ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-07-1975

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 42(2), 43 and 120; Indian Contract Act - Sections 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : AIR1976AP261

provisions of this Act, be that of a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.(7) After any goods have been taken charge of and a receipt given for them under this section, no … was further found relying upon the Union of India v. M/s. Ralli Bros Ltd., (1968) 2 Mad LJ 199, that merely because defendants 1 and 2 have delivered the cargo to the third defendant, their responsibility as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2026

Imran Ahmed Ansari & Anr. vs Intex Technologies (India) Ltd & ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

statutes, rules, notification, etc. since long, and is also a part of common law. Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 uses the expression by stating that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, inter alia, … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 08.05.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 199/2025, I.A. 13085/2025 (Stay) & I.A. list of dates) IMRAN AHMED ANSARI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2023

M/s D. N. Singh Through Partner Dudheshwar Nath Singh Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-16-2023

Subject : Direct Taxation

carrier, the entrustment would amount to a contract of bailment within the meaning of Section 148 of the Contract Act, 1872 when it is for being carried by road, as in this case. A contract for bailment may not … 1961 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the Act’, for short). The assessment year involved in the impugned Order is 1996-1997. Appellant filed a Review Petition, i.e., Review Petition No.102 of 2009. By Order dated 18.12.2017, the Review Petition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2013

Flsmidth Pvt.Ltd Vs. Secan Invescast India Pltd

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-01-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

a restraint of trade, business or profession and would not be hit by Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as being void. Accordingly, the Delhi Court held that injunction could not be granted restraining Beckman Coulter from … employment; it applies only when the contract comes to an end." 29. In (1995) 5 SCC 54.= AIR 199.SC 237.- Gujarat Bottling Co.Ltd. and others Vs. Coca Cola Company and others, the agreement contained para 14 a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 27 2004

K. Ramachandra Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecuto ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-27-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 7, 9, 138, 139, 142 and 143 to 147; Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 183; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 5, 39, 142, 190, 190(1) 190(2) 192, 195 to 199, 200, 313 and 313(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60; Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002; General Clauses Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 202, 497 and 498

Reported in : 2005(2)ALT607; III(2005)BC111; 2005(2)CTC417; [2005(3)JCR390(AP)]

hearing before one of us (C.Y. Somayajulu, J.), since Powers of Attorney Act, 1882, and Section 183 of Contract Act, 1872, recognizing the principle QUI FACIT PER ALIUM FACIT PER SE were not considered while rendering the said decision, … ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. The accused in C.C.No. 2188 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, filed Criminal Petition No. 2332 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1954

Radha Kanta Pal Vs. United Bank of India Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-31-1954

Subject : BankingCommercial

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126 and 139

Reported in : AIR1955Cal217

'Co-operative Commission Shop Ltd. Chak Jhumra v. Udham Singh', AIR 1944 Lah 424 (A) and on Section 139, Contract Act. The Lahore decision of Harries C. J. and Mahajan J. lays down the well known principle that continued

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2013

National Highways Authority India Vs. Mecon-gea Energy Systems India L ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-02-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

unjust and opposed to public policy as it would be hit by provisions of Section 28 of the Contract Act, 1872. No doubt, the observations of the learned Single Judge in NHAI (supra) were concerning the prescription about the … passed by the Arbitral Tribunal by preferring an appeal under Section 37(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial