Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 194 · Page 1 of about 176 results (0.044 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 28 1959

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Amar Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-28-1959

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Limitation Act - Sections 19 - Schedule - Articles 30 and 31; Indian Railway Act, 1890 - Sections 77 and 80; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148, 151, 152, 161 and 194

Reported in : AIR1960SC233; [1960]2SCR75

provisions of the Act, be that of a bailee under s. 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 148 of the Indian Contract Act defines 'bailment' thus : 'A 'bailment' is the delivery of goods by … on its rails. 12. The same result could be achieved by approaching the case from the different perspective. Section 194 of the Indian Contract Act says : 'Where an agent, holding an express or implied authority to name

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1970

The Punjab National Bank Ltd. Vs. Ishwarbhai Bhai Lalbhai Patel and Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-13-1970

Subject : Banking

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 191, 192, 193 and 194; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1971Bom348; 1971MhLJ9

the question whether the defendant bank was liable for the plaintiff's claim :--;That Section 194 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 was applicable to the case,;that, therefore, the defendant bank must be taken to have an implied authority to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2006

Abdul Latheef Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-13-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 37(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182 and 194

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT361

being an agent of respondent No. 2 by virtue of the provisions contained in Section 194 of the Contract Act, 1872, he is entitled to invoke the arbitration clause in the agreement executed between respondents 2 and 3. In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 2005

Commissioner of Income Tax and anr. Vs. P. Surendra Prabhu

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Contract Act, 1872; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 10, 10(10C), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(1), 17(3), 57, 89, 89(1), 119, 192, 192(2A), 194, 201(1), 201(1A), 260A and 245C; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 7, 7(1) and 17; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2 and 25F; Finance Act, 1987; Central, State or Provincial Act; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Income Tax Rules - Rules 2BA, 21A, 21A(1) and 21AA; Service Law

Reported in : (2005)198CTR(Kar)209; ILR2005KAR5906; [2005]279ITR402(KAR); [2005]279ITR402(Karn)

also permissible in law.'The Court has further stated :'Once it is held that the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, would be applicable, the scheme admittedly being contractual in nature, the provisions of the Act shall apply. The … Section 201(1A) of the Act against the respondent-bank for violating the provisions of Sections 192, 192(2A) read with Section 194 of the Act. The Asstt. CIT (TDS), after considering the reply filed by the respondent-bank to the show-cause

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1929

T.C. Chowdhury and Bros. Vs. Girindra Mohan Neogi

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-06-1929

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 121Ind.Cas.636

acting as the agent of the plaintiffs or of the defendant Bank. The material sections of the Indian Contract Act (IX of 1872) are Sections 191, 192, 194 and 195 which run as follows:15. Section 191. A 'sub-agent'

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 1942

Ramchandra Lalbhai Vs. Chinubhai Lalbhai

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-17-1942

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR1075

exclude them from management. Plaintiff No. 1 becomes the managing agent by virtue of exhibits H and N. Section 194 of the Indian Contract Act applies to the nomination, and such nomination cannot be revoked without the consent … No. 1 by defendant is revocable as it is not coupled with interest; Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.13. V.F. Taraporevala. Chinubhai Lalbhai & Bros., Ltd., was formed as a device to get capital and deposits for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2003

M.S. Madhusoodhanan and anr. Vs. Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-01-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 2(13), 81, 81(1), 81(2) and 284; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 31(1), 108, 155, 159, 161(2), 164, 189(2), 193, 193(1), 194, 195, 397, 398, 402, 403 and 446; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(10), 4, 9, 8(2), 9(1) and 9(2); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 29; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 16, 20 and 20(2); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 12; Arbitration Act, 1940; Evidence Act - Sections 16 and 114; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 28B and 265; Citizenship Rules - Rules 3, 59 and 60; Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 18; Stamps Act

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD1(SC); [2003]117CompCas19(SC); (2003)4CompLJ185(SC); 2003(6)SCALE191; (2004)9SCC204; [2003]46SCL695(SC)

party is capable of being made certain and is not invalid as provided under Section 29 of the Contract Act, 1872 [See: Illustration (e)]. In view of such categoric and clear statutory provisions, the submission of learned counsel representing … evidence already on record and the repeated admissions of Mani and his group before the Court.47. Furthermore, under Section 194 of the Companies Act, 1956, minutes of meetings kept in accordance with the provisions of Section 193 shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1963

Udhoo Dass Vs. Prem Prakash and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-06-1963

Subject : TenancyContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act - Sections 7(2); Uttar Pradesh Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR1964All1

in the negative.Reference answered in the negative. Contract - contract of tenancy - Sections 10 and 23 of Contract Act, 1872 - contract of tenancy entered into in violation of order under section 7(2) of U.P. (Temporary) Control of … 2 is the owner of a shop governed by the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 194/ and had let it out to Sharma Provision Stores. On 1-2-52 respondent No. 1 who will be referred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2009

E.R. Kalaivan Vs. the Inspector General of Registration and the Sub-re ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-09-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 22A, 22A(1), 32A and 34; Registration (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 17 and 18; Andhra Pradesh Registration Rules - Rule 26; Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62

Reported in : AIR2010Mad18; (2009)6MLJ1009

in a case of sale deed. In this context, we may refer to Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which provides that contract which need not be performed. By that provision, any novation, rescission and alteration of … Pleader would submit that a similar question came up for consideration before this Court in Writ Appeal No. 194 of 2009 and by judgment dated 1.4.2009, this Court held that such a registration of cancellation deed cannot

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2013

M/S Kashyap???s Vs. Bata India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-05-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Agreement to be terminable by a 15 days notice only. Relying on Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, it is contended that the plaintiff by remaining quiet after the letter dated 1 st February, 2003 of … of evidence on this aspect.33. As far back as in S.M. Bholat v. Yokohama Specie Bank Ltd. AIR 194.Rangoon 270 it was held that silence to a letter is not acceptance of the terms proposed in it.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial