Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 191 · Page 1 of about 185 results (0.075 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 12 1960

Dadi Bhogalingam Vs. Indo Commercial Bank Ltd. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-12-1960

Subject : BankingContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 191 and 192

Reported in : AIR1961AP346

has no merits and is, therefore, dismissed with costs. Contract - Banking - Sections 191 and 192 of Contract Act, 1872 - issue whether defendant 2 is sub agent of defendant 1 or substituted agent of plaintiff for purpose … second defendant and it furnishes a sure indication of creation of sub-agency.But a 'sub-agent' within the meaning of Section 191 of the Indian Contract Act 'is a person employed by and acting under the control of, the original

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1970

The Punjab National Bank Ltd. Vs. Ishwarbhai Bhai Lalbhai Patel and Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-13-1970

Subject : Banking

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 191, 192, 193 and 194; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1971Bom348; 1971MhLJ9

the question whether the defendant bank was liable for the plaintiff's claim :--;That Section 194 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 was applicable to the case,;that, therefore, the defendant bank must be taken to have an implied authority to … of the Contract Act, the Laxmi Bank, Gondia Branch would not be a sub-agent as is understood in Section 191 of the Contract Act and would be an Agent of the principal that is, the plaintiff, for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2006

Nav Bharat Corporation Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-12-2006

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 61 and 62; Indian Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 5 and 12; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 55; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73, 191 and 192; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 6, Rule 14

Reported in : 2006(2)MPHT72; 2006(2)MPLJ306

CPC and has jurisdiction to deal with matter Contract - Sub-agent - Section 191 and 192 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Whether appellant liable to pay damages suffered due to some failure on part of sub-agent appointed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 28 1989

Patel Dadubhai Narsibhai (Decd.) Through His Heirs and Lrs. Jayaben D. ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-28-1989

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (1990)1GLR673

between defendant-Board and plaintiff No. 1. Thus as far as the pre-condition of applicability of Section 73 of Contract Act, 1872 is concerned, it is clear that the contract was between the defendant-Board and plaintiff No. 1-Dadubhai Narsibhai Patel. … The oral evidence led by the defendant-Board consists of one Pinakinprasad Jivatram, Deputy Engineer of the Board (Ex. 191).8. The evidence led by the parties disclose the following facts:Plaintiff No. 2 is a partnership firm registered under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2000

Hari Singh Nalwa Vs. Kartar Singh Bhadana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-10-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 9(A), 17 and 81; Constitution of India - Articles 191 and 286; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 4(4), 4 to 13, 14, 15 and 18; Punjab Minor Mineral Concessions Rules, 1964 - Rules 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 25; Mines Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR2001P& H86

the Constitution or under Section 9A of the Act.42. Even according to the definition of contract under Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract is an agreement enforceable by law, which is made of two elements, namely, an agreement and … the subsisting of such contracts, respondent No. 1 in my view was disqualified from contesting the election.41. Article 191 of the Constitution of India lays down the disqualifications for membership of any State Legislative and it provides

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2006

Dr. Anil K. Khandelwal and 14 ors. Vs. Shri Maksud Saiyed and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 195, 197, 199, 340 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107, 120A, 120B, 175, 177, 181, 191, 196, 199, 192, 200, 209, 405, 409, 415, 420, 425, 463, 464, 468, 470, 471, 499 and 500; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 - Sections 3(2B); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(2) and 13(4); RDB Act, 1993; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 63 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Documentary Credit Rules; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) (Amendment) Act, 20003; Criminal Law

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3180; (2006)3GLR2043

and the accused persons, it also amounts to fraud of the Bank under Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. He has, therefore, submitted that the criminal complaint has been lodged by the complainant and the investigation is … in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara, for the offences punishable under Sections 107, 120-B, 177, 181, 191, 192, 200, 209, 405, 409, 415, 420, 425, 463, 464, 468, 470, 471, 499 and 500 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2026

Man Industries (India) Limited vs Gail (India) Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-11-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

liable to pay compensation. It would be against the specific provisions of Sections 73 and 74 of the Contract Act, 1872. There was nothing on record that compensation contemplated by the parties was in any way unreasonable. It has … and Ms. Nikita Chauhan, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALJUDGMENTAMIT BANSAL, J.1. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) on behalf of the claimant in the arbitration … Reserved on: 20th February, 2026Judgment pronounced on: 11th March, 2026+ O.M.P. (COMM) 191/2019 MAN INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1930

Scott and Hodgson Limited Vs. Keshavlal-nathubhai Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-1930

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 128Ind.Cas.26

for the time being in England.28. We were also referred to the authorities which show that the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is not a complete Code, and that if there is a clear omission in the Act to provide … pass until the whole of the purchase price had been paid, was valid and effective having regard to Sections 83 and 77 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872. There were several other issues raised in the … own in A. Cecil Coole v. Nanalal Moraji Dave 92 Ind. Cas. 191 : 26 Bom. L.R. 880 : 49 B. 172 : A.I.R. 1925

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2005

Meet Road Lines Vs. United India Insurance Company and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-12-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 3, 6, 8, 9 and 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; Contract Act - Sections 190 and 191

Reported in : AIR2005AP485

Devarakonda Chandra Mouli, 1983 (2) APLJ 188 wherein it was held:'Under Sections 190 and 191 of the Indian Contract Act the sub-agent is a person employed by and acting under the control of the agent. The principal has … that Section 9 of the Act is not repugnant, to Sections 101 - 104 of their Indian Evidence Act 1872. In Hindustan Corporation (Hyderabad) Pvt. Ltd. v. U. I. F. G. Insurance Co. Ltd. : AIR1997AP347 it was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2005

Canteen Mazdoor Sabha (Regd.) and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-18-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(3)SLJ118CAT

pro-rata pension.Learned Counsel states that once the option has been withdrawn on 22.2.2000, Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 makes an agreement illegal, if it is forbidden by law and as opposed to public policy.13. Learned Counsel … AAI as deputationists till their absorption.M.M.R. Khan and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors., 1990 (Supp.) SCC 191, regarding grievance of Railway Canteen workers pertaining to the Statutory canteen, held that there cannot be a distinction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial