Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 189 · Page 1 of about 182 results (0.031 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 1981

Dhanbhagvati and anr. Vs. Mandsaur Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Mandsaur

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1981

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rules 1 and 9; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 185(1)

Reported in : AIR1981MP259

between him and them, with them during their joint lives. This is what Section 45 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, inter alia provides. Accordingly, in absence of a contract expressing the contrary intention, the promise made by the … of the suit lands as sub-tenant on 2-10-1959; that in the absence of resumption of the land under Section 189 of the Code, the defendant became Bhumiswami for the suit lands and that the plaintiff had lost right

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1996

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hassan Chand and Sons

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-22-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 26A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184, 184(4), 185, 185(5), 187 to 189, 246, 297 and 297(2); Income Tax (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1962 - Schedule - Articles 2 and 3; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 37

Reported in : [1997]224ITR244(Raj)

there was no corresponding provision like Section 37 in the repealed Sections 239 to 266 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which were replaced by the present Indian Partnership Act, 1932. By giving a place to this section in … 146, 153 (except Sub-section (2) and Clause (iii) of Sub-section (3)), Sections 156 to 158, 185, 187 to 189, 282 to 284 and 288.21. It is thus quite evident that the matter of registration of a firm

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 1975

C.V. George and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-27-1975

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(7), 2(31) and 222(2)

Reported in : [1976]102ITR724(Ker)

this Sub-rule shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the provisions of Section 247 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. (2) Where the decree-holder claims to be entitled to cause the decree to be executed against any person … dues of a firm available under the Partnership Act can be applied only in the case envisaged under Section 189 of the Act; (c) the proceedings arc hit by Articles 19(1)(f) and 265 of the Constitution ; and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 20 2004

Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and India Steamship Co. Ltd. Vs. the Union o ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-20-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(4); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 186 to 189, 222, 223 and 230

Reported in : 2005(1)CTLJ420(Mad); (2004)4MLJ599

the plaintiff.21. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants by taking us through Section 230 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 ( in short 'the Act') and various decisions would contend that in any event the first defendant, being … issued by the Madras Port Trust vide Exs.D.11 dated 30.03.1987 and P.4 dated 17.06.1987. Further, Sections 186 to 189 of the Act, make it clear about the agent's liability and in the light of the materials placed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1996

Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hassan Chand and Sons.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-22-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)133CTR(Raj)284

there was no corresponding provision like s. 37 in the repealed ss. 239 to 266 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which were replaced by the present Indian Partnership Act, 1932. By giving a place to this section in … 146, 153 [except sub-s. (2) and cl. (iii) of sub-s. (3)], ss. 156 to 158, 185, 187 to 189, 282 to 284 and 288.6. It is thus quite evident that the matter of registration of a firm

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1945

istak Kamu Musalman Vs. Ranchod Zipru Bhate and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-12-1945

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1947Bom198

or consideration past cohabitation, and that they are void under Section 6(h), T.P. Act, read with Section 23, Contract Act.5. Under Section 23, Contract Act, the consideration or object of an agreement is unlawful if the Court regards … transfer can be made for an unlawful object or consideration within the meaning of Section 23, Contract Act, 1872.6. There is no doubt that a transfer in consideration of future illicit cohabitation is for an immoral consideration … are concerned in this appeal only with four gift deeds, Exs. 185, 189, 184 and 186.2. There is no substance in the contention of defendants

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2021

M/s. Padia Timber Co. P. Ltd. Vs. The Board Of Trustees Of Visakhapatn ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2021

Subject : MRTP

contract between the Respondent-Port Trust and the Appellant, the Trial Court relied on Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which is set out hereinbelow for convenience: “4. Communication when complete.-The communication of a proposal is complete when … High Court in M/s Saraya Distillery, Sardarbaggar v. Union of India 1. AIR1998AP3812. AIR1963SC14053. AIR1998Karnataka 354 4. AIR1979Madras 189 5. AIR1915Privy Council 48 6. AIR1984Delhi 360 7. AIR1962SC366(V49 C57) 8. AIR1979SC133914 and Anr. (supra), the Trial Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2001

Ericsson Communication Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)81ITD77(Delhi)

the Government of India. According to him, such agreement was void by virtue of the provisions of the Contract Act, 1872, and, therefore, no enforceable right accrued from such agreement. He also drew our attention to para 6(ii) of … the case of Nonsuch Tea Estate Ltd. v. CIT (1975) 98 ITR 189 (SC) wherein it has been ruled that the expenditure, which required approval … of convenience. ITA No. 4494 is against the order of the CIT(A) confirming the action of AO under Section 201(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (Act in short) demanding the tax which ought to have been deducted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2026

Uv Asset Reconstruction Company Limited versus Electrosteel Castings L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-06-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 130

of Undertaking; and whether Clause 2.2 constitutes a contract of guarantee within the meaning of s.126 of the Contract Act, 1872 thereby rendering ECL as a guarantor to SREI in respect of financial facilities availed by ESL from SREI.Headnotes†Insolvency … Ltd., 2 WLR 1175; Associated British Courts v. Ferryways [2009] EWCA Civ. 189; Shanghai Shipyard Co. Ltd. v. Reignwood International Investment (Group) Co. Ltd.:[2021] EWCA … Kartik Pandey, Ms. Nitika Grover, Nishant Anshul.Judgment / Order of the Supreme CourtJudgmentAlok Aradhe, J.INTRODUCTION1. This appeal under Section 62 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,2016 (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘Code’) calls in question the legality and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1965

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Mahadeolal Prabhudayal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-23-1965

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72(1), 72(2), 72(3) and 77; ;Indian contract Act, 1872 - Sections 152 and 161; Carriers Act, 1865; ;Evidence Act - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1965SC1755; 1966(0)BLJR91; [1965]3SCR145

railway to be the same as that of a bailee under Sections 152 and 161 of the Indian contract Act, 1872, subject to other provisions of the Act. Sub-section (2) of s. 72 provides that an agreement purporting to … first contended that the suit was barred by s. 77 of the Indian Railways Act, No. IX of 1890, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), inasmuch as notice required therein was not given by the respondent. Secondly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial