Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 184 · Page 1 of about 170 results (0.044 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 10 1968

Rama Shankar Singh and anr. Vs. Mst. Shyamlata Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-10-1968

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 43; Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 67(1), 184 and 193 - Schedule - Article 2

Reported in : AIR1970SC716; 1970(0)BLJR556; [1969]2SCR360

on default of payment of rent for two consecutive years. Having regard to sec. 43 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defendants 1 and 2 were jointly and severally liable to pay the rent. It was not disputed before … defendant to raise the point of limitation, though the plea was not taken in the written statement. Under Section 184 of the Bihar Tenancy Act a suit instituted after the expiry of the period of limitation is liable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1987

Grace Pharma Distributors Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-15-1987

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184, 185 and 256(2); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 30

Reported in : (1987)65CTR(AP)252; [1988]169ITR231(AP)

- registration - Sections 184, 185 and 256 (2) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 23 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Section 30 of Partnership Act, 1932 - whether assessee firm not entitled to registration under Sections 184

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1991

C.E.S.C. Limited and ors. Vs. Subhash Chandra Bose and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-15-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 182 and 184; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39 and 226; Empolyed State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 2(9) India Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 36(2), 37, 45, 51, 64, 123(4) and 125(8); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 4, 18 and 20

Reported in : AIR1992SC573; 46(1992)DLT290(SC); JT1991(6)SC373; 1992LabIC332; (1992)ILLJ475SC; 1991(2)SCALE996; (1992)1SCC441; [1991]Supp2SCR267; 1992(1)LC111(SC)

between the employee and the C.E.S.C. to the exclusion of the electrical contractor.19. Section 182 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines 'agent' as a person employed to do any act or to represent another in dealing with third … third persons, the person for whom such act is done, or is so represented is called the 'principal'. Section 184 of the said Act further provides that as between Principal and the third person any person may become

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 03 2002

Pati Chandraiah Vs. D. Satyanarayana

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182 and 184

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD729

shall be no order as to costs. Commercial - refund of investment - Sections 182 and 184 of Contract Act, 1872 - failure of financial institution to deliver documents regarding investment to depositor - whether agent of such institution … circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Commercial - refund of investment - Sections 182 and 184 of Contract Act, 1872 - failure of financial institution to deliver documents regarding investment to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1951

Ramchandra Laxman and ors. Vs. the Bank of Kolhapur

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-1951

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 171 and 176; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 253; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 34, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1952Bom315; (1952)54BOMLR245; ILR1952Bom715

non-compoundable offence which has been taken cognizance of, is against public policy under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and is therefore void and unenforceable.'There, again, the same principle to which we have referred above was accepted, … decision of their Lordships of the Privy Council reported in 'HARI SHANKAR v. KEDAR NATH' 66 Ind App 184. Their Lordships of the Privy Council held in that case that where the parties professing to create a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1996

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hassan Chand and Sons

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-22-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 26A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184, 184(4), 185, 185(5), 187 to 189, 246, 297 and 297(2); Income Tax (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1962 - Schedule - Articles 2 and 3; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 37

Reported in : [1997]224ITR244(Raj)

there was no corresponding provision like Section 37 in the repealed Sections 239 to 266 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which were replaced by the present Indian Partnership Act, 1932. By giving a place to this section in … s. 184(4).Ratio :The Tribunal was justified in holding that assessing officer's order purported to have been passed under section 184(4) was, in fact, an order under section 185(5) and as such was an appealable order under section 246(g).Held

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1980

Durgaprasad Rajaram Adatiya Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-26-1980

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(23), 184(4), 184(7), 185(1) and 246(1); Partnership Act

Reported in : (1981)21CTR(MP)4; [1982]134ITR601(MP)

in Pitchiah Chettiar v. Subramanian Chettiar ILR [1935] Mad 25, with reference to Section 253(2) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which was identically worded as Section 13(b) of the Partnership Act, there are two presumptions clubbed together in … favour of the assessee, whether the assessee-firm is entitled to the benefits of continuation of registration under Section 184(7) or Section 185(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70 ' 2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1993

Kerala Publicity Bureau Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-21-1993

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1950 - Sections 20 and 27; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 13

Reported in : [1993]200ITR366(Ker)

; [1935] ILR 58 Mad 25. The above decision considered the scope of Section 253(2) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which is reproduced in Section 13(b) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, and it was held that two … individual shares of partners in losses also should be specified in the partnership deed, to enable registration under Section 184 of the Income-tax Act, would apply even in cases where minors are not admitted to the benefits of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1983

Mahendrakumar Chandulal Vs. Central Bank of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-30-1983

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1984)1GLR237

the bill of lading from liability for the negligence of its servants notwithstanding Section 151 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This is also a Division Bench judgment wherein on the point under consideration, it has been observed as … is a binding precedent.22. The case of British India Steam Navigation Co. v. Ratansi (1898) ILR 22 Bom. 184 turned merely on the construction of bill of lading under consideration. One does not find that a consideration

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2006

D. Srinivasan, Gautham S. Varad, Vs. H.S. Viswanath, Mohan Reddy and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Sep-04-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)75SCL59

Furthermore, the cancellation deed is not supported by any consideration. By virtue of Section 25 of the Indian contract Act, 1872 any agreement without consideration is void. The exceptions to this rule are inapplicable to the present transactions. The … furnishing the requisite documents concerning the property, compelling the second respondent to file civil suit in O.S. No. 184 of 2002 for an order of permanent injunction restraining the third respondent herein, from alienating or encumbering the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial