Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 181 · Page 1 of about 188 results (0.031 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 1999

State Bank of India, Its Branch Manager, Tirupattur Vs. Kasim, Proprie ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-27-1999

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 34, Rule 5, 16; Indian Contract Act, 1872 -- Sections 139,140, 141; Limitation Act, 1963 -- Article 137 and 181

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC109

because the State lost or parted with the security he stood discharged. By S. 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, where a guaranteed debt has become due, or default of the principal debtor to perform a guaranteed duty … any petition for final decree and thereby the plaintiff has lost his right over the mortgage security.9 Under Section 139 of the Contract Act, if the creditor omits to do any act which is his duty to … as provided for under the decree, and as stated earlier, old Article 181 corresponding to Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, would be applicable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2005

Kaju Devi and anr. Vs. H.S. Rudrappa Alias Rudy and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-08-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 31; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69; Evidence Act - Sections 120; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 181 and 182; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 18, Rule 2 - Order 20, Rule 12; Constitution of India - Articles 141, 363 and 366(22)

Reported in : ILR2005KAR4370; 2006(2)KarLJ551

Order 18 Rule 2 CPC read with Section 120 of the Evidence Act and Section 182 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, which provisions do not prohibit the GP.A. Holder of plaintiffs to examine himself as a witness in the … power of attorney Act, Order 3 Rule 2 code of civil Procedure R/w Section 120 of Evidence Act, Section 181 and 182 of the Indian Contract Act. It is not the case of the defendants that PW1 in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 1958

Jodhai Ramdayal Vs. Bharat Sukhdi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-05-1958

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Schedule - Article 15; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172 to 181

Reported in : AIR1959MP97

that the case of Bhubotarinee Ghosamy 16 Suth WR 58 was decided before the enactment of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which has now codified the rights between the pawner and the pawnee, arising out of a bailment of … Thereafter, the rights of the parties are governed by Sections 172 to 181 of the Indian Contract Act. Therefore, where the pawner sues for redemption … P.K. Tare, J.1. The defendant has filed this revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act against the decree passed by Shri S. N. Awasthy, Small

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 16 1932

Hansraj Gupta Vs. the Official Liquidators, Dehra-dun Elec. Tramway Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-16-1932

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1933)35BOMLR319

reargument in regard to the sum of Rs. 35,000. They claimed that under Section 65 of the Indian Contract Act (IX of 1872) they only became entitled to recover the Rs. 35,000 when the agreement under which it … common ground that the only Article in that schedule which could apply to such an application is Article 181: but a series of authorities commencing with Bai Manekbai v. Manekji Kavasji I.L.R. (1880) Bom. 213 has taken

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2008

New Engineering Works and Asl Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkh ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-23-2008

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitutiona of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 298 and 300A; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Electricity Supply Code Regulation, 2005; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 50 and 181; Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission' (Electricity Supply Code) Regulation, 2005; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Electricity Rules, 1946

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2898; [2008(4)JCR5(Jhr)]

Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 298 and 300A of the Constitutional of India and Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as the same are unjust, unfair, unreasonable and against the public interest and further for quashing the Final … same way as above. 5. The Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission, in exercise of its power conferred by Section 181 read with Section 50 of the Electricity Act, 2003, darned regulation called 'Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission' (Electricity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2000

M. Thanikachalam and Others Vs. Maduranthakam Agricultural Producers C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-11-2000

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Constitution of India -- Articles 12, 21, 226 and 227; Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 -- Sections 152, 153 and 154; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 -- Sections 9-A, 10, 11-A, 12(3), 18(1) and 25-FN; Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 -- Sections 181; Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 -- Sections 75; Indian Contract Act, 1872 -- Sections 23; Employee's State Insurance Act, 1948 -- Sections 1(3), 74 and 75

Reported in : 2000(4)CTC556; (2001)ILLJ285Mad

the order of termination dated 31.7.1995 are void and illegal, being violative of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, Article 21 of the Constitution of India and Sections 25-F and 25-N of the Industrial Disputes Act, after … Chapter XVIII of the Act, the power of the Registrar to give directions in the public interest under Section 181 of the Act and in such cases, the orders so passed by the statutory body is certainly amenable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2006

Dr. Anil K. Khandelwal and 14 ors. Vs. Shri Maksud Saiyed and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 195, 197, 199, 340 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107, 120A, 120B, 175, 177, 181, 191, 196, 199, 192, 200, 209, 405, 409, 415, 420, 425, 463, 464, 468, 470, 471, 499 and 500; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 - Sections 3(2B); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(2) and 13(4); RDB Act, 1993; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 63 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Documentary Credit Rules; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) (Amendment) Act, 20003; Criminal Law

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3180; (2006)3GLR2043

and the accused persons, it also amounts to fraud of the Bank under Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. He has, therefore, submitted that the criminal complaint has been lodged by the complainant and the investigation is … Ltd., in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara, for the offences punishable under Sections 107, 120-B, 177, 181, 191, 192, 200, 209, 405, 409, 415, 420, 425, 463, 464, 468, 470, 471, 499 and 500 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2018

Rakesh Kumar Vats vs.vinod Kumar Chahel

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-09-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

an agreement to sell then that act of forfeiture is one falling under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and that Section 74 of the Contract Act would only apply if the contract is of such a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2026

Krishna Udyog vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-09-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

statutes, rules, notification, etc. since long, and is also a part of common law. Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 uses the expression by stating that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, inter alia, … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 09.04.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 181/2024 & I.A. 9043/2024 (Ex.) KRISHNA UDYOG .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamlesh Ojha, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

MSRT Corporation Vs. M/s. Navketan Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-13-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the case of the respondent that the respondent could claim such amount under section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. 56. A perusal of the oral evidence led by the respondent and also the petitioner clearly indicates that … the case of McDermott International INC vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and Ors., reported in (2006) 11 SCC 181 and in particular paragraphs 59, 60 and 61 and would submit that the scope of section 34 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial