Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 180 · Page 1 of about 248 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 24 1915

Ramnath Gagoi Vs. Pitambar Deb Goswami

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-24-1915

Subject : Contract

Reported in : 31Ind.Cas.430

the purchase had been made. There is no foundation for this argument, as secti6n 180 of the Indian Contract Act provides that if a third person deprives the bailee of the use or possession of the goods bailed … - Partners, rights of, to purchase partnership property--Settled account, action for balance of, maintainability of--Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 180--Bailor and bailee-Suit against wrongdoer, who can maintain. -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2002

Rhodia Ltd. and ors. Vs. Neon Laboratories Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 9A and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Maharashtra Amendment) Act; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 46; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR2002Bom502; 2003(1)BomCR140; 2003(1)MhLj373

tribunals in India to be ousted. For this purpose, reliance is placed on Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as well as on the decision of the Delhi High Court in : AIR1991Delhi285 in Rajendra Sethia v. … to Dicey and Morris in the conflict of laws, 11th Edition, Vol. II (Diecy), which refers to Rule 180. The Apex Court has reproduced the said Rule as well as the relevant portion of the opinion of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2004

Sushil Kumar Vs. Neelam

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-18-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3690; I(2005)DMC619

settled that any contract which is opposed to public policy is void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the same cannot be enforced in a Court of law. If the object or consideration of an … not amount to live separately by mutual con-sent. Similarly, in Rohtash Singh v. Ramendri (Smt.) (2000) 3 SCC 180 : (2000 Cri LJ 1498), the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that on account of explanation (b) to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 01 2026

M/s Sri Vasan Minerals Vs M/S. Totale Global Pvt.ltd.,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-01-2026

written or oral contract. Consequently, he contended that the suit is maintainable under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (the Contract Act). With regard to a claim under Section 70 of the Contract Act, he relied on … judgment of the Bombay High Court in M/sDinshlaw and Dinshlaw and another v. Indoswe Engineers, AIR 1995 Bom 180. He contended that the aggregate value of unpaid invoices represents reasonable compensation for the non-gratuitous supply of goods

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2018

M/S Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-13-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

be proved in accordance with law, as under: “33. Section 74 occurs in Chapter 6 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which reads "Of the consequences of breach of contract". It is in fact sandwiched between Sections 73 and … specifying therein that as per Schedule A, already issued on 10.09.2009, the delivery schedule of the tyres i.e. 180 days FAO52of 2018 Page 1 of 11 from the receipt of BPC. Notably a date was added in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2012

Elof Hansson (i) Pvt. Ltd. and anr Vs. Shree Acids and Chemicals Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

qua defendant No.2 is that it is the holding company of defendant No.1..5. Section 230 of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads as under:-.230. Agent cannot personally enforce, nor be bound by, contracts on behalf of principal.- In the … 300 MT with permissible variation of + -10% USD 75/MT + interest @9%/annum for a period of maximum 180 days from B/L date. Price basis: CIF Bombay by sea. Shipment: Jan/Feb.97. Payment: By an irrevocable telex operative

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1965

The Morvi Mercantile Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Thro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-03-1965

Subject : Contract

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 4 and 137

Reported in : AIR1965SC1954; [1965]35CompCas629(SC); [1965]3SCR254

The Judicial Committee held that the railway receipts were instruments of title within the meaning of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, s.103, and that the sellers were therefore not entitled to stop the goods except upon payment or tender … supra, with the difference that it expressly includes therein railway receipt. Under s.4 thereof the Chapter and the sections of the Act shall be taken as part of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. In 1930 Parliament in … pledges. The answer to this question depends upon the construction of s. 180 of the Contract Act, it reads: "If a third person wrongfully deprives

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2013

Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited Vs. Mumbai Internationa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-23-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

loss, we must keep in mind provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 as well as the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Reference to sections 14, 16 and 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 which respectively deal with the … in payment of such liquidated damages by the Petitioner of more than 180 days, Respondent No. 1 would be entitled to terminate the SR Agreement. … Oral Judgment: The Petitioner by invoking the provisions of section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [for short “the said Act”] is seeking following interim measures

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2026

Sahaj Bharti Travels vs Hcl Technologies Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-23-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

180/2026 Page 22 of 26(Civ) 204] , this Court, after referring to the provisionsof Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872; earlier decision of this Court in Gherulal [Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya, 1959 SCC OnLine SC 4 :

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1997

M.N. Karani Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-1997

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1998)64ITD119(Mum.)

the Agreement dated 11-4-1983, between HCGL and the assessee was not void under section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as it was also an agreement of service contained in restrictive covenant preventing the assessee from working elsewhere … 31-12-1982. This shows that the assessee gave a notice of only one month and 11 days as against 180 days stipulated in the agreement. If the assessee was so indispensible why did the company allow the assessee

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial