Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contract act 1872 section 17 · Page 1 of about 4,607 results (0.111 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 18 2012

Hardip Kaur Vs. Kailash and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

other findings of the Trial Court mentioned in paras 13 and 15 above. 18. Section 202 of the Contract Act, 1872 Section 202 of the Contract Act, 1872 provides that the Power of Attorney coupled with interest is irrevocable and … or charge on the suit property in view of Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. 17. The plaintiff has not challenged the other findings of the Trial Court mentioned in paras 13 and 15

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1989

Mahabir Kishore and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-31-1989

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17, 17(1) - Schedule - Articles 24 and 113; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas16(SC); JT1989(3)SC327; (1989)4SCC1a

in the former.17. A tax paid under mistake of law is refundable under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. In Sales Tax Officer v. Kanhaiya Lal : [1959]1SCR1350 where the respondent, a registered firm, paid sales tax

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2021

Anheuser Busch Inbev India Limited Vs. Scarpe Marketing Pvt Ltd

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the original claim statement and by way of an amendment claim under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 was made. It is contended that aforesaid claims are entirely different and causes of action for filing the … or sub-section (3) of section 16; or 28 (b) granting or refusing to grant an interim measure under section 17. (3) No second appeal shall lie from an order passed in appeal under this section, but nothing in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 22 2015

C.S. Atwal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Ludhiana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-22-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

been given to the developers and thus, it partakes the colour of contract under Section 202 of Indian Contract Act, 1872. Therefore, termination of agency in the present case could not be effected by the transferor in view of … of 1882 Act is registered, it shall not have effect for purposes of Section 53A of 1882 Act. Section 17(1A) as incorporated and Section 49 of the 1908 Act as amended read thus:- "17(1A). The documents containing contracts

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1971

Raghunath Gopal Daftardar Vs. Sau, Vijaya Raghunath Daftardar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-15-1971

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12(1) and 12(2); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR1972Bom132; (1971)73BOMLR840; ILR1972Bom511; 1972MhLJ110

consent of either party to the marriage was obtained by coercion or fraud, as defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Now, fraud is defined in Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which runs thus :- '

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2003

Adwel Advertising (P) Ltd. Vs. N.D.M.C. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 18

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)452; 2003(1)ARBLR695(Delhi); II(2003)BC345; 2004(72)DRJ500

orders becoming prolix.10. Reliance is also placed by Mr. Mehta on Sections 17 & 18 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 in substantiating his contention that the N.D.M.C. cannot be accused of any fraud or misrepresentation. Prima facie, this … Copy of this Judgment be given dusty to the learned counsel for the parties. Contract Act, 1872 - Section 17, 18--Bank guarantee--Invocation--Injunction--Vacation--Over-payment pursuant to bank guarantee--Power of court to grant injunction--Available only if the plaintiff shows that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2006

Reliance Salt Ltd. Vs. Cosmos Enterprises and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-22-2006

Subject : ContractBanking

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 126; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100A

Reported in : I(2007)BC480(SC); [2006]134CompCas645(SC); JT2006(10)SC529; 2006(12)SCALE286

supply, late supply and short supply of consignments. 9. 'Fraud' is defined in Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 in the following terms:Section 17. 'Fraud' defined.- 'Fraud' means and includes any of the following acts committed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1978

Uniclel Ltd. and anr. Vs. the State Trading Corporation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-29-1978

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi203

of fraud pleaded by the Unicel has to be decided under sections 17 and 19 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Under section 17 an act or omission including silence when there is a duty to speak has to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1990

C.K. Xavier Vs. Sri Kasi and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-27-1990

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 65

Reported in : AIR1990Ker271

of Limitation Act, 1963, Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 65 of Contract Act, 1872 - suit for recovery of certain amount by sale of schedule property on strength of hypothecation bond -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 1951

Narsingdas Takhatmal Vs. Radhakisan Rambakas and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-1951

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 9

Reported in : (1952)54BOMLR492

then dealt with the argument that the representation found proved amounted to fraud as defined in Section 17(3), Contract Act, 1872.That contention was also overruled, because there was no finding that the defendant at the time of making the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial