Advanced Search Results

Dr. P. Chattopadhyay Vs. the Institute of Cost and Works Accountants o ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 7(1), 7(2), 9, 12(2), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 17, 17(3), 20, 32(1), 39, 39(1), 39(2), 39(3), 39(4) and 47; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 167 and 617; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 32, 36, 39, 41, 89, 188, 132, 133(1), 217(1), 226, 298, 308, 309, 311, 311(2) and 367; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16(1), 23 and 25; ;Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; ;Air Corporation Act, 1853; ;Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Sections 32 and 47; ;Societies Registration Act; ;Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976; ;Government of India Act, 1935 - Section 240(3); ;Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 58(1), 58(2) and 58(1)(2); ;General' Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 14 to 16; ;Madras District Muni

Reported in : (1987)0CALLT179(HC)

and whether an unconsciable term in a contract of employment is void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as being opposed to public policy and when such a term is contained in a contract of employment … West Bengal and the State of Assam in the respective appeals. On the basis of the definition under Section 167 of the Companies Act, 1956, it was indicated that as all the shares of the Corporation were held

K.S. Ramachandran Vs. Ragistrar of Cooperative Societies and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 237; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 167

Reported in : AIR1963Mad105; [1963]33CompCas807(Mad)

nisiis made absolute. There will be no order as to costs. Commercial - authority - Section 237 of Contract Act, 1872 and Section 167 of Evidence Act, 1872 - whether joint registrar justified in rejecting pass book of petitioner

Coastal Oil Mills Rep. by Its Managing Partner, M. Bapaiah S/O Ramalin ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 160, 161, 167 and 171

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT551

released in favour of the plaintiff and they were sold in public auction.17. Section 160 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short 'the Act') mandates return of the goods by the bailee to the bailor or deliver according … he is responsible to the bailor for any loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods from that time. Section 167 of the Act deals with right of a third person claiming goods bailed. If a person, other than

Superintendent and Legal Remembrancer, State of West Bengal Vs. Corpor ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections Sections 115, 167(2), 218, 218(1), 512, 537, 541, 541(1), 541(2) and 547A; ;Constitution of India - Articles 25, 32, 136, 226, 298, 300, 372 and 544; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 385(1), 386(1), 421 and 488; Common Law; Constitutional Law; Interpretation Act; Crown Proceedings Act; City of Bombay Municipal Act, 1888 - Sections 212, 222(1), 265, 305, 489 and 491; Indian Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 26 - Schedule - Articles 167 and 178; City of Madras Municipal Act, 1884 - Sections 341; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 110, 208(1) and 225(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections - 74; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(2) and 90; Indian Easements Act - Sections 2; The Crown Grant

Reported in : AIR1967SC997; 1967CriLJ950; [1967]2SCR170

bound unless the contrary is stated. Many Acts like the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Indian Contract Act 1872 make special provisions for the Government in respect of particular matters on the assumption that in respect of … the Bombay High Court held that the Government was bound by Art. 167 of Schedule 11 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1877. Westropp, C.J. said: … for the year 1960-61, the Government of West Bengal did not take out a licence under the said section but carried on the said trade. The main contention of the Government was that the State was not

State of Orissa and ors. Vs. Harapriya Bisoi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3A, 4, 4(1), 4(3), 5, 8, 8(1) and 28; Orissa Survey and Settlement Act, 1958; Orissa Tenancy Act, 1913 - Sections 5(5), 15 and 16; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 107; India Registration Act - Sections 17 and 49; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Orissa Communal Forest and Private Lands (Prohibitions of Alienation) Act, 1948 - Sections 56(1) and 63; Madras General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 8; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 167, 420, 468, 471 and 477A; Orissa Government Business Rules

Reported in : AIR2009SC2991; JT2009(7)SC92; 2009(II)OLR(SC)229; (2009)12SCC378; 2009(7)LC3326(SC):2009AIRSCW48062009(4)LHSC2600

if it was at the material date false in substance and in fact. Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines 'fraud' as act committed by a party to a contract with intent to deceive another. From dictionary

Kailas Sizing Works Vs. Municipality of Bhivandi and Nizampur

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 - Sections 167 and 167A; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(20); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 226; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1969Bom127; (1968)70BOMLR554; ILR1969Bom564; 1968MhLJ916

would naturally not apply to Acts prior to the passing of the said Act, such as the Indian Contract Act or Transfer of Property Act. To these provisions, the definition of 'good faith' as understood generally in civil … reason, for the dismissal of the plaintiffs' suit was that the suit was barred by the provisions of Section 167 of the Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901. Sections 167 and 167A(1) read as under:'167. No suit shall lie

K.S. Satyanarayana Vs. V.R. Narayana Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70 and 72; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Government of India Act, 1935

Reported in : AIR1999SC2544; JT1999(5)SC127; (1999)123PLR297; 1999(4)SCALE286; (1999)6SCC104; [1999]3SCR1213

and the plaintiff would be entitled to restitution. In this connection Sections 70 and 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 may be referred to, which are as under:70. Obligation of person enjoying benefit of non-gratuitous act.- Where a … face of it. Trial Court could have also compared the signatures of the 1st defendant as provided in Section 73 of the Indian Evidence Act. Section 73 is reproduced as under:Comparison of signature, writing or seal with

Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences vs MI 2 C Securities ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

statutes, rules, notification, etc. since long, and is also a part of common law. Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 uses the expression by stating that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, inter alia, … Bench of this Court in Patel Engg. Ltd. v. North Eastern Electric Power Corpn. Ltd., (2020) 7 SCC 167.73. In a recent three-Judge Bench decision of this Court in DMRCLtd. v. Delhi Airport Metro Express (P) Ltd.,

Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited versus Santosh Cordeiro and A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 1

Bom 4176 - referred to.List of Acts Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; Contract Act, 1872. List of Keywords Section 11(6A), Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996; Section 41, Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882;

M/S St. Thomas School vs M/S Megalogix

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

statutes, rules, notification, etc. since long, and is also a part of common law. Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 uses the expression by stating that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, inter alia, … Bench of this Court in Patel Engg. Ltd. v. North Eastern Electric Power Corpn. Ltd., (2020) 7 SCC 167.73. In a recent three-Judge Bench decision of this Court in DMRCLtd. v. Delhi Airport Metro Express (P) Ltd.,