Advanced Search Results

The General Manager, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Banga ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(35), 149(2) and 157; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10

Reported in : 2001ACJ1480; ILR2000KAR718; 2000(3)KarLJ344

Acts/Rules/Orders:Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(35), 149(2) and 157;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 10Case Referred:New India Assurance Company Limited v. H. Siddalinga Naika and Others, AIR 1984 Kant. 228JUDGEMENTMohamed

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Santro Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4 and 30; Contract Act, 1872; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 94, 95, 95(5), 145, 146, 147, 147(1), 147(3), 149, 149(1), 149(2), 155 and 157; Insurance Act, 1938

Reported in : 2009ACJ570; 2009(1)AWC502(SC); 2009(2)MhLJ960(SC); 2008(16)SCALE136:2009AIRSCW6472009(1)LHSC74:2009(1)SCC(Cri)582:2009ACJ570

Even according to law the contract cannot be made in favour of dead person. So under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 the alleged contract of Insurance is not liable to pay any amount of compensation. The respondent No. 1 … be said to have any application in a situation of this nature. We may notice the provisions of Section 157 of the Act in terms whereof in a case of transfer of a motor vehicle, the certificate of

Vimla Devi vs.pushpa Devi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

the general power of attorney reliance is placed by the courts below to Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which provides that the general power of attorney given for consideration is irrevocable. The courts below have also

National Securities Clearing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Prime Broking Compan ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

weeks from today. Companies Act, 1956 , Sections 433, 434, 439;Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Sections 102, 482; Contract Act, 1872, Section 176 - Company Petition Admission of Winding up Petition- Petitioner Company, a statutory body and a subsidiary of … the Court of Appeal in England in the case of Re Portman Provincial Cinemas Ltd (1999 (1) WLR 157).Mr. Andhyarujina submitted that before I reject the claim of the Respondent Company made in the said Suit and

Corporation Bank Vs. Mohandas Baliga

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contract

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 34; Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891 - Sections 4; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 133, 134, 135, 139 and 141

Reported in : ILR1993KAR201; 1993(1)KarLJ308

and 11.1 of the Judgment, therefore, it is necessary to reproduce the same:'9. Chapter VIII of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') deals with indemnity and guarantee. Section 124 defines the expression 'Contract of … defendant is that the Decisions in K.R. CHITGUPPI & CO. v. VINAYAK KASHINATH KHADILKAR ILR 1921 (45) Bombay 157 and STATE BANK OF INDIA v. MACHINE WELL INDUSTRIES AND ORS., 1983 (53) Company Cases 830 have not

Iti Limited Vs. Alphion Corporation

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

term “agreement” is not defined in the Arbitration Act, albeit it is defined in Section 10 of the Contract Act, 1872 (for short “the Contract Act”), [ “10. What agreements are contracts.-All agreements are contracts if they are made … reprehensible.’ In the book on the Indian Contract Act by Pollock and Mulla it is stated at p. 157: ‘The epithet “immoral” points, in legal usage, to conduct or purposes which the State, though disapproving them, is

Shiam Cooperative Group vs.m/s. Kamal Construction Co. Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 ATC103 wherein the applicability of the expression ‗public policy‘ on the touchstone of Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 and Article 14 of the Constitution of India came to be considered. This Court therein was dealing with … reprehensible.‘ In the book on the Indian Contract Act by Pollock and Mulla it is stated at p. 157: ‗The epithet ―immoral‖ points, in legal usage, to conduct or purposes which the State, though disapproving them, is

Anuja Sharma vs.memo Devi & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the agreement to sell has to be forfeited by applying the provision of Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.7. It is settled law that unless a seller proves a loss being caused to him on account

Mahendrakumar Chandulal Vs. Central Bank of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1984)1GLR237

the bill of lading from liability for the negligence of its servants notwithstanding Section 151 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This is also a Division Bench judgment wherein on the point under consideration, it has been observed as … to the express provisions of the Act: see Chilguppi & Co. v. Vinayak Kashinath (1920) ILR 45 Bom. 157 S.C. 22 Bom. L.R. 659.The group of sections in the Indian Contract Act dealing with bailment commence with

M/S. Ssa Constructions vs Andra Bank

Court : Karnataka

caused prejudice to the respondents.31. It is now pertinent that we advert to the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which govern the liability of the principal debtor and co-sureties to the creditor.32. Section 44 of the Act … to disclose the fact that the principal debtor is already overdrawn.50. In Behan v. Obelon Proprietary Ltd. [(1984-85) 157 CLR 326], the Australian High Court held that a creditor does not have to disclose one surety’s financial