Advanced Search Results
Surendra Kumar Rai Vs. Zilla Parishad, Jhansi and Others
Allahabad
Apr-01-1997
Commercial
Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Samities and Zilla Parishads Act, 1961 - Sections 119, 120(3), 121, 123, 142 to 145, 146, 148, 148(1), 152(2), 153, 153(3), 158(2) and 159; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 14, 16 and 65; Constitution of India - Articles 299; Uttar Pradesh Zilla Prashiads (Recovery of Arrears of Tax and Rent on Land) Rules, 1975; Uttar Pradesh Town Areas Act, 1940; Northern India Ferries Act, 1878
AIR1997All387; (1997)2UPLBEC1106
contract was void. Reliance has been place for this submission on Sections 10, 14 and 16 of the Contract Act. learned counsel has further submitted that in any case the unpaid amount of the contract money cannot be … licence fee upon the commencement of the period in respect of which such tax or fee is payable. Section 153 provides that it shall be lawful for the officer mentioned in Section 152 to distrain. wherever it may
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Ram Patti Devi and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue, U.P., Allahabad and ...
Allahabad
Nov-29-1972
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Tenants (Acquisition of Privileges) Act, 1949 - Sections 3, 3B and 3C; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 153; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 21
AIR1973All288
in disputed land - notwithstanding that other cotenant has acquired bhumidari rights. (iii) Alienation - Section 21 of Contract Act, 1872 - alienation of a certain interest in the land - not allowed in law - held, alienation not … land in dispute and could not transfer the same by sale in view of the prohibition contained in Section 153 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, according to which sirdari interest is not transferable.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Indian Bank, Madras Vs. S. Krishnaswamy and Others
Chennai
Feb-15-1989
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 133, 134, 136, 139, 140, 141, 143, 153 and 171; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 8, Rule 6
AIR1990Mad115
the appeals with costs.17. Appeals dismissed. Contract - liability of surety - Sections 62 and 153 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 - parties to contract agree to substitute new contract for old contract - consent of surety not obtained … can be shown that A is solely entitled to the amount standing in name of A and B. Section 171 of the Contract Act deals with general Hen of bankers, factors, wharfingers, attorneys and policy-brokers and it
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
HDFC Bank Ltd. Vs. Rohan Dyes and Intermediates Ltd.
Mumbai
Jul-19-2016
Land Acquisition
any, shall be refunded to the Petitioner. Companies Act, 1956, Sections 434(1)(a), 439;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section138; Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 30; Gaming Act, 1845 (U.K), Section 18- Company Petition- Leave for Winding up- Petitioner Bank, an authorised dealer … Chandrachud J. as he then was) in the case of E-City Media P.Ltd. v/s Sadhrta Retail Ltd. ([2010] 153 Comp Cas 326 (Bom). 22. On carefully considering the arguments of Mr Cama, I am unable to accept
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Securities Clearing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Prime Broking Compan ...
Mumbai
Jun-28-2016
Land Acquisition
weeks from today. Companies Act, 1956 , Sections 433, 434, 439;Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Sections 102, 482; Contract Act, 1872, Section 176 - Company Petition Admission of Winding up Petition- Petitioner Company, a statutory body and a subsidiary of … Mr. Tulzapurkar relied upon the following two judgments: (a) ICICI Bank Ltd v/s Sundaram Multi Pap Ltd. (2010) 153 Comp Cas 424 (Bom)(paragraphs 5 and 8) (b) Union of India v/s Raman Iron Foundry (1974) 2 SCC
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shanti Devi Sharma and anr. Vs. Radheshyam Palod and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-14-2000
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Kerosene Dealers Licensing Order, 1979; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Suits Valuation Act; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7 and 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 and 153 - Order 1, Rules 9 and 10(1) - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 30, Rules 1, 2 and 4 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145
2000(3)MPHT451; 2000(2)MPLJ331
reads:'4. Right of suit on death of partner.-- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 45 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), where two or more persons may sue or be sued in the name of a … being sued in their individual names. In the circumstances, the Civil Court could permit, under the provisions of Section 153 of the Code an amendment of the plaint to enable a proper description of the plaintiffs to appear
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahant Singh Vs. U Ba Yi
Mumbai
Mar-03-1939
Contract
(1939)41BOMLR742
A.L.R. Lah. 396, approved.;Ranjit Singh v. Naubat (1902) I.L.R. 24 All. 504, disapproved.;Under Section 2(j) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which says that a contract which ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to … 7 C.P. 9 and Oriental Financial Corporation v. Overend, Gurney, & Co. (1871) L.R. 7 Ch. App. 142, 15314. Similarly, a failure to sue the principal debtor until recovery is barred by the statute of limitations does
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChief Executive Officer And Vice Chairman Gujarat Maritime Board Vs. A ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-24-2020
Land Acquisition
was imperative that breach of such contract should have been proved. Sections 64 and 65 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter the „Contract Act‟), contemplate return of benefit for a void/voidable contract. It was submitted that these provisions … any benefit received under the contract, it was imperative that breach of such contract should have been proved. Sections 64 and 65 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter the „Contract Act‟), contemplate return of benefit for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLift and Shift India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Warehousing Corporation
Delhi
Mar-06-2017
Land Acquisition
compensation for loss of profit. (xiii) The doctrine of frustration of contract under Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 („ICA‟) would apply only when the entire contract becomes incapable of performance and not only part of it.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLacoste vs Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. & Anr.
Delhi
Mar-09-2026
Intellectual Property
to be <clear, specific, and mutually acknowledged= to be binding by relying on Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to contend that the letter dated 10.02.1989 (Ex. DW 1/24), even if considered a unilateral proposal, was accepted … Investment Corpn. v. Diamond & Gem Development Corporation Ltd., (2013) 5 SCC 470 : (2013) 3 SCC (Civ) 153; Shree Ambica Medical Stores v. Surat People's Coop. Bank Ltd., (2020) 13 SCC 564 21 GMR Warora Energy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »