Advanced Search Results

Percept D'Markr (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Companies Act, 1956; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 36; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(1), 41 and 42; Arbitration and Conciliation Rules

Reported in : AIR2006SC3426; 2006(2)ARBLR34(SC); 2006(2)AWC1869(SC); 2006(5)BomCR322; (2006)5CompLJ224(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ100(SC); (2006)4MLJ1695; 2006(3)SCALE324; (2006)4SCC227

Pvt. Ltd. and the respondent No. 1 - Zaheer Khan is void under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 has been in restraint of trade. It was submitted by learned senior counsel for the appellant - Mr. … application.24. Learned senior counsel for respondent No. 1 submitted that the agreement may not be specifically enforced under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and accordingly, under Section 41(e), no injunction could be granted as prayed

Mohar Singh Vs. Deen Dayal Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)704; 65(1997)DLT1; 2003(39)DRJ760

the of Section '14, he shall be punishable with fine which may extend to one thousands rupees. xxxxxxxxxxxxx Contract Act, 1872 23. What consideration and objects are lawful, and what not The consideration or object of an agreement is

S. Ananda and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Pension Rules - Rule 44; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 14(5), 20 and 22; Madras State Subordinate Service General Rules - Rule 9; Punjab Municipal Act - Sections 236

Reported in : (1983)IILLJ277Mad

in G.O.Ms. No. 731, Industries, dated 21.5.1974 is void and unenforceable as per Section 20 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 because it has been passed by a mistake and is not based on free consent, as per section … because it has been passed by a mistake and is not based on free consent, as per section 14(5) of the said Act for since the terminal benefits offered in the said G.O. can normally be claimed

Petlad Bulakhidas Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 14, 15 and 72

Reported in : AIR1970Guj59; (1970)0GLR330

1961 is dismissed with costs.26. Order accordingly. Contract - agreement - Sections 14, 15 and 72 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 - second appeal against Order of District Judge allowing appeal of respondent - as per general clause of … and ordinary sense. The definition in Section 15 is expressly inserted for the special object of applying to Section 14, i.e., to define what is the criterion whether an agreement was made by means of a consent extorted

The Secretary of State for India Vs. Bhaskar Krishnaji Samant

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1925Bom485; (1925)27BOMLR973

in case of a breach of the conditions thereof may, notwithstanding anything in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, be recovered from him in case of such breach as if it were an arrear of land-revenue.16. It … therein. The section did not exist in Act VII of 1878 as originally framed. It was added by Section 14 of Act V of 1890, based on Section 25 of the Opium Act I of 1875. Vide the

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Polo Singh and Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 14, 17, 29, 30 and 33; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 74

Reported in : 2003(1)ARBLR270(Delhi); 101(2002)DLT401; 2003(66)DRJ132

was a claim of remote nature, which was not permissible under Section 73 & 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. It was contended that after undertaking the construction work respondent/claimant would not have necessarily earned profits. The learned … lacs (Approx.) on account of defamation.9. All these counter-claims were, however, disallowed by the arbitrator.10. An application under Section 14, 17 & 29 of the Arbitration Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was filed on behalf of

Shikha Misra and anr Vs. S. Krishnamurthy

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the valuer makes it certain and enforceable; (iii) on illustration (e) of Section 29 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 providing that an Agreement to Sell of rice at a price to be fixed by a third person … governed by the Contract Act, is also regulated by the Specific Relief Act, 1963. A perusal of Section 14(1)(b) thereof shows that contracts, specific performance of material terms of which the Court cannot enforce, are not specifically

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

the Arbitration Act, along with a restraint on judicial intervention. [Para 56(II)] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Contract Act, 1872 - s.23 - Statutory incorporation of duties of the parties to the arbitration agreement: Held: [Per Pamidighantam Sri … the applicability of the provision by an express agreement in writing after the dispute has arisen; and d. Section 14 allows parties to mutually terminate the mandate of an arbitrator. 25. Additionally, the parties are free to agree

Shri Baij Nath Vs. M/S. Ansal and Saigal Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 14; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1

Reported in : ILR1992Delhi1057

alleged contract between the parties is not specifically enforceable in view of clauses (b), (c) and (d) of Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act ? 6. What were the terms of the alleged contract between the parties, … was fulfillled the contract was not capable of specific enforcement as stated in Section 31 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.7. So far as the submission that at least the contract may be specifically enforced qua 192 sq. ft.

M.M. HussaIn and Others Vs. Laminated Package (P) Ltd., Madras and Oth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractCompany

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 125 and 318; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Constitution of India - Article 31

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD248; 1999(6)ALT529

appeal is accordingly allowed with costs throughout. (i) Contract - payment of consideration - Section 2 (d) of Contract Act, 1872 - surrender of rights of plaintiffs in company by agreement - mode of payment of consideration to plaintiffs … for the respondents, submitted that the suit seeking for enforcement of contract of personal service is hit by Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act and hence the suit is not maintainable. He further contended that Ex.A33 has