Advanced Search Results

K.Paramasivam Vs. G.Lakshminarayanan.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Indian Limitation Act - Section 18, Article 54; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 25; Transfer of Property Act - Section 4; Registration Act ; Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Order 8 Rule 5; Specific Relief Act - Section 16(c), 20

learned senior counsel for the plaintiff inviting the attention of this court to Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which is extracted here under for ready reference :25. Agreement without consideration, void, unless it is in writing … relating to contracts to be taken as part of Contract Act and supplemental to the Registration Act   The Chapters and sections of this Act which relate to contracts shall be taken as part of the Indian Contract … effect from 16.06.1994 onwards and the last such endorsement was made on 06.04.2006 extending three more months' period for performance. Even thereafter, the defendant had

M/S Versatile Commotrade Private Limited vs.smt Kesar Devi and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

act in CS(OS) 143/2018 Page 8 of 18 which the public are interested.” 33. Section 74 occurs in Chapter 6 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which reads "Of the consequences of breach of contract". It is … to Sell would have to be analyzed and determined as per Section 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The law on this subject has been settled by the Constitution Bench decision of the Supreme Court in

Andritz Oy, Rep. Through Power of Attorney Agent, Mr. Siraj Ahmad Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ArbitrationCompany

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1), 7, 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 7(4), 7(5), 8, 11(6), 16, 16(1), 44 to 52, 53 and 54 - Schedule - Article 11(2) and 11(3); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(35), 3, 3(1), 26, 28, 31, 36, 39, 40, 79 and 82; Transfer of Property Act; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 7, 8(2) and 47(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 19, 19A, 20, 23 to 30, 35, 36 and 56; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 7, Rule 14(1); United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 1985; United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Conciliation Rules, 1980; Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce Rules

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR545(Madras)

would perish along with the main contract, we may have to take recourse to the provisions of the Contract Act, 1872.38. The Contract Act, 1872, among other things, deals with--(1) valid and enforceable contracts; (2) voidable contracts; (3) contracts … clause part of the contract.Section 44, dealing with the definition of 'foreign award', reads as follows:44. Definition--In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, 'foreign award' means an arbitral award on differences between persons arising out of … in accordance with the provisions contained in the joint venture agreement dated 06.12.1995.2. I have heard Mr. A.L. Somayaji, learned senior counsel appearing for the

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Bhupen Champaklal Dalal and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

contract had been entered into and acts done by him as the principal in person under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The legal effect of the acts of his business as the broker of the 5th to the 17th … of the period between 20.03.1991 to 08.04.1992. 26. The investment policy of the Reserve Bank of India in chapter 11 of the Instructions of the Reserve Bank of India for banks and banking operations relating to ready … no documents showing repayment except two DDs of Bank of Karad dated 06.08.1991 in favour of BMC Bank for Rs.10.26 Cr. And 12.93 Cr. Both

The Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. rep. by its Vi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

seller of his obligation to supply; a parallel could be drawn therefrom to Section 54 of the Indian Contract Act 1872; the only ground on which the plaintiff can be refused to be heard, on the question of the … Mine Safety directed that normal mine operations should not be resumed unless the orders were vacated in writing. Chapter-XI of the Regulations relates to mine workings. Regulation 106 therein, which relates to open-cast workings, stipulates that, in … Director of Mines Safety dated 30.08.1993. By their letter in Ex.A-55 dated 06.12.1993, the plaintiff informed the defendant-corporation that they had carried out the work

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ganguly, the Supreme Court was concerned with the interpretation of ‘public policy’ under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.19 In this context, this Court observed: “It is thus clear that the principles governing public policy must … The JJ Act was enacted to consolidate and amend the law catering to the basic needs of children. Chapter VIII (Sections 56 to73) deals with the provisions relating to adoption. Section 2(49) of the JJ Act defines … (CIVIL) NO(S). 260 OF2023TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 05 OF2023TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 06 OF20232 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 319 OF2023TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 07 OF2023TRANSFERRED

Tommorrowland Limited vs Real Growth Financial Services Ltd Now Rgf Ca ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

also been rightly affirmed that the learned Arbitrator had properly applied Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 11 to determine reasonable compensation. The Award was neither held to be perverse nor vitiated by legal misconduct. … as the legal relationship between Tommorrowland and the Underwriter is not merely contractual but is statutorily regulated under Chapter VIII of the IC Act. For the sake of ready and convenient reference, some of the relevant statutory … issued letters offering them the option to withdraw. The SEBI letter dated 06.03.1995 triggered the under- subscription, due to Tommorrowland‘s fraudulent and 189 (2012) DLT

Tommorrowland Limited vs Essar Capital Ltd. Now Known as Vajresh Consu ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

also been rightly affirmed that the learned Arbitrator had properly applied Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 11 to determine reasonable compensation. The Award was neither held to be perverse nor vitiated by legal misconduct. … as the legal relationship between Tommorrowland and the Underwriter is not merely contractual but is statutorily regulated under Chapter VIII of the IC Act. For the sake of ready and convenient reference, some of the relevant statutory … issued letters offering them the option to withdraw. The SEBI letter dated 06.03.1995 triggered the under- subscription, due to Tommorrowland‘s fraudulent and 189 (2012) DLT

Tommorrowland Limited vs Pressman Advertising Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

also been rightly affirmed that the learned Arbitrator had properly applied Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 11 to determine reasonable compensation. The Award was neither held to be perverse nor vitiated by legal misconduct. … as the legal relationship between Tommorrowland and the Underwriter is not merely contractual but is statutorily regulated under Chapter VIII of the IC Act. For the sake of ready and convenient reference, some of the relevant statutory … issued letters offering them the option to withdraw. The SEBI letter dated 06.03.1995 triggered the under- subscription, due to Tommorrowland‘s fraudulent and 189 (2012) DLT

Tommorrowland Limited vs Hemdev Securities India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

also been rightly affirmed that the learned Arbitrator had properly applied Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 11 to determine reasonable compensation. The Award was neither held to be perverse nor vitiated by legal misconduct. … as the legal relationship between Tommorrowland and the Underwriter is not merely contractual but is statutorily regulated under Chapter VIII of the IC Act. For the sake of ready and convenient reference, some of the relevant statutory … issued letters offering them the option to withdraw. The SEBI letter dated 06.03.1995 triggered the under- subscription, due to Tommorrowland‘s fraudulent and 189 (2012) DLT