Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: contingency fund act 1957 section 3 · Page 1 of about 645 results (0.088 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 16 1975

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Bombay Vs. Bombay Suburban Electric Supply ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-16-1975

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(1); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 27; Electricity Act - Sections 7, 7A and 7A(2); Electricity (Supply) Act

Reported in : [1976]103ITR384(Bom)

shows such asset as assets of company - capital reserve to be treated as assets of company. (ii) Contingency fund - Sections 2(m) and 3 of Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - assessee entitled to make payments out of … may be.' 8. The argument of Mr. Joshi, on behalf of the revenue, is that under the charging section 3 of the Act wealth-tax is to be charged as a tax in respect of the net wealth on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1993

V. Gokulkrishna Vs. M.C. Nanaiah

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-13-1993

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 74(2), 163(3), 226 and 267(2); Evidence Act - Sections 123

Reported in : ILR1993KAR1615; 1993(2)KarLJ259

Legislature, of the amounts expended which were not specifically authorised earlier under the relevant Appropriation Act.20. The Karnataka Contingency Fund Act, 1957 (the Karnataka Act No. 11 of 1957) was enacted under Article 267(2). Section 2 provides for the establishment … basis that the Appropriation Act was duly passed by both the Houses of Legislature; the learned Single Judge observed;"Section 3 thereof (The Appropriation (No. 3) Act, 1992) provided that sums authorised to be paid and applied from and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1981

Satish Chandra Khandelwal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-06-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 490(1)

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi1; ILR1981Delhi917

the recommendations of the Morarka Commission in para 4.10(d) of volume-6 of its report that the practice of contingency fund should be discontinued and that instead the Councillors should draw up proposals for improvements and new works in … order of the Central Government dated April 11, 1980, made under section 490(i) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (the Act)' the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (the Corporation) was superseded. As a result all the 100 councillors … all the powers and duties of a local authority. To it is entrusted the municipal government of Delhi'. Section 3 of the Act establishes the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. The Corporation is a body corporate having perpetual succession

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 18 1962

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Gujarat Vs. Raipur Manufacturing Company L ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-18-1962

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 7, 7(1), 7(2), 14, 27(1) and 46; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18A and 23B

Reported in : (1963)0GLR741

it is necessary to examine some of the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The charging section is section 3. That section runs as unde : '3. Charge of Wealth-tax. - Subject to the other provisions contained in … Swinfen Eady in dealing with the matter observed that there was no contingency which could happen to deprive the doctor of his right to payment … block at Rs. 86,29,439. As against this amount there was a depreciation fund amounting to Rs. 60,39,993. The Companies Act, 1956, came into force on … K.T. Desai, C.J.1. This reference under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, raises some interesting and important questions relating to the construction of section 2(m) and section 7of the Wealth-tax

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1973

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Gujarat Ii Vs. Arvind Narottam

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-01-1973

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1B); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(4) and 41(1)

Reported in : [1976]102ITR232(Guj)

- Section 2 (1B) of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Sections 3, 21 and 41 of Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - assessment Orders by which assessee assessed for entire value of assets held by trustees of trusts created … which they like, it cannot be said that the share of the assessee was indeterminate or unknown. The contingency of his marriage and children and consequently under the relevant clauses the trustees having a discretion to be … case, the assessee having contingent interest in the corpus of the trust fund, the Tribunal was in error in rejecting the contention of the revenue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1962

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Raipur Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-16-1962

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 4(3), 6, 7, 7(1) and 7(2); Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 4, 18A, 18A(1), 18A(2), 23B and 67B; Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 - Rule 4; Finance Act

Reported in : AIR1964Guj154; [1964]52ITR482(Guj)

is necessary to examine some of the provisions of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The charging Section is Section 3. That Section runs as under:- '3. Charge of Wealth-tax:- Subject to the other provisions contained in this Act … Swinien Eady in dealing with the matter observed that there was no contingency which could happen to deprive the doctor of his right to payment … block at Rs. 86,29,439/-. As against this amount there was a depreciation fund amounting to Rs. 60,39,883/-. The Companies Act, 1956, came into force on … K.T. Desai, C.J.1. This Reference under Section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, raises some interesting and important questions relating to the construction of Section 2(m) and Section 7 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1977

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Bombay City-i, Bombay Vs. Andhra Valley Po ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-01-1977

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(1), 27(1) and 45

Reported in : [1978]114ITR783(Bom)

in computing the net wealth of the company, the amounts in the contingency reserve, development reserve and tariffs and dividends control reserve are liable to … such time as the company may think of utilising the consumers benefit fund is lesser at that particular time. But this is not the same … proposed in the Finance Bill which incidentally even in that case happened to be the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1957, or the rate in force in the preceding year, whichever was more favourable to the assessee. In the … the wealth-tax Act is entirely different from the subject of the charge under the Income-tax Act. While under section 3, tax is levied in respect of the net wealth on the corresponding valuation date, under the provisions of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1977

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. Trustees ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-1977

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth-tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 21 and 21(4); Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 41 and 41(2); Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 161 and 161 (2)

Reported in : AIR1977SC2103; [1977]108ITR555(SC); (1977)3SCC362; [1977]3SCR735

and complexity and they turn on the true interpretation of Sections 3 and 21 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 but since they can be answered only by applying the correct interpretation to the facts of the case, … various beneficiaries specified In Part X of the Second Schedule and every contingency was taken care of in laying down the mode of devolution, so … divided into 175 equal units, out of which five units constituted a Fund called the 'Reserve Fund', 31/2 units constituted a 'Family Trust Expenses Fund' … Appellate Assistant Commissioner should have 'given a definite finding regarding the applicability of Section 21, Sub-section (4) or Section 3 to the facts of the case.' The argument of the Revenue in regard to this contention was that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2006

Rajashree Cement, a Unit of Grasim Industries Limited, by Its Deputy G ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

Subject : ElectricityConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 4 and 8; Mysore Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) Act, 1950; Mysore Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) Amendment Act, 1957; States Reorganization Act; commencement of Karnataka Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) (Amendment) Act, 2004; Parent Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Karnataka Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) Rules - Rules 3, 3(2) and 10; Karnataka Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ400

is one in the context of augmenting the revenue of the State, which ultimately forms part of the contingency fund of the State, the levy is one which subserves the object of a fiscal statute like the present … objects and reasons to the principal Act i.e. Act No. 14 of 1957, and submit that the very object of the principal Act was to … is known as electricity tax under the provisions of the Karnataka Ordinance No. 8 of 2003, which amended Section 3 of the Karnataka Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) Act, 1959 [for short 'the Act'] and levied a tax burden

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2000

J. Alexander Vs. Central Bureau of Investigatin, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-09-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(1), 155(2), 226, 227, 228, 239, 240 and 482; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and (2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-A , B, 419, 420 and 477-A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 267(2); Karnataka Contingency Fund Act, 1957; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and (2)

Reported in : ILR2000KAR1418; 2000(3)KarLJ628

money to accused 3 was violative of Article 267(2) of the Constitution and the provisions of the Karnataka Contingency Fund Act, 1957, and, accordingly, this Court quashed the Government Order for the supply of the computers offered by accused 3 … of charges against the petitioner (accused 1) in Special C.C. No. 134 of 1994 for the offences under Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial