Advanced Search Results

Shanthiniketan Housing Foundation (A) Registered Partnership Firm) Rep ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 25, 27, 27A, 27(1), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 37(1), 40 and 40(1); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(1) and 21; Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4, 6, 173, 200(1), 200(2), 207, 227, 238 to 240, 242, 248, 251 to 258, 260, 262, 262(2), 263, 264, 265, 289, 325, 360 and 494; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1892 - Sections 349 and 562; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1872 - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2589; 2009(6)KarLJ205

Matched in: Parties Shanthiniketan Housing Foundation (A) Registered Partnership Firm) Rep. by Its Partner Sri Anil Kumar Seth and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Brig (Retd.) J.N. Devaiah S/O Late Sri N.N. Devaiah, Smt. Dotty Devaiah W/O Brig. J.N. Devaiah, the State of Karnataka Department of Home Represented by Its Secretary and Union of India (Uoi) Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Represented by Its Secretary and ors. Etc. Etc.

Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation Ltd. Vs. Ministry of Information ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

or entering into distribution platforms like cable services and, ultimately, granted permission to the petitioner as per the second amendment rules 2006 as an MSO and, in that regard, a reference was sent to TRAI on 27.12.2007; upon the amendment … of the petitioner with the first respondent, the petitioner is entitled for protection. The learned Advocate General, by also pointing out the stand of the … multi-system operator to the registering authority in Form 6. (2) Every application under sub-rule (1) shall be … and digitisation is to be implemented immediately and further informing all MSOs and local Cable TV operators and consumers that, in case digitisation is not done, cable TV connections would be switched off any time. Apprehending that … whose members are citizens of India; (iii) a company as defined in section 3 of the Companies Act,1956 (1 of 1956)". ".4-A.- Transmission of programmes

The Tabocco Institute of India Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

non misleading speech about a lawful product. Also the ban did not result in an end unrelated to consumer protection. According to one commentator, “the entire commercial speech doctrine, after all, represents an accommodation between the right to … Specific rules have been framed for the implementation of the prohibitions as well as the restrictions. The impugned Amendment Rules, 2014 is in the context of packaging and labelling cigarettes and other tobacco products. The said Rules have … inter alia, about specified warnings.120. In the year 2006, the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and … cigarette and other tobacco products to a person below the age of eighteen years and in particular areas (Section 6). Four kinds of 405 activities namely, production, supply, distribution and trade including import of cigarettes and other tobacco … Rules is exclusively allocated to the Department of Health and Family Welfare. Secondly, it would be useful to reiterate that on the enforcement of COTPA,

All India Digital Cable Federation vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of ...

Court : Kerala

Price (MRP) of television channels charged from the customer by way of Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection (Second Amendment) Regulation, 2006. The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘TDSAT’), on 27.02.2007, in the … Services Interconnection (Addressable Systems) Regulation 2017; (2) Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Standards of Quality of Services and Consumer Protection (Addressable Systems) Regulations 2017; and (3) Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2017. [hereinafter … association, were heard exercising the powers conferred under Rule 152 of the Rules of the High Court of Kerala, 1971, and perused the pleadings and … 193/2023 : 25 :contended that TRAI is a statutory body established under Section 3 of the Act, 1997, which was promulgated to establish TRAI, to … COA BHAVAN, THOUNDAYIL ROAD, PANAMPILLY NAGAR ERNAKULAM - 682 036, KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.

Cellular Operators Association of India and Ors. Vs. Telecom Regulator ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (C) the dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in … also provided for financial disincentives in case there is a failure to meet this parameter by enacting a second amendment to the Quality of Service Regulations dated 8.11.2012 by which a service provider is liable to pay, by … broad heads - excess charging and inconvenience caused to them. In paragraphs 6 and 7, the arguments of service providers have been noted, in which … Authority may, by notification, make regulations consistent with this Act and the rules made thereunder to carry out the purposes of this Act. (2) In

National Insurance Company Limited Vs. M/S. Mrh Associates and Another

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Set Discovery P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2, 2(1), 8(1), 8(4), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 12(4), 13, 14, 28, 29, 34, 35, 36 and 37; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 7B(I); Telecom Regulatory Appellate Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 14; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 5(1); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; CTN Act; CTN Rules; Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulations, 2004 - Regulations 3.2, 4, 4.1 and 4.2; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 19(1); Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Service) Interconnection (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2006; Telecom Regulatory Authority of I

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi159; 151(2008)DLT531; 2008(104)DRJ590

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; 68 of 1986(C) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in Sub-section (I) … 9 to 12 of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Service) Interconnection (Third Amendment) Regulation, 2006 (10 of 2006) dated 4.9.2006 (No. 6-4/2006-B&CS;) as amended by … such person shall be punishable with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees and in case of second or subsequent offence with fine which may extend to two lakh rupees and in the case of continuing … shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under this Act or the rules or regulations made thereunder, save on a complaint made by the Authority.(2)

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Af ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Department of Food and Public Distribution, Government of India and Others

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; (c) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in sub-section (1) of section … recommendations are received from the Authority within the period specified in the second proviso or within such period as may be mutually agreed upon between … playing field between the service providers granted licenses before and after the amendment of the TRAI Act?.5. Whether the appeals are maintainable in the present … Appeal No.6049 of 2005 Civil Appeal No.802 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.2731 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.2794 … under sub-section (5) of section 5; (b) the powers and functions of the Chairperson under subsection (1) of section 6; (c) the procedure for conducting an inquiry made under subsection (2) of section 7; (d) the category of … as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The Central government may, by notification, make

Wyeth Vs. Levine

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Congress’ purposes is to the contrary. Building on its 1906 Act, Congress enacted the FDCA to bolster consumer protection against harmful products. See Kordel v. United States , 335 U. S. 345 , 349 (1948); United States … for her nausea. Because the combination did not provide relief, she returned later that day and received a second injection of both drugs. This time, the physician assistant administered the drugs by the IV-push method, and Phenergan … by Congress but on the preamble to a 2006 FDA regulation declaring that state-law failure-to-warn claims threaten … prove harm to keep a drug out of the market, but the amendments required the manufacturer to demonstrate that its drug was “safe for use … a third supplemental application in 1981 in response to a new FDA rule governing drug labels. Over the next 17 years, Wyeth and the FDA … requirements, including subpart B of part 201 and sections 314.70 and 601.12 of title 21, Code of … warning about the IV-push method of administration. Pp. 6-25. (a) The argument that Levine’s state-law claims are