Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: consumer protection second amendment rules 2006 section 2 · Page 1 of about 390 results (0.054 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 07 2017

Emaar Mgf Land Ltd & Anr vs.tanu Batra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-07-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1996, as amended by Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 mandates the consumer forum constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to refer the parties to arbitration in terms of a valid arbitration agreement notwithstanding other provisions … Section 50. It may be mentioned here that Section 50 finds place in the first chapter of the second part of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and relates primarily to the enforcement of Foreign Awards (New … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:7. h November, 2017 + FAO3952017 & CM No.37063-37064/2017 EMAAR MGF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2017

Emaar Mgf Land Ltd & Anr vs.aftab Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-07-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1996, as amended by Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 mandates the consumer forum constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to refer the parties to arbitration in terms of a valid arbitration agreement notwithstanding other provisions … Section 50. It may be mentioned here that Section 50 finds place in the first chapter of the second part of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and relates primarily to the enforcement of Foreign Awards (New … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:7. h November, 2017 + FAO3952017 & CM No.37063-37064/2017 EMAAR MGF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2013

Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation Ltd. Vs. Ministry of Information ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-20-2013

Subject : Service Tax

or entering into distribution platforms like cable services and, ultimately, granted permission to the petitioner as per the second amendment rules 2006 as an MSO and, in that regard, a reference was sent to TRAI on 27.12.2007; upon the amendment … of the petitioner with the first respondent, the petitioner is entitled for protection. The learned Advocate General, by also pointing out the stand of the … and digitisation is to be implemented immediately and further informing all MSOs and local Cable TV operators and consumers that, in case digitisation is not done, cable TV connections would be switched off any time. Apprehending that … whose members are citizens of India; (iii) a company as defined in section 3 of the Companies Act,1956 (1 of 1956)". ".4-A.- Transmission of programmes … 12/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.P.No.34213 of 2013 TAMIL NADU ARASU CABLE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 15 2017

The Tabocco Institute of India Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-15-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

non misleading speech about a lawful product. Also the ban did not result in an end unrelated to consumer protection. According to one commentator, “the entire commercial speech doctrine, after all, represents an accommodation between the right to … Specific rules have been framed for the implementation of the prohibitions as well as the restrictions. The impugned Amendment Rules, 2014 is in the context of packaging and labelling cigarettes and other tobacco products. The said Rules have … inter alia, about specified warnings.120. In the year 2006, the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and … Constitution of India. The Act also prescribes for specified warning as per the Rules made under the Act. Section 2 of the Act expressly declares that the Union i.e., the Central Government has taken under its control tobacco … Rules is exclusively allocated to the Department of Health and Family Welfare. Secondly, it would be useful to reiterate that on the enforcement of COTPA,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2023

All India Digital Cable Federation vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-04-2023

Services Interconnection (Addressable Systems) Regulation 2017; (2) Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Standards of Quality of Services and Consumer Protection (Addressable Systems) Regulations 2017; and (3) Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2017. [hereinafter … Price (MRP) of television channels charged from the customer by way of Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection (Second Amendment) Regulation, 2006. The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘TDSAT’), on 27.02.2007, in the … association, were heard exercising the powers conferred under Rule 152 of the Rules of the High Court of Kerala, 1971, and perused the pleadings and … services and cable services.W.P.(C) No. 193/2023 : 26 :45. It is further contended that consequent to theintroduction of Section 2(1)(k) into the Act, 1997, the entire provisions of the Act, 1997, including all its recommendatory, regulatory and tariff

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2014

National Insurance Company Limited Vs. M/S. Mrh Associates and Another

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Decided on : Apr-01-2014

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2014

Dr. D.J. De Souza Vs. Cadila Health Care Ltd.

Court : Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panaji

Decided on : Feb-25-2014

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panaji

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2011

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Af ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-29-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Department of Food and Public Distribution, Government of India and Others

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2013

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2013

Subject : Service Tax

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; (c) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in sub-section (1) of section … recommendations are received from the Authority within the period specified in the second proviso or within such period as may be mutually agreed upon between … playing field between the service providers granted licenses before and after the amendment of the TRAI Act?.5. Whether the appeals are maintainable in the present … Appeal No.6049 of 2005 Civil Appeal No.802 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.2731 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.2794 … may consider necessary.14. Authority to settle disputes-(1) If a dispute arises, in respect of matters referred to in sub-section (2), among service providers or between service providers and a group of consumers, such disputes shall be adjudicated by … as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The Central government may, by notification, make

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2009

Shanthiniketan Housing Foundation (A) Registered Partnership Firm) Rep ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-19-2009

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 25, 27, 27A, 27(1), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 37(1), 40 and 40(1); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(1) and 21; Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4, 6, 173, 200(1), 200(2), 207, 227, 238 to 240, 242, 248, 251 to 258, 260, 262, 262(2), 263, 264, 265, 289, 325, 360 and 494; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1892 - Sections 349 and 562; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1872 - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2589; 2009(6)KarLJ205

Matched in: Parties Shanthiniketan Housing Foundation (A) Registered Partnership Firm) Rep. by Its Partner Sri Anil Kumar Seth and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Brig (Retd.) J.N. Devaiah S/O Late Sri N.N. Devaiah, Smt. Dotty Devaiah W/O Brig. J.N. Devaiah, the State of Karnataka Department of Home Represented by Its Secretary and Union of India (Uoi) Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Represented by Its Secretary and ors. Etc. Etc.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial