Advanced Search Results

Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Represented ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

seeking for a Writ of Declaration, declaring the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Unscheduled Interchange Charges and Related Matters) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012, contained in Notification No.1(1)/2011-CERC, dated 5.3.2012, as arbitrary, unreasonable and ultra vires the Constitution of India … relevant market, in accordance with the principles of competition, fair participation, as well as the protection of the consumers’ interests. However, the CERC while exercising such powers, would have to take into consideration certain factual aspects before … notification, dated 26.6.2010, had notified the Central Electricity Authority (Grid Standards) Regulations, 2006, under sub Section 3 of Section 177 of the Electricity Act, 2003, … enhancement of power cuts, from 10 hours to 14 hours, without taking into consideration the relevant factors. … with the power to make regulations consistent with the Act and the Rules. In order to give effect to the provisions of the Act, in

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; (c) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in sub-section (1) of section … recommendations are received from the Authority within the period specified in the second proviso or within such period as may be mutually agreed upon between … playing field between the service providers granted licenses before and after the amendment of the TRAI Act?.5. Whether the appeals are maintainable in the present … Appeal No.6049 of 2005 Civil Appeal No.802 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.2731 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.2794 … as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The Central government may, by notification, make … decided to hear the arguments on the following question:“Whether in exercise of the power vested in it under Section 14(b) of the Act, TDSAT has the jurisdiction to entertain challenge to the regulations framed by the Authority under

Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

or regulation shall have effect in so far as it is inconsistent with any other provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act or the Railways Act, 1989. In other words, Section 173 specifically … the provisions which are inconsistent with provisions of the Act and the second being those, which are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act … the former case, any change in the incorporated statute by way of amendment or repeal has no effect on the incorporation statute. In other words, … of the respondents in appeal No. 273 of 2006 that Regulations are part and parcel of the … to say a few words of my own with regard to the impact of the fourth proviso to Section 14 and effect of Sections 61, 62 and the relevant provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short Act … also not given any over-riding effect to the Rules and Regulations framed under the Act of 2003

Biman Bangladesh Airlines Vs. Anup Mittal and Another

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

All India Digital Cable Federation vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of ...

Court : Kerala

Price (MRP) of television channels charged from the customer by way of Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection (Second Amendment) Regulation, 2006. The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘TDSAT’), on 27.02.2007, in the … Services Interconnection (Addressable Systems) Regulation 2017; (2) Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Standards of Quality of Services and Consumer Protection (Addressable Systems) Regulations 2017; and (3) Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2017. [hereinafter … association, were heard exercising the powers conferred under Rule 152 of the Rules of the High Court of Kerala, 1971, and perused the pleadings and … 193/2023 : 25 :contended that TRAI is a statutory body established under Section 3 of the Act, 1997, which was promulgated to establish TRAI, to … TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 193 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S:1

National Insurance Company Limited Vs. M/S. Mrh Associates and Another

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Af ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

serious, the farmers in the zone allocated to the proposed unit suffer for no fault of their own. Consumer interests too would be adversely affected. In order to safeguard the interests of farmers, industry and consumers, it … an explanation for cancelling and derecognizing the IEM of respondent No.7. The second respondent ought to have re-recognized the IEM filed by respondent No.7 and … Section 3 of Essential Commodities Act, 1965, and by virtue of an amendment dated 10-11-2006 inserted Clause 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D, and 6E in the … part of Article 21 of the Constitution, stands violated. It is the primary duty of the State to protect and improve the environment under Article 48A and 51A(g) of the Constitution. 19. Respondent No.13/ the Panchayath Development … Raj (Gram Panchayaths Control Over Erection of Buildings) Rules, 1994 is the requirement of law. The show … completely de-licensed the sugar industry with effect from 14-9-1998 wherein the concept of filing of IEM with

Wyeth Vs. Levine

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Congress’ purposes is to the contrary. Building on its 1906 Act, Congress enacted the FDCA to bolster consumer protection against harmful products. See Kordel v. United States , 335 U. S. 345 , 349 (1948); United States … for her nausea. Because the combination did not provide relief, she returned later that day and received a second injection of both drugs. This time, the physician assistant administered the drugs by the IV-push method, and Phenergan … by Congress but on the preamble to a 2006 FDA regulation declaring that state-law failure-to-warn claims threaten … prove harm to keep a drug out of the market, but the amendments required the manufacturer to demonstrate that its drug was “safe for use … a third supplemental application in 1981 in response to a new FDA rule governing drug labels. Over the next 17 years, Wyeth and the FDA … requirements, including subpart B of part 201 and sections 314.70 and 601.12 of title 21, Code of … in relation to the drug’s therapeutic benefits. App. 14-15. Wyeth filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing

Set Discovery P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2, 2(1), 8(1), 8(4), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 12(4), 13, 14, 28, 29, 34, 35, 36 and 37; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 7B(I); Telecom Regulatory Appellate Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 14; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 5(1); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; CTN Act; CTN Rules; Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulations, 2004 - Regulations 3.2, 4, 4.1 and 4.2; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 19(1); Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Service) Interconnection (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2006; Telecom Regulatory Authority of I

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi159; 151(2008)DLT531; 2008(104)DRJ590

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; 68 of 1986(C) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in Sub-section (I) … 9 to 12 of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Service) Interconnection (Third Amendment) Regulation, 2006 (10 of 2006) dated 4.9.2006 (No. 6-4/2006-B&CS;) as amended by … fine which may extend to one lakh rupees and in case of second or subsequent offence with fine which may extend to two lakh rupees … the meetings of the Authority under Sub-section (4) of Section 8;c. [Clause(c) omitted by Act 2 of 2000, Section 14 (w.r.e.f. 24-1-2000)]d. matters in respect of which register is to be maintained by the authority under Sub-clause (vii) … any offence punishable under this Act or the rules or regulations made thereunder, save on a complaint

Star India P. Ltd. Vs. the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : ConstitutionMedia and communication

Acts : Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2, 2(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 14, 28, 35 and 37; Companies Act, 1956; Citizenship Act; Sea Customs Act - Sections 52A; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 3(1AA); Telecom Regulatory Appellate Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000; Broadcasting Act; Cinematograph Act; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 - Sections 22; Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994 - Rules 4A(4), 9, 10 and 72; Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Second) Tariff (Fourth Amendment) Order, 2006; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 31(1), 141, 142, 161, 226 and 301 to 307; Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services)

Reported in : 146(2008)DLT455

and Cable) Services (Third) (CAS Area) Tariff Order 2006 and further that the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) (Second Amendment) Regulation, 2006 dated 24.8.2006 be struck down being vocative of Articles 14, 19, 301 to 307 of the … (3) of Section 11. By means of this very amendment the TDSAT had also been established which by Section 14 has the power to adjudicate any disputes between a licensor and a licensee between two or more service … customers. The effort was to devise a method of protecting and promoting consumer interests by ensuring fair competition within service providers. The TRAI Act came … of which the petitioner is a shareholder. A shareholder is entitled to protection of Article 19. That individual right is not lost by reason of … powers of pre-censorship under the Cinematograph Act and Rules. The only limitation on the said right is,