Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: consumer protection amendment act 2002 section 8 · Page 1 of about 844 results (0.048 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 05 2005

Smt. Sunita Devi and ors. Vs. Abdhesh Kumar Sinha Alias Kamleshwari Pd ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-05-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 151 - Order 8, Rule 1, 9 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13; Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act - Sections 15

the aforesaid case of Dr. J. J. Merchant ( : [2002]SUPP1SCR469 (supra) was considering the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act (68 of 1986) and had only made a passing reference to the provisions of Order VIII Rule … the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 1999 (Act 46 of 1999) and the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 2002 (Act 22 of 2002) the provision of Rule 1 of Order VIII in the Code of 1908 was … Jhar HCR 568 Para 7) are as follows :'4. In my view. Section 16(1) of the (Bihar) Amendment Act 2002 clearly provided that except in … the parties. The petitioners are defendants 1st set in Title Suit No. 87 of 2004, which was filed by plaintiffs-opposite party Nos. 1 and 2

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2005

Mahendra Ram Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-17-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 5, Rule 1 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 15L, 27 and 30L

Merchant v. Shrinath Chowdhary reported in : [2002]SUPP1SCR469 , which was only with regard to the provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and in which only a passing reference to the provision of Order VIII Rule 1 of … the aforesaid matter, the plaintiff again filed a petition under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code for amendment of the plaint, whereupon the defendant-petitioner was directed to file his reply. In the meantime, the plaintiff opposite … provision of the Amending Acts of 1999 and 2002 specifically provided under Section 32(L) and Section 15(L) respectively that only when a written statement is … plaintiff opposite party has contended that as per the provision of Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code, the Court had no jurisdiction to accept

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2003

Shailaja A. Sawant (Dr.) Vs. Sayajirao Ganpatrao Patil

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Order 8, Rules 1, 9 and 10

Reported in : 2004(5)BomCR548; 2004(2)MhLj419

service of the writ of summons as prescribed by Order 8, Rule 1. The Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 will be hereinafter referred to as the 'recent Amendment' while Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999 will … that the three Hon'ble Judges of the Supreme Court have considered the provisions of Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and while doing so their Lordships have held that for having speedy trial, the legislative mandate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 29 2012

Aquadev India Ltd. Vs. State Bank of Hyderabad and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Feb-29-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2005

Smt. Rani Kusum Vs. Smt. Kanchan Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rules 1 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(2)

Reported in : AIR2005SC3304; 2005(4)AWC3861G(SC); 2005(3)BLJR2132; 2005(4)CTC809; [2005(4)JCR118(SC)]; JT2005(7)SC409; 2006(I)OLR(SC)8; (2005)141PLR627; RLW2005(4)SC2244; (2005)6SCC705;

without any order as to costs. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 8 Rule 1 - Written statement - Effect of Amendment Act, 2002 - … the respondent to file reply beyond total period of 45 days in view of Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. It was held that the intention to provide time frame to file reply is really made … of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short 'CPC') as amended by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 (in short the 'Amendment Act').3. Factual position is almost undisputed and, therefore, need not be elaborated. Respondent was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2005

Masroor Ali Vs. Court of Incharge, District Judge/Addl. Dist. Judge an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13 and 87(1); Representation of the People Act, 1951; Representation of the People Rules; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rules 1, 5, 6A, 9, 10 and 12 - Order 9, Rule 7 - Order 13, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 225

Reported in : AIR2005All334; 2006(1)AWC893

Topline Shoes Ltd. v. Corporation Bank, : [2002]3SCR1167 , pari materia provision contained in Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 came up for the consideration of the Court. The provision requires the opposite party to a … enforcement. The text of the provision in the present form has been introduced by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 (22 of 2002) with effect from 1-7-2002. The purpose of such like amendments is stated in the Statement … of the CPC is not called for.(ii) On the language of Section 87(1) of the Act, it is clear that the applicability of the procedure

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2005

Kailash Vs. Nanhku and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-06-2005

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 79, 80, 81, 82, 86, 86(6), 86(7), 87, 87(1), 90(3), 117, 169, ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4(1), 129 - Order1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rules 1, 9 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Evidence Act, 1872; Constitution of India - Article 225; Court Rules - Rules 5 and 12; Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 - Sections 384; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR2005SC2441; 2005(3)ALD102(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)689; 2005(1)ARC861; 2005(2)AWC1490(SC); 2005(2)BLJR1422; 2005(3)BomCR906; 2005(3)CTC355; JT2005(4)SC204; 2005(2)KLT623(SC); (2005) 4 SCC 480

in Topline Shoes Ltd. v. Corporation Bank : [2002]3SCR1167, pari materia provision contained in Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 came up for the consideration of the Court. The provision requires the opposite party to a … enforcement. The text of the provision in the present form has been introduced by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 (22 of 2002) with effect from 1.7.2002. The purpose of such like amendments is stated in the Statement … was declared elected. Respondent No. 1 filed an election petition under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter 'the Act', for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2007

V. Anil Kumar Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by Its Chief Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-2007

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9 to 27A, 27(1), 27(2), 27(3) and 30A; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 9 to 21, 32 and 32(1); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(2); Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 - Regulation 24

Reported in : AIR2008Mad56; (2007)6MLJ1777

contention of the petitioner that though Section 27(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as inserted by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002, with effect from 15.03.2003, conferred upon the District Forums, the State Commissions and the National Commission, the powers … Sub-section (1) of these sections, to establish a Magistrate Court, in the first instance. Paragraph Nos. 7 and 8 of the said judgment read as follows:7. A perusal of the aforesaid Section clearly indicates that the power

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2016

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2016

Subject : MRTP

Manager Telecom v. M. Krishnan and Anr.: JT (2009) 11 SC 690 and Chairman, Thiruvalluvar Transport Corporation v. Consumer Protection Council : (1995) 2 SCC 479 in support of his contention that the Patents Act was a specific … to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under: … such combinations to be void. 117. Section 7 of the Competition Act provides for establishment of CCI and Section 8 provides for its composition. Section 16 of the Competition Act provides for appointment of Director General for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2009

Shanthiniketan Housing Foundation (A) Registered Partnership Firm) Rep ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-19-2009

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 25, 27, 27A, 27(1), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 37(1), 40 and 40(1); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(1) and 21; Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4, 6, 173, 200(1), 200(2), 207, 227, 238 to 240, 242, 248, 251 to 258, 260, 262, 262(2), 263, 264, 265, 289, 325, 360 and 494; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1892 - Sections 349 and 562; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1872 - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2589; 2009(6)KarLJ205

while taking note of the aforesaid amendment, observed as under:4. It is to be noted that by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 (62 of 2002), as contained in Section 23 of the Amending Act, the proviso which was struck down … aforesaid judgment, the Supreme Court in the case of Omprakash Shivprakash v. K.I. Kuriakose and Ors. : (1999) 8 SCC 633 held as under:When does the trial' begin as for an offence under the Act? The word

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial