Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: consumer protection amendment act 2002 section 6 · Page 1 of about 909 results (0.050 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 19 2009

Shanthiniketan Housing Foundation (A) Registered Partnership Firm) Rep ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-19-2009

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 25, 27, 27A, 27(1), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 37(1), 40 and 40(1); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(1) and 21; Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4, 6, 173, 200(1), 200(2), 207, 227, 238 to 240, 242, 248, 251 to 258, 260, 262, 262(2), 263, 264, 265, 289, 325, 360 and 494; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1892 - Sections 349 and 562; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1872 - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2589; 2009(6)KarLJ205

while taking note of the aforesaid amendment, observed as under:4. It is to be noted that by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 (62 of 2002), as contained in Section 23 of the Amending Act, the proviso which was struck down … (2). Therefore, it is necessary to find out the meaning and the purpose of introducing this non-obstante clause.23. Section 6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, for short hereinafter referred to as 'the code' defines Classes of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2016

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2016

Subject : MRTP

Manager Telecom v. M. Krishnan and Anr.: JT (2009) 11 SC 690 and Chairman, Thiruvalluvar Transport Corporation v. Consumer Protection Council : (1995) 2 SCC 479 in support of his contention that the Patents Act was a specific … to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under: … from abusing its dominant position. Section 5 of the Competition Act outlines the scope of a 'combination' and Section 6 of the Competition Act prohibits any person or enterprise from entering into a combination, which causes or is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2005

Arati Das Vs. State and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-19-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9, 10, 10(1), 10(1A), 10(2), 24B, 24B(1) and 24B(2); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002; Orissa General Clauses Act - Sections 17; Orissa Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Rules 3, 3(5), 3(6), 6 and 6(7)

Reported in : AIR2006Ori13; 100(2005)CLT169

:Provided also that a person appointed as the President or as a member, before the commencement of the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002, shall continue to hold such office as President or member, as the case may be, till the completion … Consumer Welfare DepartmentNo. 25097, Dt. 14.9.2000 - CW - 46/2000NotificationIn accordance with the provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the State Govt. do hereby appoint the following persons as President/Member … made through the petitioner as Agent. From the report, vide, letter No. 677, dated 3.6.02 of the President, District Forum, Balasore, it was found that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 17 2005

Mahendra Ram Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-17-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 5, Rule 1 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 15L, 27 and 30L

Merchant v. Shrinath Chowdhary reported in : [2002]SUPP1SCR469 , which was only with regard to the provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and in which only a passing reference to the provision of Order VIII Rule 1 of … the aforesaid matter, the plaintiff again filed a petition under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code for amendment of the plaint, whereupon the defendant-petitioner was directed to file his reply. In the meantime, the plaintiff opposite … provision of the Amending Acts of 1999 and 2002 specifically provided under Section 32(L) and Section 15(L) respectively that only when a written statement is … S.N. Hussain, J.1. I. A. No. 6308 of 2004 has been filed for condoning the delay in filing of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2007

V. Anil Kumar Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by Its Chief Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-2007

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9 to 27A, 27(1), 27(2), 27(3) and 30A; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 9 to 21, 32 and 32(1); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(2); Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 - Regulation 24

Reported in : AIR2008Mad56; (2007)6MLJ1777

contention of the petitioner that though Section 27(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as inserted by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002, with effect from 15.03.2003, conferred upon the District Forums, the State Commissions and the National Commission, the powers … aforesaid decision.14. Coming to the relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, it is seen that Section 6 of the Code provides for the establishment of four classes of criminal Courts in every State (apart from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2009

N. Kannadasan Vs. Ajoy Khose and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2009

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumers Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 6, 6(7), 7, 9, 16, 16(1), 16(1A), 17 and 20(1); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 37; High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954; Government of India Act, 1915; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 220; Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956; Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; Executive Act; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4 and 4(1); City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 15; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956; Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960 - Regulation 25; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 50, 124, 164, 164(4), 191(1), 216 to 224A, 233 and 368; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : JT2009(7)SC601; 2009(8)SCALE351; (2009)7SCC104

Justice of the High Court in considering the same person for appointment to any judicial office under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or any other similar offices in other Tribunals & Commissions ?ii) Since an independent and fair … have to go back to the Bar. The learned Judge furthermore noticed the enactment of the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, in terms whereof existing Article 224 was substituted by a new Article and the existing Article 224 … of appointment of a judicial member of CAT. It is for this precise reason that Sub-section (7) to Section 6 of the Act requires that the appointment of a member of CAT cannot be made 'except after consultation … judicial independence in a case involving the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.93. Qualification to hold the post was found to be necessary also in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2004

D.C.M. Financial Services Ltd. Co. Vs. M.P. Dhingra

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Mar-20-2004

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2010

St. Mary’s Oil Mills Vs. Shree JaIn Roadways

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Nov-30-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2005

Masroor Ali Vs. Court of Incharge, District Judge/Addl. Dist. Judge an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13 and 87(1); Representation of the People Act, 1951; Representation of the People Rules; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rules 1, 5, 6A, 9, 10 and 12 - Order 9, Rule 7 - Order 13, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 225

Reported in : AIR2005All334; 2006(1)AWC893

Topline Shoes Ltd. v. Corporation Bank, : [2002]3SCR1167 , pari materia provision contained in Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 came up for the consideration of the Court. The provision requires the opposite party to a … enforcement. The text of the provision in the present form has been introduced by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 (22 of 2002) with effect from 1-7-2002. The purpose of such like amendments is stated in the Statement … a counter-claim which in the light of Rule 9 read with Rule 6A would be a counter-claim against the claim of the plaintiff preferred in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2005

Kailash Vs. Nanhku and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-06-2005

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 79, 80, 81, 82, 86, 86(6), 86(7), 87, 87(1), 90(3), 117, 169, ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4(1), 129 - Order1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rules 1, 9 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Evidence Act, 1872; Constitution of India - Article 225; Court Rules - Rules 5 and 12; Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 - Sections 384; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR2005SC2441; 2005(3)ALD102(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)689; 2005(1)ARC861; 2005(2)AWC1490(SC); 2005(2)BLJR1422; 2005(3)BomCR906; 2005(3)CTC355; JT2005(4)SC204; 2005(2)KLT623(SC); (2005) 4 SCC 480

in Topline Shoes Ltd. v. Corporation Bank : [2002]3SCR1167, pari materia provision contained in Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 came up for the consideration of the Court. The provision requires the opposite party to a … enforcement. The text of the provision in the present form has been introduced by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 (22 of 2002) with effect from 1.7.2002. The purpose of such like amendments is stated in the Statement … copy of the election petition, requiring his appearance before the Court on 6.4.2004. On the appointed day, the appellant appeared through his counsel and sought

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial