Advanced Search Results

Faqir Chand Gulati Vs. Uppal Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 14; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD102(SC); 2008BusLR712(SC); III(2008)CPJ48(SC); 2008(4)CTC170; JT2008(7)SC552; (2008)6MLJ721(SC); 2008(II)OLR(SC)446; 2008(9)SCALE768; (2008)10SCC345; 2008[12]S.T; 2008AIRSCW5216; 2008(4)CivilLJ60; 2008(5)LH(SC)3748.

words 'the provision of' are substituted by the words 'but not limited to, the provision of' by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 (62 of 2002) with effect from 15.3.2003]Contentions:10. The appellant contends that though the agreement is captioned as 'collaboration … and enables persons having grievances regarding goods supplied or services provided, to file complaints before such redressal agencies. Section 14 enumerates the reliefs that can be granted by a redressal agency to the complainant if he satisfies the

Arati Das Vs. State and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Service

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9, 10, 10(1), 10(1A), 10(2), 24B, 24B(1) and 24B(2); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002; Orissa General Clauses Act - Sections 17; Orissa Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Rules 3, 3(5), 3(6), 6 and 6(7)

Reported in : AIR2006Ori13; 100(2005)CLT169

:Provided also that a person appointed as the President or as a member, before the commencement of the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002, shall continue to hold such office as President or member, as the case may be, till the completion … Consumer Welfare DepartmentNo. 25097, Dt. 14.9.2000 - CW - 46/2000NotificationIn accordance with the provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the State Govt. do hereby appoint the following persons as President/Member

Shanthiniketan Housing Foundation (A) Registered Partnership Firm) Rep ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 25, 27, 27A, 27(1), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 37(1), 40 and 40(1); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(1) and 21; Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4, 6, 173, 200(1), 200(2), 207, 227, 238 to 240, 242, 248, 251 to 258, 260, 262, 262(2), 263, 264, 265, 289, 325, 360 and 494; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1892 - Sections 349 and 562; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1872 - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2589; 2009(6)KarLJ205

while taking note of the aforesaid amendment, observed as under:4. It is to be noted that by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 (62 of 2002), as contained in Section 23 of the Amending Act, the proviso which was struck down … before a judge who has jurisdiction over it, according to the laws of the land' (Wharton's Law Lexicon, 14th edn., p. 1011). The words 'tried' and trial' appear to have no fixed or universal meaning. No doubt,

Aquadev India Ltd. Vs. State Bank of Hyderabad and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Colgate-palmolive (India) Limited Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCivil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1987; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 36A, 36(1) and 55; Lanham Act; Federal Trade Commission Act - Sections 5(1), 12, 15 and 15(1); Broadcasting Act, 1981; Cable Broadcasting Act, 1984; European Communities Act; Young Persons (Harmful Publications) Act, 1956; Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use)Act, 1950; Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986; Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994; Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Prize Competition Act, 1955; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978; Cigarettes and other Tobacco Product

Reported in : (2008)7MLJ1119; 2009(40)PTC653(Mad)

Amendment Act 62 of 2002 with effect from 15-3-2003, enables the Consumer Forum to pass interim orders. Similarly, Section 14 (1) (hc) inserted under the very same Amendment Act 62 of 2002, has enlarged the scope of a … companies from indulging in false publicity campaign (except to a limited extent under the MRTP Act and the Consumer Protection Act). We only have judge-made laws developing in the recent past. But the decisions of various Courts which … 292(2)(b) of Indian Penal Code declaring advertisements relating to obscene material as punishable(ii)Section 292-A(e), I.P.C., (inserted by Tamilnadu Amendment Act 25 of 1960 in its application to the State) making it a punishable offence to release advertisements containing … trade practice.55. However, The MRTP Act, 1969 is sought to be repealed by Section 66 of The Competition Act, 2002 ( Section 66 does not appear to have been notified so far). But fortunately, the power to enquire

Shrikant G. Mantri Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

make the said Act more effective by removing various lacunae, the legislature amended the said Act by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2002 Amendment Act”). One of the objects for bringing out the 2002 Amendment … in Consumer Complaint No.55 of 2006, thereby holding that the appellant­complainant was not a consumer as envisaged under Section 2(1)(d) of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 2 “the said Act”). As such, by … unable to regularise the overdraft account, the erstwhile Bank, vide letter dated 14th September, 2001, called upon the appellant­complainant to pay a sum of Rs.600.61

Vincent Anty Vs. M/S. M.B. Kirloskar Oil Engine Limited, Through: Mana ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

St. Mary’s Oil Mills Vs. Shree JaIn Roadways

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Vandana Global Limited Vs. M/S. Jaypee Engg. and Hydraulics Equipment ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

K. Kanakachandran Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 16(1) and 16(3); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002; Kerala Consumer Protection Rules, 2005 - Rules 16 and 17; Representation of People Act; Representation of People Rules - Rule 119

Reported in : AIR2007Ker155

of the petitioner. The learned Counsel brought to my notice the statement of objects and reasons of the Amendment Act, 2002, introduced to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act. The learned Counsel submitted that having regard to the … ORDERK. Balakrishnan Nair, J.1. The point that arises for decision in this case is concerning the interpretation of Section 16(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The brief facts leading to the case are the following:2. The … Singh v. S. Karnail Singh : [1957]1SCR208 the expression 'not later than 14 days' as used in Rule 119 under Representation of the People Act