Advanced Search Results

Shrikant G. Mantri Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

make the said Act more effective by removing various lacunae, the legislature amended the said Act by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2002 Amendment Act”). One of the objects for bringing out the 2002 Amendment … be set up at the district, State and Central levels. It will be apposite to refer to the preamble of the said Act, which reads thus: “An Act to provide for better protection of the interests of … 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Manager Telecom v. M. Krishnan and Anr.: JT (2009) 11 SC 690 and Chairman, Thiruvalluvar Transport Corporation v. Consumer Protection Council : (1995) 2 SCC 479 in support of his contention that the Patents Act was a specific … three sets of substantial amendments by three Acts: The Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999 (17 of 1999); The Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (38 of 2002); and The Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (15 of 2005). These sets of amendments - apart … Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 and the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009. 114. The Preamble of the Competition Act reads as under:- "An Act to provide, keeping … Vibhu Bakhru, J. 1. These petitions have been filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ), a company

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

same interest become involved and what is more would be bound by the decision. Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act which also captures and embodies the principle of Order 1 Rule 8 ensures the protection of class … of India. They call in 2 question Sections 3, 4 and 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the impugned amendments’, for short). Section 3 of the impugned amendment, amends Section … which is challenged. She drew our attention to Section 2(u) and 20 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. She would submit but for Section 32A, the properties 5 (2019) 11 SCC6336 (2019) 4 SCC1726 which are … introduced sub-Section 3A in Section 25A. It reads as follows: “[…].2. The Preamble to the Code lays down the objects of the Code to include

Life Insurance Agents Co-Operative Society Ltd. No.R. 1021, vs Nelson ...

Court : Kerala

the petitioners, since it is a Co-operativeSociety and thus it is taken out of the purview of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and therefore, complaints filed by the 1 st and 2nd respondents were not maintainable and accordingly, … Consumer Protection Act was enacted on 24.12.1986. On a reading of the preamble of the Act, it is evident that the said Act is enacted … Calcutta High Court was called upon to decide the impact of Section 84 of Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002. Since the said Act contained a provision for arbitration, it was held that the provisions of the Consumer … the President of India. However, pertinently, the provisions under Section 69 underwent amendment by the State Legislative Assembly and was given effect from 2-1-2003 and

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mohanlal Aggarwal

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Indian Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999; Health Insurance Act, 1994 - Sections 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 3, 9, 9(1), 10A, 14(2), 18(1), 19, 24(1), 24A, 26 and 39(2); Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999 - Sections 14, 14(2), 18(1), 26 and 32; Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 114A(2); General Insurance Business (Nationalization) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 18(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36(1), 80D, 119 and 192; Contract Act - Sections 37; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 38, 39, 47 and 226; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rule 8C; Insurance Rules, 1939 - Rule 11

Reported in : 2004ACJ1657

Chandmull Jain (supra) was applicable.6. In Special Civil Application NO. 9425 of 2002, which was filed by the Consumer Education and Research society and two insured persons for a direction on the respondent No.1 (New India Assurance … in India was removed. By Section 10A inserted in the Act of 1972, by General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Amendment Act, 2002, all the shares in the capital of these Government Insurance Companies that vested in the GIC before the … under the cover-notes enclosed with the letters. It was stipulated that the protection note cannot under any circumstances be applicable for a longer period than … held that : 'It would thus be well settled law that the Preamble Chapter of Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles accord right to livelihood as

Cellular Operators Association of India and Ors. Vs. Telecom Regulator ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (C) the dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in … notwithstanding anything contained in the terms and conditions of the licence granted before the commencement of the TRAI Amendment Act, 2000.58. The same kind of language is contained in Section 402(d) of the Companies Act, 1956, which reads … have also argued, based on Section 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 27(d) of the Competition Act, 2002, that no power is given by the TRAI Act for interference with licence conditions, which amount to a … caused to the consumers. It was further argued, based on the amended Preamble to the TRAI Act, that the Impugned Regulation only protects the interest … referred to as the “Impugned Regulation”), notified on 16.10.2015, (to take effect from 1.1.2016), by the Telecom

State of Gujarat Vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionEnvironment

Acts : Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 2 and 4; ;Bombay Animal Preservation Act, 1954 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(1A) and 5(2); ;Bombay Animal Preservation Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3) and 6; ;Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Extension and Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 4; ;Saurashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1956; Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1979; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to 19(6), 25, 25(1), 31C, 37, 39, 47, 48, 48A, 51A, 141 and 145(3); Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Ordinance, 1993; Bihar Preservation and Improvement of Animals Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955; ;Central Provinces and Berar Animal Preservation Act, 1949; Madhya Pradesh Krish

Reported in : AIR2006SC212; (2006)1GLR294; [2006(2)JCR272(SC)]; JT2005(12)SC580; RLW2006(1)SC705; 2005(8)SCALE661; (2005)8SCC534; 2006(1)LC240(SC)

R.C. Lahoti, C.J. 1. Section 2 of the Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1994 (Gujarat Act No. 4 of 1994) which introduced certain amendments in Section 5 of the Bombay Animal … opportunities. Another reason for lack of food and nutrient intake through cereal consumption is attributable to changes in consumer tastes and preferences towards superior food items as the incomes of the household increases. Empirical evidence tends to … has great importance. It has, therefore, become necessary to emphasise preservation and protection of agricultural animals like bulls and bullocks. With the growing adoption of … they become 'less useful'. (Report of the National Commission on Cattle, July 2002, Volume I, p. 279.)47. The Report of the National Commission on Cattle … State Government may appoint in this behalf.'3. The Preamble to the Act stated - 'WHEREAS it is

C. Venkatachalam Vs. Ajitkumar C. Shah and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 32, 33; Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Sections 29, 31, 32 - Rule 2(b); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 302, 303, 304; Merchandise Marks Act, 1887; Immigration and Asylum Act - Section 84; Constitution of India - Article 19

remedy under the ordinary law for various reasons has become illusory. 38. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was amended in the years 1991, 1993 and in 2002 to make it more effective and purposeful. 39. To effectuate … prompt remedy. 37. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is dedicated, as its preamble shows, to provide for effective protection of the rights of the consumers. … petitions were allowed by the Division Bench. The High Court held that the Consumer Fora constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 have “trappings of a civil court” but “are not civil courts within the meaning of the … 1. These appeals emanate from the judgment dated 4.9.2002 delivered by the Division

Hemant Sharma and ors Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); Competition Act, 2002 - Section 19(1)(b); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 19(1)(c), 19(1)(g); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946; Central, State or Provincial Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154(3), 156(3); Competition Commission Act, 2002

developing sports in India, and the role played by the association in protection and promotion of players interest and welfare.4. Ms. Palli, learned counsel for … the Statement of Objects and Reasons, and the preamble of the Competition Act, that the said Act … 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks the issuance … practices having adverse effect on competition, to promote and sustain competition in markets, to protect the interests of consumers and to ensure freedom of trade carried out by other participants and markets in India. She also refers … that I shall abide by the rules and regulations and the latest amendments and decisions of the State/District Chess Association/Federation as the case may be … and conduct of respondent No.2 may, therefore, call for examination by the Competition Commission constituted under the Competition Act, 2002.14. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in State of West

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property

have been made in the form of legislations such as US Federal Trademark Dilution Act, 1995 and Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 1999, to protect famous marks from getting diluted.46. Interestingly, the cases which appeared in the early stages … pleadings, the plaintiff, of their own accord, came up with an application in A.No.6379 of 2009, seeking an amendment of the plaint and the original applications. The scope of the amendment sought for, was (i) to insert … ECJ held, with reference to Article 14 and recital 42 in the preamble to Directive 2000/31 that the exemption from liability would cover only cases … hence would become a restrictive trade practice, disallowed by the Competition Act, 2002.29. From the rival contentions briefly presented above, it is seen that fortunately, … The plaintiff has several matrimonial web portals including 15 regional portals, catering to the needs of millions