Advanced Search Results

Radhelal Gupta Vs. State Bar Council of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 5, 8 and 8A; Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 74 and 85

Reported in : AIR2002MP98; 2002(2)MPHT10

gets extended. At this juncture I may proceed to give example by referring to the provision of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 16 of the Act deals with composition of the State Commission. It provides each Commission shall constitute that … under :--(a) Section 8 of the Act stipulates term of office of members of State Bar Council and Section 8A of the Act deals with constitution of Special Committee in the absence of election and, therefore, no member

State of U.P. and Ors Vs. All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Ass.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(C) No.164 OF2002JUDGMENT Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J1The deficiency of infrastructure in the adjudicatory fora constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has led to several directions of this Court in the course of the proceedings in this case. On … of sub-section (2) and sub-section (4) of section 7, clause (b) of sub-section (2) and sub-section (4) of Section 8A, clause (b) of sub-section (1) and sub-section(3) of section 10, clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 13,

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Mahesh Chandra Arya

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Escotel Mobile Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Telecom Authority of India Ordinance, 1997 - Sections 14(2)

Reported in : 1997(43)DRJ582

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission established under Section 9 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (c) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in Sub-section (1) of … said to affect not only Haryana Circle but Punjab Circle as well two applications under Order 1 Rule 8A read with Section 151, Cpc, were moved by two licencees in Punjab Circle, namely, M/s. J.T. Mobile Ltd.

Accountant General, M.P. Vs. S.K.Dubey and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9(1), 30(2), 16(2), 31; First Schedule of the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 - Articles 112(3)(d)(iii), 217(1), 221 and 224A; Madhya Pradesh Consumer Protection Rules, 1987; Constitution Of India - Article 136; Madras Race Club (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1986

Disputes Redressal Commission, Madhya Pradesh (for short, 'State Commission') established under clause (b) of Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ( for short, '1986 Act'). The respondent assumed office on September 21, 1998 and continued to hold that … sub-section (2) and sub-section (4) of section 7, clause (b) of sub-section (2) and sub- section (4) of section 8A, clause (b) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (3) of section 10, clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section

N.Premkumar Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

relevant statutory provisions that govern the process of appointment to the post of President of the DCDRF. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986:2. Definitions:- (1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (a) ........................... (b) ........................... (c) ........................... (d) ........................... … of sub-section (2) and sub-section (4) of Section 7, clause (b) of sub-section (2) and sub-section (4) of Section 8A, clause (b) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (3) of Section 10, clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section

Urban Improvement Trust Bikaner Vs. Gordhan Dass(d) Through Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was argued by the Counsel for the Trust that even if it was an illegal encroachment, jurisdiction under Consumer Protection Act,1986 could not be invoked. Rejecting the arguments of the Counsel for the Trust, the Supreme Court made … suits, applications and appeals which could be maintained under the Act. Entry 8A provides that a suit for injunction could be filed before the Court … name of the plaintiff was not entered rather it continued to reflect previous Khatedar’s name. Moreover, notice under Section 52(2) of the 1959 Act was issued to the recorded Khatedars, award was passed in the year 1985

M/S Siddhi Construction Co Through Its Proprietor Pradeep Dalichand Sh ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

The Chief Manager, M/S Icici Bank Ltd., Home Loan Wings Vs. Vikram Kot ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Paramjit Kumar and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh